The result was keep. This deletion discussion has seen editors arguing strongly from both sides. Those supporting deletion, or redirecting to the Trials of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito article, which existed for the first 2 days of this AFD, argue that she remains a person known only for one event and that this article is a content fork. This is rebutted by those who support keeping the article, with the strongest arguments being that she is now a very high profile person (thus not the "low-profile individual" that WP:BLP1E describes) due to the large amount of enduring coverage about her. The redirection of the Trials of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito article to Murder of Meredith Kercher during this AFD slightly weakens the arguments of those calling for redirection, as the only article this could now be redirected to would be Murder of Meredith Kercher. As Courcelles said in closing the previous deletion review, is it "proper to redirect a person's name to a crime they were found not guilty of in a court of law. Under BLP principles, it does not sit well in my mind". However even if the Trials article still existed I would still find a consensus here for keeping this article. Even discounting some of the weaker arguments for keeping, there is a strong consensus here that Amanda Knox is a high profile individual, who is no longer someone known for just one event, and that therefore wikipedia should have an article on her. Davewild (talk) 22:04, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]