The result was delete. After giving it an extra 6 hours or so to see if there's any more discussion to be had, it is pretty much as I'd expected. If anything, consensus to delete is even clearer. I'm not opposed to recreation as a redirect, and the suggestion to expand coverage is a nice thought, but of course there needs to be coverage in reliable sources to expand our own coverage, and there's no evidence that there is enough for this article to exist. ansh666 07:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)