User talk:Pkbwcgs/Archive/September 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pkbwcgs/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to be unblock because I fully understand that I have kept making bad pages even after many warnings. I also understand that I have been very disruptive on the IRC channel and I promise I won't do this ever again. I am also no longer being disruptive and I have also became an autopatroller on Wikimedia Commons and English Wiktionary. If I am unblocked, I will continue my work in editing the train articles and I won't be rude ever again. I am very sorry for my previous edits. After my 8 month block and reading Wikipedia's policies, I think I have learnt my lesson.

Decline reason:

Three weeks have passed since Admin Vanjagenije offered to put a new unblock request to the Community. This is more than enough time for you to have prepared the necessary text but you have not responded. Consequently, I am closing your appeal. You now know what is required in any future appeal that you may submit. Just Chilling (talk) 00:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:39, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Initially, the text in my unblock request was the text I was prepared to submit as my consensus for the unblock request. However, do not want to make another request. Everything in my unblock request is what I am prepared to submit. I have changed my unblock request so this is the final request I am going to put in.

I would like to be unblocked from Wikipedia because I fully understand that I have continued to make bad pages even though I have constantly been warned not to and I understand that I have been very disruptive and rude on the IRC channel and I promise I won't do this ever again. I am also no longer being disruptive on any other Wikis and I have also became an autopatroller on Wikimedia Commons and English Wiktionary. If I am unblocked, I will continue my work in editing the train articles and I am extremely sorry for my previous edits. I understand that if I break any of Wikipedia's policies, it will lead to a re-block again. After my 8 month block and reading Wikipedia's policies, I think I have learnt my lesson. This is the final request that I would like to submit on WP:ANI and I apologise for reacting later than usual. Thank you -- Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Your ban is result of a community consensus, so new consensus is needed for unblock. You can write a text of an unblock request and I can copy it to WP:ANI (per WP:Offer). Bu sure to fully explain how you understand the reason(s) for block and to write what you plan to edit if unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

I have opened an unblock discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Unblock request for Pkbwcgs. If you have further comments to add or need to respond to something that is said there, you can write it here and someone will copy it over. only (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Please had the fact that I have contributed to adding more definitions than patrolling page in Wiktionary and I have been more specific in my deletion requests than before. Thank you -- Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)