Wikipedia Easy Search

			ARA by JJJ
O	T	F	.js	H	U	E
Overview	Talk	Functions	Script	History	Users	Errors

This page contains a list of errors in the script. Feel free to post comments or errors.

ARA, section, reflist [multiple issues] July 23, 2013

Fixed

Hi JJ. Thank you for ARA, great tool. Forgive me if the following matter has been brought to your attention before, I did a search and could not find it mentioned. When editing this section I noticed that ARA suggested to fix a mising reflist. The article as such has a Reference setion with a reflist. Best, Sam 🎤 08:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]

Hi again JJ. Another little thing that I can't figure out if has been reported previously. I had added a ref to Ferrari F2004 and ARA gave me the "missing Reflist fix" warning. Here it what seems to be the case. Done

Because the appendix looks like this

==See also== {{Commons category}} * [[Ferrari F2002]] * [[Ferrari F2003-GA]] * [[Ferrari F2005]]

Fixing it with ARA results in

==See also== ==References== {{Reflist}} {{Commons category}} * [[Ferrari F2002]] * [[Ferrari F2003-GA]] * [[Ferrari F2005]]

The culprit seems to be {{Commons category}} placed before the See also list. If {{Commons category}} is moved below the list, there is no problem. I have left the Ferrari F2004 article untouched for your testing. If you want to add a ref and remove the unref tag, you can use this source: <ref name="Acerbi2006">{{cite book|author=Leonardo Acerbi|title=Ferrari: A Complete Guide to All Models|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=AcadRoNSWeEC&pg=PA361|accessdate=2 August 2013|year=2006|publisher=MotorBooks International|isbn=978-0-7603-2550-6|pages=361–|quote=The Ferrari F2004 looked like a logical evolution of the previous season's F2003-GA, at least as far as its exterior lines were concerned. But a more careful examination of it confirmed the new car was the result of detailed refinement, partially ...}}</ref> Best, Sam 🎤 15:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]

Similar problem, only now the Reflist gets too far down and (sort of) "violates" WP:ORDER: Try insert this source <ref name="ArmstrongClark2008">{{cite book|author1=Kate Armstrong|author2=Michael Clark|author3=Chris Deliso|title=Greek Islands|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=4PDWSOx4lUwC&pg=PA128|accessdate=2013-08-07|year=2008|publisher=Lonely Planet|isbn=978-1-74104-314-3|pages=128–|quote=At least three ferries daily leave Andros' main port of Gavrio ... GAVRIO. ΓΑΥΡΙΟ. Located on the west coast, Gavrio is the main port of Andros. Apart from the flurry of ferry arrivals it is very low key and a touch drab ...}}</ref> in article Gavrio and then click the "Missing Reflist Fix". Reflist is below the stub template. I hope I don't sound like a stickler when I mention these cases for you. ARA is a real time saver, and I use it daily. Best, Sam 🎤 07:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]

One more in Graphical timeline from Big Bang to Heat Death. The comment outside square brackets in the last See also entry seems to be the challenge here. Useful ref: <ref name="Betts">{{cite book|author=Patrick Betts|title=Astrophysics|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=k8WShzLxoYYC&pg=PA234|accessdate=14 August 2013|publisher=PediaPress|pages=234–|id=GGKEY:PHFJL5YKE00}}</ref> - Best, Sam 🎤 08:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]

Hi again JJ. In article Dato' Keramat LRT station I noticed, that when the section heading for External links is written with cap L, ==External Links==, fixing a missing reflist with ARA will put ==References== below the EL section. Best, Sam 🎤 10:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]

Invalid ref position function error October 4, 2013

On hold until error occurs again

I know the invalid ref position function has a problem of always picking the first instance of <ref> tags when there is a continuing problem of </ref>. instances in the article. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 17:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've only encountered an issue with this function in one article, so I won't address this problem until it happens again. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 14:37, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

v t e Missing ref groups function error October 11, 2013 Fixed
If reference groups such as "nb" are present, the Reflist group isn't added as it's supposed to. Done — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 20:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply] The reference group is added, but I think there is a problem with the unnecessary ref groups function that is displaying an 'undefined' fix link. Done — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 20:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Should add function to modify "unreferenced" and "no footnotes" tags October 23, 2013

Added

If ARA adds a {{reflist}} and a {{no footnotes}} is present alter it to {{more footnotes|date={{subst:CURRENTMONTH}}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}} }}, or if {{unreferenced}} is present alter it to {{refimprove|date={{subst:CURRENTMONTH}}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}}}. -- PBS (talk) 17:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In progress. I'll look into this. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 21:04, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Half done @PBS I added a function to the script to remove the tags if <ref> tags and the {{reflist}} template is present, but it won't add {{refimprove}} because not all articles need more references. That/(those) added citations could have completely verified all statements in the (especially if a small) article. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 23:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

v t e Possible outdated template function error October 24, 2013 Fixed
I encountered an error that deletes the entire article instead of only deleting the template. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 14:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply] Done I had an off-by-one error, trying to access characters beyond the length of the article. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 15:13, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glitch when removing inapplicable tag February 12, 2015

Fixed

Hi JJJ, and thanks for ARA. Have a look at this edit. Best, -- Sam ^Sing! 14:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam Sailor: Hey Sam, sorry I took so long to respond and fix this issue. It appears that the issue was because the inapplicable tag was included in a {{multiple issues}} tag. I believe I have fixed the issue. If you encounter this issue again, please let me know. — TheJJJunk ^{(say hello)} 22:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:TheJJJunk/ARA.js