Target dates: Opened 26 September 2024 • Evidence closes 10 October 2024 • Workshop closes 17 October 2024 • Proposed decision to be posted by 24 October 2024
Scope: What breaches of Wikipedia policies have happened over the past year on the Yasuke article and talk page? See also two additional questions.
Case clerks: SilverLocust (Talk) & HouseBlaster (Talk) Drafting arbitrators: Guerillero (Talk) & Primefac (Talk) & Aoidh (Talk)
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
 |
|
|
| Track related changes |
After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties, and editors at /Workshop, arbitrators may make proposals which are ready for voting. Arbitrators will vote for or against each provision, or they may abstain. Only items which are supported by an absolute majority of the active, non-recused arbitrators will pass into the final decision. Conditional votes and abstentions will be denoted as such by the arbitrator, before or after their time-stamped signature. For example, an arbitrator can state that their support vote for one provision only applies if another provision fails to pass (these are denoted as "first" and "second choice" votes). Only arbitrators and clerks may edit this page, but non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
For this case there are 10 active arbitrators. 6 support or oppose votes are a majority.
| Abstentions | Support votes needed for majority |
|---|---|
| 0 | 6 |
| 1–2 | 5 |
| 3–4 | 4 |
If observing editors notice any discrepancies between the arbitrators' tallies and the final decision or the #Implementation notes, you should post to the clerk talk page. Similarly, arbitrators may request clerk assistance via the same method, or via the clerks' mailing list.
 | Under no circumstances may this page be edited by anyone other than members of the Arbitration Committee or the clerks. Please submit comments on the proposed decision in your own section on the talk page. |