This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 November 7. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 November 22. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Ignoring the promotional socks, there seems to be consensus that this is barely notable at best. Given the extensive reference bombing, I am applying WP:TNT. No prejudice against recreation if somebody can show notability and create a decent, non-promotional article. Randykitty (talk) 11:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)