This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2024 September 13. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Most of the Keep views relied on the popularity of the organization's data products, which as the others pointed out, does not lend to the notability of the organization itself. Some did a WP:VAGUEWAVE towards GNG, but those who actually reviewed the sources critically found them all to be primary or offering no significant coverage. I also have good reason to believe MichaelDhaenens is Mr. Michaël Dhaenens, the organization's Head of IT, Data & Delivery, tainting his views here with COI. All this leaves us with a rough, P&G-based consensus to delete. Owen× ☎ 16:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)