The result was no consensus. Most of the sources presented by the "keep" !voters are either not significant coverage or not independent of the subject, and there is no evidence that the award he won is particularly notable. However, most of the "delete" arguments are of the form WP:JNN without addressing the validity of sources which do seem OK, like [1]. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)