The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. I could almost flip a coin on this one. The delete "!voters" and the nom make sound arguments but Metropolitan90's mention of possible non English sources provide just enough reasonable doubt for a no consensus close. If those sources are evaluated and turn out to be sub par then no prejudice against a quick renomination. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:41, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]