 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Spartaz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey sorry I put this comment on the Spartaz/Blah page on accident - I'm about to delete it there: - Regarding your deletion of Mark Prindle's page: It was said in the deletion comments that if sufficient evidence could be shown that Prindle is a notable critic the page would be restored instantly. Is the fact that Pitchfork, in 2003, felt Prindle noteworthy enough to casually cite his opinion on a band in the Pitchfork review evidence? Pitchfork is a respected source for music journalism and even they recognize Prindle as an authority. http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/1270-out-of-reach/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomStockman (talk • contribs) 18:52, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- No, being considered an expert isn't prima facie evidence of notability. You need detailed secondary sources as discussed in the WP:GNG. Spartaz Humbug! 07:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)