User talk:Pgdn963

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:221.148.48.216. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Amos Han Talk 22:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Haemo 23:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, going through your edits, I don't see more than a handful of constructive edits, and some of them (like this) are blatant vandalism. This is your last warning. Make one more unconstructive edit, and this account will be indefinitely blocked. Johnleemk | Talk 07:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Pgdn963 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
221.148.48.216 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism


Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Yamla 17:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]