I found many of the edits you were making unconstructive. In addition to deleting so many pages and making a mockery of many other, I disagree you were having a balanced view of things. I saw you on multiple times remove and make a mockery of additions done in good faith with lot of supporting sources and hell bent of making a mockery of the article based on your press releases and edits without any neutrality which is want wikipedia claims to stand for. I therefore fear wikipedia is going into hands of editors like yourself who are pushing a certain agenda over truth and are not in any way editing content from a neutral, encyclopedic perspective.
I accept your criticism, as it only further demonstrates my point about how Wikipedia's integrity and ethical standards are being compromised. This behavior reinforces my concerns about the depth of bias and how you’re allowing these standards to erode. It’s unfortunate, as Wikipedia should be a space for balanced information, yet actions like these highlight the troubling direction things are heading. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)