This is an archive of past discussions about User:Oiyarbepsy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
Template:2015 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pppery (talk) 11:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
User talk:Oiyarbepsy/topic/20160825
Hello, I saw you edited this article, and I'm looking around for anyone who knows about Nepal. Recently there was a move war where someone was moving Nepalis to Nepali Bhasi. I just moved it back, per WP:RMTR, but now I'm wondering what would be a normal arrangement of articles in this space. There is a page at Nepali (disambiguation) that has no entry for Nepalis. Would you have any interest in looking into this, and perhaps fixing it? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 21:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
User talk:Oiyarbepsy/topic/20160921
Following up from the consensus reached here, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in this discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
User talk:Oiyarbepsy/topic/20161006
Hello Oiyarbepsy.
Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.
New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
User talk:Oiyarbepsy/topic/20161119
I am going to decline your request to delete the redirect page Apple blossoms so that Apple Blossom (disambiguation) can be moved there. Your reasoning was "No article specifically discusses apple blossoms". That didn't make sense to me. IMO the DAB page should remain at its current name. It's mostly about things named Apple Blossom, not plural, and with a capital B. Or are you suggesting there SHOULD be an article about apple blossoms? If so, the way to create it is to expand the redirect into an article. If I am misunderstanding your intention here, please explain and I will look at it again. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 03:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Blossoms are produced in spring simultaneously with the budding of the leaves, and are produced on spurs and some long shoots. The 3 to 4 cm (1.2 to 1.6 in) flowers are white with a pink tinge that gradually fades, five petaled, with an inflorescence consisting of a cyme with 4–6 flowers. The central flower of the inflorescence is called the "king bloom"; it opens first, and can develop a larger fruit."
@Wbm1058: Yikes, what a mess! Sorry for doing such a half-baked job of this. Those others didn't show up for me on the search suggestions - one of the disadvantages of having a million similarly-titled redirects. Thanks for deleting all those unnecessary / redundant redirects, that will make the situation much simpler for a searcher. What would you think about deleting Apple blossoms as well? Does it serve any purpose not already served by Apple blossom? If people are offered a simple choice between Apple blossom and Apple Blossom it could make searching easier.
I have changed the target of Apple Blossom to the DAB page. Is the (disambiguation)-named page even necessary? I believe we could move the dab information to plain Apple Blossom and eliminate the middleman; would that be a good idea? Never mind, I see you already did this.
Of course you are right that Apple blossom should be a redirect to Apple. (When I saw that the redirect target did not mention blossoms, I had wondered what was the point of redirecting it there.) Would you suggest making it go to #Botanical information and moving the hatnote there? Or do you prefer a redirect to Apple and leave the hatnote at the top? (Darn Autocorrect, it keeps changing the word hatnote to whatnot! 0;-D)
@Oiyarbepsy: what are your thoughts? --MelanieN (talk) 14:53, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
User talk:Oiyarbepsy/topic/20170619
Thanks for reviewing the new article I wrote, Trump Tower: A Novel ! What do you think of the article? Sagecandor (talk) 02:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
User talk:Oiyarbepsy/topic/20170620
Hey! Just noting that when you moved your RfD nomination of Christ's sakes back a day (not quite sure why you did that, as Twinkle placed it on the correct date in UTC), you didn't change the link on the nomination template (it's fixed now). :) TheDragonFire (talk) 06:02, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
User talk:Oiyarbepsy/topic/20170716
Elena Franklin may be a non-notable actress with very few acting roles to date, but sources point to her being mostly a full time musician now, is that enough to let the article stay on wikipedia? --Wikiman103 (talk) 18:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
User talk:Oiyarbepsy/topic/20170808
Hi, you moved some of the Neelix redirects to the X1 section of the page, were you intending for these ones to be tagged Db-x1? If so I have already done it, but if not i'll remove the tags Emk9 (talk) 00:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)