The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. After filtering out all the off-topic comments it seems fairly clear that consensus favors the view that the sourcing provided does not adequately demonstrate notability for this individual. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]