Hello,
I am re-visting a posting creation (The Crons Brand) that you had rejected last August with this comment.
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
Yet some of the primary references for footnotes were from the NY Times, Pittsburgh Post Gazette, Wall Street Journal, CNBC and USAToday.
Not sure why these references do not adquately evidence the subject's notability?
Thank you for the clarification and specific suggestion to improve the posting.
ComeReady (talk) 13:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
| This is Snowysusan's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2 |
|
August 19 2012 |
Some helpful Pages:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
- Conflict of interest
- Independent reliable sources
- Referencing for beginners
- Verifiability of source information
- Notability criteria for companies
- Policy regarding self promotional and advertising articles
- What wikipedia is not