User talk:Paul sachudhanandam

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paul sachudhanandam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Kindly give me an another chance to serve wikipedia well without any fraudelent activities. Sorry for the mistakes.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 11:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paul sachudhanandam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not continue to cause damage or disruption in Wikipedia. Since i had understood what I have been blocked for. If i get unblocked, I'm grateful to make useful contributions for Wikipedia

Decline reason:

You will need to be much more specific about what you have done wrong, why you won't do it again, and what constructive contributions you want to make exactly, in order to demonstrate your understanding. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paul sachudhanandam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have utilized why I have been blocked in Wikipedia. I was considered as a Sock puppet user by Wikipedia Editors and they have blocked my Ip address too. But what happened is, my fellow workers also interested to dedicate their works in Wikipedia by seeing my contributions, they have just started and blocked. If I get unblocked, I will assure that I won't create any abusive pages in Wikipedia and work for the betterment of this platform

Decline reason:

It's closer than just sharing an IP address. Yamla (talk) 14:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paul sachudhanandam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have said the truth in my previous unblock request. Since it was not considered as a proper one, guide me to get unblocked. I was just started functioning a Wikipedia page last year and get blocked. Do consider!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because of you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲水 15:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paul sachudhanandam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting an appeal because I have utilized what mistake I did in this meantime. I would like to continue the opportunity to contribute for Wikipedia, and have read through WP:COI and WP:sockpuppets

Decline reason:

As has been noted in multiple declined appeals, you aren't clearly stating awareness of what specifically you did wrong, which makes it impossible to determine whether you both know how to avoid similar action and will avoid it. As 331dot has already removed Talk Page access, correctly, you will need to appeal via email at WP:UTRS in the future. Please read the guide to appealing blocks and the UTRS notes carefully before progressing with that route. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As your requests show that you are either unable or unwilling to address the reason for the block, I am removing your ability to edit this page. If your request is declined, you will need to use WP:UTRS to make further appeals. 331dot (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]