The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Overall consensus among editors is in favor of keeping the articles. In addition, comments by multiple users are correct in assessing that there is reliable secondary source coverage of these topics. Further, at least one editor is also right in stating that multiple of these sources could be used to improve quality of the listed articles up to at least WP:GA rated quality status. -- Cirt (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]