Case clerks: Liz (Talk) & L235 (Talk) Drafting arbitrators: NativeForeigner (Talk) & LFaraone (Talk) & GorillaWarfare (Talk) & Courcelles (Talk)
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
|
Track related changes |
After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties, and editors at /Workshop, arbitrators may make proposals which are ready for voting. Arbitrators will vote for or against each provision, or they may abstain. Only items which are supported by an absolute majority of the active, non-recused arbitrators will pass into the final decision. Conditional votes and abstentions will be denoted as such by the arbitrator, before or after their time-stamped signature. For example, an arbitrator can state that their support vote for one provision only applies if another provision fails to pass (these are denoted as "first" and "second choice" votes). Only arbitrators and clerks may edit this page, but non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
For this case there are 14 active arbitrators, not counting 1 recused. 8 support or oppose votes are a majority.
Abstentions | Support votes needed for majority |
---|---|
0 | 8 |
1–2 | 7 |
3–4 | 6 |
If observing editors notice any discrepancies between the arbitrators' tallies and the final decision or the #Implementation notes, you should post to the clerk talk page. Similarly, arbitrators may request clerk assistance via the same method, or via the clerks' mailing list.
Under no circumstances may this page be edited by anyone other than members of the Arbitration Committee and the clerks. Please submit comments on the proposed decision in your own section on the talk page. |
Given the sensitive nature of this case, the committee has decided to run it in camera. There will be no public evidence submissions or workshop. Editors with direct knowledge of the events or related evidence are requested to email their evidence to arbcom-en-blists.wikimedia.org by 18 May 2015, which is when the evidence phase will end. |