User talk:Shadow187

This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Shadow187 (talk · contribs · block log · arb · SPI) from using it to make disruptive edits, such as abusing the {{unblock}} template.
If you cannot edit this user talk page and you need to make a change or leave a message, you can request an edit, request unprotection, log in, or create an account.

yo, im baaaack!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadow187 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have given the true nature of wikipedia sum thots, an eye think i no tat itz nut fur vandolizoring, its fo reseerchin. so i wood liek a scnd chance fo bein a good fello, and not a vandle. i hop u findz it in ur hart 2 4giv me.

Decline reason:

I'll be honest - I'm not sure if you're spelling phonetically because of lack of education or on purpose, but in either case I do not think there would be a net benefit to Wikipedia if you were unblocked. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 15:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadow187 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, im sorry for the poor spelling, that was my bad! May i ask if you have a heart? because i honestly wish to contribute to wikipedia, and i hope you can find it inside you to give me another chance, i promise you wont be disapointed.

Decline reason:

Best to start a new account; the ugly start on this one will not help your credibility. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadow187 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes i know you have little reason to trust me. but this name has emotional sentimental value so i would very much like a second chance, if i step out of line even a bit you can lock me up forever. please.

Decline reason:

Senitmental attachment to a username is not, has not and shall not ever be a reason to unblock. If it really meant so much to you I doubt you would have used for the purposes you did. This is your last request; page to be protected. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.