The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The issue of lack of sourcing is not very well addressed. There are several assertions that Hagen is an important figure in TeX development, but there is no real evidence that being a contemporary developer, or president of Nederlandstalige TeX Gebruikersgroep (NTG) is an encyclopedic achievement, especially when the person and the group he leads, appear to be fairly low profile in the community at large. Much of the referencing is to webfora or other noticeboards where Hagen is a member, and none of that really contributes to the subject's notability. With the reliable sourcing issue unresolved, I am closing this with a deletion result. Sjakkalle(Check!)14:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]