Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 October 28

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

AfDs for this article:
Leimakids (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The one source cited in the article, Bane's book, only references Nancy Connor's Everything Classical Mythology Book, and looking at (maybe the wrong edition?) of this book, the only mention [1] of "Leimakids" is unsourced. Furthermore, I can't find any mention of "Leimakids" in any modern scholarly source, including pretty exhaustive works such as the DGRBM, Brill's New Pauly, and Pauly-Wissowa. As far as I can tell, there were no such nymphs as the "Leimakids" in Greek mythology; they are probably an invention of some recent source (perhaps Connor). – Michael Aurel (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Michael Aurel (talk) 05:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paganism-related deletion discussions. Michael Aurel (talk) 05:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I am seeing a small number of hits from decent sources on Google Scholar. There's a passing mention to leimoniad nymphs here (I think -- I can't access it). Leimakid nymphs, meanwhile, seem to be mentioned in Silvestre de Balboa's Mirror of patience, so are mentioned in this chapter. Certainly not enough to warrant an article, as far as I can see. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:53, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Checking the Oxford Classical Dictionary, the first source you've linked, the relevant quote is (at least in the edition I'm looking at): other nymphs were named after geographical features, such as the Leimoniads, nymphs of meadows, or the Acheloids, nymphs of the river Acheloiis. So it seems the "Leimoniads" (but not the "Leimakids" from what I can tell) do indeed have some basis in antiquity, as the OCD is a reliable source, though I am a little surprised I couldn't find mention of them in other reference works; the OCD also doesn't make very clear what its source for them is. To add to the obscurity, I've found a copy of Rigoglioso, the source Bane cites for the Leimoniads, and its list of nymphs, in which are mentioned Leimonides (nymphs of flowery meadows), is cited to this page on the quite often unreliable website Theoi.com. – Michael Aurel (talk) 09:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    My German is entirely dependent on Google Translate, and I did not go beyond the lead sentence, which seemed clear enough, but I believe the relevant article in PW is "Leimones". Quickly scanning through the text, I am not seeing any of the other forms mentioned here. But it looks as though we have variant forms of the same name, of which "Leimakids" may be modern(ish). Perhaps this article should be merged with other articles about nymphs, noting the various forms of the name. P Aculeius (talk) 10:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I've added the reference to the nymph article, to which I suggest the current page should be redirected. But I haven't included the name Leimakid; if anyone else thinks there's a good scholarly source for that name, please do add it. (Are they perhaps just different languages' transliterations of the Greek? I've no idea -- I'm no classicist!) Josh Milburn (talk) 15:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict) I think you could be right that this is related, though it's a little hard to tell. The relevant section from Philostratus [2] does mention nymphs, so perhaps this was misconstrued into what we have here? Whatever the case, I'm inclined to say that, sort of along the lines of your suggestion, since we do have a reliable source for the Leimoniads, Leimoniads should be redirected to Nymph, and then Leimakid maybe should be redirected to Mirror of patience? – Michael Aurel (talk) 15:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Leimakides are mentioned in that well-known classical text, the Orphic Argonautica (646). (LSJ entry). (archive.org has the book, but it's still not fully functional and the page won't load - for me at least).
This single reference hardly merits them having their own page. A note in the 'relations and notes' column for Leimonides on the Nymph page really seems like it should suffice. I have no opinion on whether Leimakid should point to Nymph or Mirror of Patience. Genuinely fascinated as to how Connor managed to find that reference, though. ~~ Endlesspumpkin (talk) 18:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Endlesspumpkin: Ah, the Orphic Argonautica – well spotted! I think this answers where these "Leimakids" come from. As the LSJ notes, λειμακίδες is the form which appears in David Ruhnken's edition, whereas Johann Gottfried Jakob Hermann has λιμναίων, and I notice Francis Vian (the most recent and reliable edition) follows manuscript Ω in having λιμνακίδων. Considering these forms, and Vian's translation (Nymphes des Marais), these seem to be marsh nymphs (perhaps an alternative spelling of "Limnad"?) who've here been muddled up with the Leimoniads. – Michael Aurel (talk) 01:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose we're technically into the realm of the verboten here – unless we can find some authority who has thought to comment upon this very specific matter – but your speculation seems entirely reasonable to me (perhaps you could shoot off a quick note to a journal, and in a couple of years we'll be able to cite it...). We could plonk them in their own row in the table, and in the notes column we can explain the source for both of these words and point the reader to the Limnad page for a 'similar' species. Were the Leimakids page not already here, it's the kind of thing I would rather pass over in silence – herding cats is both easier and more enjoyable that classifying nymphs. Endlesspumpkin (talk) 09:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Endlesspumpkin's solution sounds right to me. Josh Milburn (talk) 10:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jhonson Napoleon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a businessman lacking any clear claim of notability and apparently not a GNG pass. Mccapra (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG, wasn't able to find any reliable-source-looking-things that covered the subject of the article that were not thinly veiled press releases Noah 💬 00:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Swedes in Japan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only secondary sources about Swedes in Japan are about two individuals and don't discuss the phenomenon of Swedes living in Japan more widely in depth. Does not meet WP:GNG. AlexandraAVX (talk) 18:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 23:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Tel Aviv truck attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No information provided in the article besides from an infobox -Bloxzge 025 ツCanada — Preceding undated comment added 20:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It happened right near the Glilot military base and Mossad headquarters and thirty injured is excessive by any attack especially in the standards of the modern world--Foetaldiner (talk) 22:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: Very obviously notable. Just from a quick Google search, there is English coverage in Newsweek, ABC, and the NYPost, not to mention the Hebrew-language sources. Noah 💬 00:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Than can you improve it? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 02:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So WP:DINC? Killarnee (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to a related list. I doubt this will pass NEVENT, there are a lot of highly similar instances related to I/P and a lot don't. This doesn't show any signs it will receive future sigcov, and the burst of news coverage when it happens doesn't help notability PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A body has been created. Borgenland (talk) 06:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Every incident that leads to someone dying is not notable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By our standards, many attacks are notable. gidonb (talk) 00:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a notable incident due to the scale of casualties and significant global news coverage. Whizkin (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — There are bad arguments on both sides here. I will note that "No information provided in the article besides from an infobox" is not a proper rationale for deleting an article nor foreign to the nominator. This article is not inherently notable because thirty people were injured, either. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a very easy recommendation to make. There is global coverage and SIGCOV in Israel galore. With 40 injured this will also receive sustained coverage. Even with far less injuries. For good and bad, Israeli media and research go back to such events. Time and again. Also Speedy keep because the nomination defies AFDISNOTCLEANUP and SOFIXIT and no valid reason to delete was brought forward. Supporting a keep and a speedy keep, for different reasons, in the very same opinion as the outcome would be identical. gidonb (talk) 00:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Kotter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unless someone can show how this would meet WP:NPROF, subject is not notable under any other guideline. Putting aside COI and UPE, the sources simply do not go into depth about the subject. Just passing mentions. CNMall41 (talk) 23:29, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not in-depth because the sources just pass a claim. COI, not at all notable. Agreeing with Axad12, MrOllie, CNMall41. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 17:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Extending based on review - more time may be of benefit here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tawker (talk) 22:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. With an h-factor of 48 he just about passes NPROF#C1. Note that for NPROF we don't require extensive external coverage. If he had significant awards it would be a strong keep; at the moment he squeezes by. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mubarak Khwaja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged a long time a go as uncited. I found a source which describes him as a prince https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315165172-20/jochid-ulus-roman-hautala but I don’t know the subject so not sure if the article is true or whether he is notable Chidgk1 (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Providing a second opportunity for the two keep !votes to be refuted (or corroborated by others).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as it covers a key figure in Kazakh history who played an important role in resisting Russian expansion in the 19th century. His contributions provide valuable historical context on Kazakh resistance --Jiaoriballisse (talk) 13:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
List of topics on the Portuguese Empire in Goa-Anjediva, Bombay-Bassein & the East Indies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list of topics related to the Portuguese colonial empire, but only the parts in the East Indies; I see little use for this as a list for navigational purposes when there is already the template {{Portuguese overseas empire}} and other methods of finding pages in this topic area. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 23:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lada Niva Vision (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A car that was never built. Does not seem capable of sustaining an article. Sourcing is just a bunch of "this car is coming" news articles which are substantially similar (and show up any time any car is announced), and then the cancellation. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954: Please don't delete other people's comments on AfDs, even when they disagree with you. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley I did not delete your comment intentionally, I think there was an editing conflict -- if you look at the times we were editing at the same time. My apologies, I would never do that intentionally. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ersel Göral (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a successful businessman who has had a career in airport management. Nothing here indicates notability. A draft also exists. Mccapra (talk) 22:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clinton String Quartet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NBAND / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rainsage (talk) 01:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Glen Campbell Plays 12 String Guitar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find sources to add proving that it meets WP:NALBUM / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 21:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Achilleas Dimitriades (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of an unsuccessful political candidate. He was eliminated after first round voting in which he got 8%. Fails WP:NPOL and not otherwise notable. Mccapra (talk) 21:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

StormEngineC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced since article's creation in 2012. Fails WP:GNG, no indication of notability.

Note: article creator's username and edit history indicates an undeclared WP:COI. Mika1h (talk) 21:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdistan Islamic Relations Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a very small political party that claims a few thousand members and has failed to get anyone elected to anything, securing 0.08% of the vote. Does not pass WP:NCORP. Mccapra (talk) 21:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deeside College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Badly written, barely sourced promotional article about a college that ceased to exist in 2013. At best some elements could be transferred over to a history section in Coleg Cambria. If you look at this edit and compare the section headings with those in this wayback machine snapshot of the college's history, you will see that it is very likely that the content is straight copy/paste copyvio - even though the original content was not archived by wayback machine and is therefore likely lost. However, you can see 100% that the list of college principals is lifted word for word from the the college history page. The content is highly suspect and a proper analysis might show a drastic revdel is needed. Best option is just to go ahead and delete the article. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Wales. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, badly written is not a WP:DELREASON (WP:CONTN). It clearly has the history and can also be converted to a contemporary campus article. Dissolved colleges don't lose notability. Merging all the colleges into Coleg Cambria would be messy as it is a multi-campus merged college, and like merging all of Cambridge's colleges into Cambridge Uni. DankJae 21:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Can you re-read my reasoning above as I just edited it. Sorry. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Would WP:TNT apply? If it is specifically this version of the article needing deletion based on quality/copyvio issues, but the topic remains notable? Ideally needing a full re-write or re-do?
    I'd argue it is still notable, regardless of when it ceased, and while it may not be a separate college anymore, it operates a distinct campus and programme within Coleg Cambria. Always was on my to-do list to convert to a campus and history article. DankJae 22:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Blow it up and start over would be wonderful. In fact I'd help you re-write it from scratch. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional delete on the basis for re-write WP:TNT, but not on notability concerns (otherwise keep), oppose any merge. Del based on lots of potential copyvio revisions and mass unsourced content. Additionally, the article may be converted into the contemporary campus, meaning a re-write may have little resemblance with the current, as well as the sheer amount of review needed for the current unsourced content, so best TNT. Any links to the deleted article should be kept, in anticipation of a revival. Additionally lots of the content dates to a 2010 version (or before), so the sources may be harder to find today for that in-depth content and haven't been added for over a decade. However, still open to a keep and re-write, if there's agreement for the current version to be massively cut if not deleted. DankJae 22:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment TNT is an essay and not policy, but this may be an excellent case for using it anyway (and as IAR is policy, if that is an agreed outcome that improved the encyclopaedia, the fact it is an essay does not mitigate against its use). However, before !voting to delete with no prejudice against immediate recreation, could we sense check the notability? What reliable, independent and secondary sources cover the college from which the new article would be written? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Forwardism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign that this neologism passes WP:NEO or for that matter WP:GNG. The word is used by BMW as a marketing tool and that's what a basic Google search finds (besides a bizarre fandom wiki). The Google books search is more interesting because it does get a few hits, but there's no indication that the word is used in the same sense in all of these contexts. There's certainly no source that studies it specifically as an ideology and no source that mentions "Advancementalism" as a synonym. Pichpich (talk) 20:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At most it is fit for a wiktionary entry, but not an article on wikipedia. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 02:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I don't think it's appropriate for Wiktionary either, since the definition given here doesn't seem to be agreed upon by solid sources. Pichpich (talk) 18:32, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - nothing here.--Gronk Oz (talk) 05:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tele Finland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page and the claims don't appear to be easily WP:V. Could be redirected to Telia Company but Tele Finland doesn't appear to be mentioned at the target. JMWt (talk) 19:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kavaloi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. I'm not seeing refs to add which count towards notability but if be interested if anyone can suggest anything else JMWt (talk) 18:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perati Bridge attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. An attack on a border post as part of a broader invasion is hardly notable, unless something extraordinary happened here or it received coverage for other reasons, which is not in evidence. The battle itself is covered in one sentence. Constantine 18:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Richard the Lion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. Nothing much found to suggest this character in a comic is notable. JMWt (talk) 18:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ireland Eurovision Song Contest entries discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The discography and chart history of a nation's Eurovision entries has no relevance to the country's participation in Eurovision. Beyond the songs being Eurovision entries (which are already covered in more detail at Ireland in the Eurovision Song Contest), how they charted in their country or elsewhere does not have an impact on the nation's participation history nor its success/placement at the contest. Grk1011 (talk) 14:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additional nominated article for the same reasons:

UK Eurovision Song Contest entries discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The basis of this deletion discussion is based in the following policies/guidelines:

  • WP:GNG: The list lacks significant coverage in sources, with most supplied references being the chart positions themselves, with no added context. The article does not establish what grouping all of these songs and chart positions together is trying to prove, show, or discuss.
  • WP:NOTSTATS: The list of one specific statistic about these Eurovision songs only shows how they fared on one specific country's music charts (not even at the contest itself); it lacks context or explanation.
  • WP:LISTCRIT: The list is a synthesis of available information, compiled nowhere else in this level of detail other than on Wikipedia, for which the membership criteria remain somewhat unclear. The point of the article is just to identify a song's placing? To compare? Why only domestic charts? Why do other articles list the album they were on too? What text could be added to provide context without becoming WP:OR? How is this a "discography"?

Grk1011 (talk) 12:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Du-haeng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources. Fails WP:NTRACK. Placed 32nd at one Olympics. Fails WP:BASIC. AusLondonder (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and South Korea. AusLondonder (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some coverage:
    • "[2014 경주국제마라톤]서른에 입문 늦깎이 "아들 위해 뛰었다"" [[2014 Gyeongju International Marathon] A late bloomer who started at age 30 “I ran for my son”]. The Dong-a Ilbo (in Korean). October 20, 2014. (c. 220 words)
    • "늦깎이 마라토너 고양시청 '이두행' 런던行 확정 - 경기신문" [Late bloomer marathon runner Goyang City Hall ‘Lee Du-haeng’]. KGNews. April 10, 2012. (c. 170 words)
  • BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Sport of athletics. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Also placed in the top 8 at continental championships. He did not take up athletics at age 30, but took up marathon near that age. Geschichte (talk) 06:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep via coverage above plus more under subject's Korean name "이두행": "이두행". The bar for NBASIC is met. --Habst (talk) 13:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Which pieces of coverage do you find when finding "more"? Geschichte (talk) 13:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Geschichte, here are some examples:
    --Habst (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Han van den Berg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NSPORT, and has no sources to support any claim of notability. Plasticwonder (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Netherlands at the 1948 Summer Olympics#Rowing per ATD and CHEAP. The article is not notable from the sources in this debate. I could read the second source above, basically a passing mention. The first source may be a but better, yet in any case the article too short to keep. So no need to dive too deep. I did copy what is needed at the target, while slightly improving the ref. Could also be considered a merge without the need to move more content, if we want to indirectly attribute the previous content creators. gidonb (talk) 23:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Arthur H. Marshall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ancestry.com and The Peak Seeker are not reliable. Highpointers.org is the official highpointing organization so should not be used here. The only seemingly reliable source here is The Oregonian. Unless more coverage can be found, I feel like Arthur H. Marshall's achievements are better discussed briefly in the highpointing article instead of in its own article as notability seems weak. The current state of the article is certainly not sufficient and is written poorly. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 15:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.capecodtimes.com/story/news/2000/10/29/for-certain-class-climber-life/51015049007/
https://books.google.com/books?id=BZQSAQAAIAAJ
https://books.google.com/books?id=2vZvAAAAMAAJ
https://www.theday.com/news/20170425/reaching-the-top-of-america/
I believe the in-depth coverage on him in the Oregonian, and multiple sources crediting him with the first in the US to reach all the tops and receiving coverage multiple times spanning years apart is an indication of notability and I feel he meets Wikipedia:SPORTSPERSON
Graywalls (talk) 21:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Although I nominated the article for deletion, I think with some further improvements it can be kept with all these sources. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 22:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore (Andrew Jackson captive) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable individual, but may together with the two other such articles perhaps be merged into one? Barely anything can be said about the individual Theodore, the topic of the article, who died aged 1 or thereabouts. What the articles (and the sources) really are about is Jackson's treatment of or position towards Native Americans. Fram (talk) 12:53, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it does. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 13:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Even though I have trouble seeing how consensus will be reached if people don't include more policy-based reasoning, particularly regarding notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Station, Boston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an electoral ward of just 2,700 people with a town of 45,000 people. All that the article really says is "the ward exists". It does not prove its notability and it is for that complete lack of notability that I am nominating it for deletion. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I see a consensus against keep, but no clear consensus for where the article should be redirected/merged to.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 18:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Felix McBrearty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jack McKenna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Sigcov available - article about subject in Irish Examiner, Leinster Leader, op-ed about subject in Irish Independent (please note the author is not related to the subject in spite of their surname) and Balls.ie. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 18:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Irish Examiner - routine coverage after a victory. /// Kildare Now - more about how he just happened to be the recipient of Paul Lim's nine darter than anything about the man himself. /// Irish Independent - passing mention in an article more concerned with the drinking culture in darts. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 21:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Irish Examiner article actually interviews the subject about stuff further than just his victory and is beyond just the routine coverage of "subject won match". Leinster Leader (Kildare Now) is still sigcov beyond discussing Paul Lim's nine darter in two of the paragraphs. Irish Independent article remains an op-ed that heavily discusses McKenna. Furthermore, coverage is available in depth about McKenna in Dartsnews.com. As well as this, there was a full length article in the Sunday Tribune in 2010 about McKenna which absolutely meets SIGCOV - though the article itself has been taken down, it's been reuploaded by the journalist who wrote the piece here. With these six I think the case for meeting GNG is clear. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 21:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Irish Examiner is blatantly routine coverage after a victory whereby he discusses his preparation for the next game. That's the entire article? /// Kildare Now is almost entirely about Lim's nine darter, with the exception of the final paragraph, where the "significant coverage" consists of a man saying he doesn't drink alcohol. /// Irish Independent is an article where we learn McKenna was, you guessed it, the man who stood behind Paul Lim as he hit the nine darter, we learn that he has a chest infection at the time of writing the article, and that he was once in a minibus that broke down near Drogheda. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 22:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    All three remain articles specifically about the subject - and yes, you might find whatever's mentioned in the op-ed boring, that doesn't really matter in terms of the fact there's been a national newspaper op-ed written with several paragraphs about him. But even taking your definition of WP:ROUTINE (which if it was just "McKenna won this match" and no further comment from or about subject I'd agree with, but it's not, so it's not) at its best and throwing out the three articles you disagree with, that still leaves three other full articles that provide significant coverage of McKenna. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 22:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    An article where 5 paragraphs out of 6 talk about Paul Lim's nine darter is mathematically not specifically about this bloke whatsoever. I never said anything was boring, I just literally described what the Independent article was? How a darts player prepares for his second game after winning his first game is very WP:ROUTINE, which is what that article in the Examiner. The Darts News article is five paragraphs summarising a 34 year career, one paragraph of which is about, yep, you guessed it, Paul Lim's nine-darter. The remaining paragraphs are very much WP:ROUTINE reporting of six matches in his 34 year career. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 22:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Darts, and Ireland. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The Irish Examiner source is routine pre-match hype with roughly a sentence of secondary coverage Red XN. Kildare Now has about two sentences of secondary coverage, with the rest being coverage of Lim, primary, or quotes Red XN. The Independent source is a first-person OpEd; per policy this is considered primary and therefore unusable for GNG. Balls.ie is almost entirely an interview, with the minimal secondary coverage being in the context of Lim's performance Red XN. JoelleJay (talk) 22:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, the British Newspaper Archive appears to have plenty of coverage of him, including mentions such as "Jack McKenna is a household name in Irish sport" and "Jack McKenna is the best darts player Ireland has ever produced". BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Are tabloid newspapers considered reliable sources? All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 00:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Several of those (e.g. randomly selected national Evening Herald and Sunday World) are of the newspaper size tabloid, not that they necessarily engage in tabloid journalism. Someone who has multiple sources attesting him as a national "household name" and "the best darts player" in the nation's history is clearly notable. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Except they do engage in tabloid journalism. Hence my comment. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 09:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Source? BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Troels Rusel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanawat Gaweenuntawong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marshall James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Darts, and Wales. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: as a former WDF World Championship runner-up and World Masters semi-finalist, there appears to be a great deal of significant coverage of the subject in Welsh (Llanelli Star, South Wales Echo) and other (Liverpool Echo, Aberdeen Evening Express) papers, but a lot of it is hidden behind a paywall. If I can get access to these papers later in the week I'll assess the coverage and update my vote; if anyone else has access to them it may be worth a look. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 18:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Registering a keep vote in light of the below comment, but will update further if I get granted access to the newspaper archive for the aforementioned articles. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 21:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Significant coverage here and although my BNA access has expired, here's a story titled "Top of the World: Marshall James", which is almost certainly sigcov. He was second-best at the world championships! BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Is a six paragraph article that summarises a six year career really "significant coverage"? All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 21:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Is a 300+ word article on the then-second-best darts player in the world, as well as what appears to be a feature on 'Top of the World: Marshall James', count for notability? Of course it does. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You keep describing him as being the "second-best darts player in the world" and this is just categorically not true. Are you seriously suggesting he was better than Phil Taylor? Two articles do not make significant coverage, especially when one of which you have admitted you have no idea what it even is. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 23:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You keep describing him as being the "second-best darts player in the world" and this is just categorically not true. – I'll admit I'm not super familiar with darts, but didn't James finish as the runner-up at the World Championships? Wouldn't being runner-up at the World Championships be second best in the world? And two articles can absolutely be significant coverage; the general notability guideline says that's all that's required for notability (two pieces of coverage). What do you think the odds are that a story titled, "Top of the World: Marshall James", is not significant coverage? BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    He finished runner-up at a (not the) World Championship and then proceeded to do absolutely nothing of note ever again. Does a darts player from Llanelli having potentially one article in a Llanelli newspaper, and a six paragraph article on a darts website, really count for notability? All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 00:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Does having significant coverage from two independent outlets for a runner-up at a World Darts Championship count for notability? Absolutely if you go by GNG, which only requires two significant sources. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    So, to keep up-to-date. That's one "significant" source. And one source you freely admit you haven't read. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 00:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We're allowed to use common sense. The odds that both the 'Top of the World' source is insignificant and that there's no further coverage of him anywhere is incredibly small, especially given that Ser! has found paywalled articles in four additional newspapers. That you're unable to answer whether you've done any sort of WP:BEFORE search at all for over one hundred darts articles you've rapidly nominated or proposed for deletion is concerning as well. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Nice personal attack there. Not content with doing it on my own talk page you now choose to do it here too! All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 01:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Pointing out that you've refused on three occasions to answer the basic question of whether or not you've done a BEFORE search is not a personal attack... BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You assuming that I haven't, and constantly repeating the claim, is a personal attack. What on earth makes you think I haven't? Because you found that the British library has an article in the Llanelli Post about him from 27 years ago? 🤣 All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 09:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @ItsKesha: What on earth makes you think I haven't?because I asked "Are you doing any sort of WP:BEFORE search at all?" – and you responded that the articles are old, and then I asked "Are you doing any sort of WP:BEFORE search at all?" – and you responded that I need to AGF – and then I asked "Are you doing any sort of WP:BEFORE search at all?" – and you told me to get off your talk page – and then here you called it a personal attack, and when asked ... you responded that "What on earth makes you think I haven't? 🤣" – this absolute refusal to answer the question while nominating / proposing hundreds of articles for deletion is disruptive. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    OK 👍 All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 01:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nick Fullwell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and lacks SIGCOV. I found this but it isn't enough. Dougal18 (talk) 14:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Spedding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Murray (darts player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. Dougal18 (talk) 15:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Norman Jnr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Dewsbury (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Derry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gavin Carlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Steffen Siepmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fabian Herz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Steyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stilt-Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This got restored recently after its prior AfD last year. It was restored per new sourcing, but this sourcing is nowhere near significant enough to verify separate notability. I've discussed this on the talk page with the editor who revived the article, and I will transclude the source analysis I left there for simplicity's sake:

1. A Comicbook.com listicle which gives a single paragraph among a large number of other characters. The actual paraphrasing of the source in the article is nearly as long if not longer than the source's own, and the actual source itself is really only saying "He's a fan favorite" with little to no other additional commentary beyond that. This source's importance I feel is being blown out of proportion in the current article as it stands.

2. A Game Rant source which doesn't contribute to notability per Wikipedia:VALNET. While there's an ongoing discussion for this, until that discussion's come to a close, the current policy should still be adhered to. Game Rant is a low quality content farm a large bulk of the time, and cannot be considered a good indicator of subject notability.

3. A MovieWeb listicle, which, while alright, is still only one half-decent source in what is evidently a character with very little Wikipedia:SIGCOV or coverage independently focusing on the character. MovieWeb is additionally owned by Valnet, but I am admittedly unsure if it is also a content farm to the same degree Valnet usually is with sources like Game Rant or CBR, or if it actually publishes solid content consistently like some other valid Valnet sources like Collider and TheGamer.

The only other source here that was a notable addition is a book source, which is only used to verify plot information, and thus does not seem to contribute toward notability. I left this detailed summary to the reviver on the talk page of the article, and received no response. Given the controversial nature of another BLAR as a result, I've elected to take this back to AfD to settle this. There's really only about one source that seems to give any degree of notability, and it's small and seemingly the only one to exist. As it stands, there doesn't seem to be any degree of substantial improvement since the last AfD, and this should be redirected back to the list Stilt-Man had been redirected to previously. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @BOZ, who revived the article, for input in this discussion. Additionally pinging @Industrial Insect, @Piotrus, @Rtkat3, and @BoomboxTestarossa, who participated in the previous AfD, for input. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I don't believe the new sourcing is strong enough to warrant restoring the article (mostly being from Valnet content farms), although I'm not sure about the validity of the physical sources. Industrial Insect (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abílio Vieira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar case to Idelfonso da Silva. Brief career for Timor-Leste but with no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. My searches only yielded database sources like NFT, which do not meet notability requirements any more. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Chain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. Article was tagged for UPE by others and creator is indeffed as a sock. Article content is just basic resume/CV type material. I translated the 4 sources although do not have a full understanding of the context of the websites. Two are so flowery that they appear to be self-written. Could not find even one GNG qualifying reference. North8000 (talk) 17:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bertolomeu Verdial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite his cap for Timor-Leste, I can't find anything that might count towards WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. Several players with 1 international cap have been deleted recently as a cap is no longer an exemption from GNG. My own WP:BEFORE found nothing other than database sources. Article creator is indefinitely blocked. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Armando Varela (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite his two appearances at international level, I can't find any evidence of a WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG pass. The best that I can find is Dantri, a mere squad listing. Several players with 1 or 2 caps for Timor-Leste have been deleted recently for the same reasons. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Tavantius (talk) 18:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LLCC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Of this disambiguation, one is a red link, meaning only two topics (a part of a tropical cyclone and a community college) are covered by this. As Wikipedia's guidelines on disambiguation pages states that these types of articles need a minimum of three topics to exist, I believe it should be deleted. Tavantius (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just saw the links you added. In that case, I'll close it as the nominator... Tavantius (talk) 18:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
List of discontinued Guinness World Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Starting AfD page after objection to deletion Dingers5Days (talk) 16:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe this article meets WP:NLIST. There are reliable sources mentioning a specific discontinued record, but not as a list. I have only found articles from Mental Floss [10], Grunge [11], and Cracked [12]. Cracked has been considered generally unreliable, and the other 2 are not listed on WP:RSP. Dingers5Days (talk) 16:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just because the other two are not listed at RSP doesn't mean they are unreliable. ―Panamitsu (talk) 21:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Colleˊ Kharis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a musician and filmmaker, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for either musicians or filmmakers. The attempted notability claim here is minor film and music awards that aren't prominent enough to clinch an instant notability pass in the absence of solidly reliable sourcing, but the article is referenced almost entirely to primary sources rather than reliable ones -- YouTube, Q&A interviews in which he's talking about himself in the first person, music metaverifying its own existence on Spotify or Apple Music, marketing content self-published by his own record label, his own social media accounts, etc. -- and the very few marginally (but not solidly) reliable sources are not enough to get him over WP:GNG all by themselves if the sourcing is 95 per cent garbage otherwise.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much better references than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vegantics (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Trump rally at Madison Square Garden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTNEWS and WP:TOOSOON. We don't need a page for every rally held during an election season, only if they are particularly notable (i.e. his rally in Butler, PA). I don't see anything that makes this one specifically notable; sure, there's been plenty coverage on the bizzare racist remarks made at it but that happens every time. CoconutOctopus talk 15:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy that this article has been improved enough to keep; if coverage does fizzle out in future then we can relist but consensus is for Keep. I'd close myself but as there's a few Draftify votes I can't. CoconutOctopus talk 07:28, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. Let’s wait until we get more information about the rally to put into the article.
Considering Tony Hinchecliffe’s comments could potentially cost Trump Pennsylvania, I think this rally will be looked back on as as a major event in the election.
I think the article should stay. ZachM097 (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but Wait until after the election concludes before re-assessing it's notability. Let's not rush to delete an article with plenty of coverage based on lack of WP:LASTING notability which may very well develop. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now per GeorgeMemulous and Great Mercian, too soon to say it's not notable. HappyWith (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I think we should be able to get a close now. Seems like no way it’s gonna get deleted now. HappyWith (talk) 14:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify is the best solution IMO if there are concerns about WP:TOOSOON IMO.
-1ctinus📝🗨 18:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Important rally with huge political blowback, covered heavier than most by the media. Personisinsterest (talk) 20:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This rally has gained substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. CJ-Moki (talk) 20:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify Right now, the premise of the article follows Democratic Party rhetoric that seems to be false. Specifically, that the location of the rally was somehow an intentional callback to the 1939 rally, a sentiment spearheaded by Hillary Clinton before the rally even started, and thereby the content of the rally can be assumed to be racist. But nothing in coverage suggests that there was directly racist language at the rally. Comments by Tony Hinchcliffe are, as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said on Twitter, was merely crude humor, that it's problematic nature was the context of Donald Trump's poor handling of Puerto Rico. Furthermore, even the comedian noted that the crowd was not enjoying his comedy ("this is a groan-y little crowd tonight"), and surrounding information indicates that the sentiments were not representative of the rally's purpose. While other speakers did say problematic things about the value of IQ, none of it was related to race. Neither were comments about illegal immigrants being largely composed of criminals necessarily racist, as the false narrative that illegal immigrants are largely composed of criminals does not issue directly from race. Essentially, the notability of the article is based from in-direct or objectively false claims, even if they do come from sources that are normally credible. But clearly not credible in this case, as not one of the sources was capable of giving a single example of racist language at the rally. If their articles were Wikipedia articles, we'd have to stick some [be specific] and [clarify] tags around statements that we are here using as a source. The fact that nobody noticed this is worrying to me. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 20:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep, with the important concession that the article must be restructured to draw greater attention to the historical paralells with Hitler’s Nuremberg rallies, which are the primary reason for the rally’s notability. The rally is notable for its open, unapologetic endorsement of Nazism and fascism by Trump and was regarded as such by virtually all mainstream commentators all of which used the words “Nazi” and “Fascist” in discussing the rally. Since this is precisely what makes the rally notable according to reliable sources, we must reorient the article to reflect the analogy to the 1939 nazi rally at MSG and Hitler’s nuremberg rallies, similar events which also have their own articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fearless Speech (talkcontribs) 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was no open endorsement of Nazism or fascism by Trump or any of the rally's speakers. That news articles used the word Nazi and Fascist is because of Hillary Clinton's drawing the parallel as a diminutive, not because there was a serious reason to draw the parallel. IronMaidenRocks (talk) 21:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This rally was more significant than Trump's other rallies and has strong parallels to the 1939 Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden. Additionally, this rally was unique in that it was not designed for campaigning but rather to activate Trump's base for after the election. MattEditor02 (talk) 22:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify - WIKIPEDIA:NOTNEWS WIKIPEDIA:CRYSTAL The comments made at this rally were certainly horrendous and inexcusable, but this is not the first (or final) rally where Trump or his guest speakers have made notably bigoted comments which have been reported in the media. It is possible that this rally will continue to be discussed in the media and it may even have lasting impacts on the 2024 election (October Surprise perhaps), but until that can be definitively demonstrated or reported on, I don't think it merits having an article. Flangalanger (talk) 22:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I am willing to change my stance to Weak Keep, as the article has been rewritten to include more sources and now has actual meat to it. That said, the section about Tony Hinchcliffe's speech is a pretty significant chunk of the article and if coverage of this rally fizzles out in a day or two, then I think merging it into Hinchcliffe's article would be acceptable, too. Flangalanger (talk) 02:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - front page coverage on just about every major newspaper. Guettarda (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You do realize Basket of deplorables is a Good article on Wikipedia, yeah? ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i've seen this guy's last account get banned Nohorizonss (talk) 05:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
lets see more bombastic rallies or another coup attempt Nohorizonss (talk) 05:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You don't delete an article because you believe the coverage surrounding it to be overblown. If anything, that is a strong indictment for keeping the article. 80.1.141.100 (talk) 13:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - The article is certainly relevant at the moment. Whether or not it will remain relevant may decide whether it should remain as a permanent article. That can not be decided before the rally's actual impact on the election has been considered. I do have concerns about the statement that "top Trump advisors Mark Milley, John Kelly and Jim Mattis had recently described Trump in such terms." when the citation, and general knowledge, refer only to John Kelly making such a statement.
   The move to remove the article when it is currently relevant appears to be politically motivated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:CA00:D600:5D56:5EA4:34E0:419D (talk) 06:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] 
They wrote a letter recently Nohorizonss (talk) 06:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, but way to assume bad faith! CoconutOctopus talk 07:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Enter (upcoming film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any news coverage of this film more recent than what is present in the article. I didn't even find any sources on the name change. Does not appear to be notable given current limited coverage. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 15:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TCDD Subdivision 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think there are too many articles about Turkish rail. This has been tagged for years as unsourced and the Turkish article is strangely cited. If readers might wish to know the regions we could link from Turkish State Railways to https://static.tcdd.gov.tr/webfiles/userfiles/files/sebekebildirimi/2025/ing/3219.pdf where they are shown in the lowest map Chidgk1 (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It can be summed up in the TCDD article. (Central Data Bank (talk) 18:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Andrew Knack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a politician, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NPOL #2. To be fair, Edmonton is a large and prominent enough city that its city councillors could qualify for articles if they were substantive and properly sourced -- but the only attempts at content about his work on council shown here are "he participated in various committees relevant to city governance" (i.e. did his job) and "utilized social media platforms to inform constituents about local issues and gather public feedback" (i.e. did his job), without stating or sourcing anything about the impact of his work.
We would need to see things like specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects his work had on the development of the city, evidence that his notability nationalizes beyond just Edmonton alone, and on and so forth, but there's absolutely none of that here.
And for sourcing, this is referenced entirely to one primary source (reduplicated as four distinct footnotes for no obvious reason) that isn't support for notability at all, and two deadlinked (but recoverable) hits of run of the mill local coverage of his decision to step down and not run for reelection next year, which is not enough to get him over NPOL's requirement for significant press coverage all by itself if it's the only non-primary sourcing on the table.
Simply existing as a city councillor is in no way "inherently" notable enough to exempt the article from having to be a lot more substantive, and a lot better sourced, than this. Bearcat (talk) 14:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand but instead of turing this article into a draft give me 24 hours and i'll have this fixed New poltics (talk) 02:50, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Roman Miroshnichenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a vanity publisher or a PR platform. Refbombed spam for non notable individual. Has a massive primary sourced laundry list of so called awards but they are not major awards (or for the most part remotely credible). Last Afd closed no consensus largely on the validity of the Independent Music Awards (IMAs) (now deleted) but they are not a major award and are not even a notable award. None of the many listed charts are GOODCHARTS. Refbombed sources lack independent coverage in reliable sources. Curated by a single SPA who despite being blocked is still updating this PR. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lol 'prestigious' is a word that barely exists outside press releases - if you see it in a news item it's a giveaway that the piece is probably churnalism. Things which are genuinely prestigious (Nobel, Emmy etc.) are never described as 'prestigious'. Mccapra (talk) 16:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Charley (Andrew Jackson captive) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sad story which may be a paragraph in some other article perhaps (but where?), but not a notable subject on its own. Fram (talk) 10:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: President Andrew Jackson was somewhat unique in his adoption of native American children. All of these should be kept: Theodore, Charley and Lyncoya. The issue with merging is that it would be too large for many readers. This is a substantive part of Jackson's life and should be kept. — Maile (talk) 15:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aside. I object to the word "captive". That doesn't jibe with this article or Theodore's. Neither was captured by Jackson, and it seems to me to be a POV slur against him. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Clarityfiend It's funny, after reading the sources published in the last 20 years, I think I object to calling Lyncoya his "adopted son" but that's mostly me being emo and a different discussion that probably happens on generational timescales. ANYWAY, I assumed it would get moved at some point and I am very excited to see what another brain thinks of. My only caveat is that Theodore is not confirmed to have been Muscogee, and based on cultural norms of the time, was very possibly given as a gift/tribute by an ally (see Charley), so the title shouldn't be Theodore (Muscogee). I don't think it abrogates him being a captive that Jackson didn't personally throw a net over him and carry him home--Jackson had possession of a bunch of orphaned babies that didn't belong to him because he was a local warlord running a race war--but it doesn't need to be in the title of the article. But I don't know what else to use. Halp? jengod (talk) 14:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • ADD: We could arguably merge them both into Lyncoya as subsections. I didn't do that in the first place because these two were separate human people with distinct stories and their burial in brittle letters and footnotes for much of the past 200 years was not accidental. They were very intentionally excluded from the narrative. jengod (talk) 14:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC
Clarityfiend,Jengod: Another thought comes to mind here: we look at this through the eyes of our era. There is a old tradition in Hawaii, even now, called Hānai (informal adoption) whereby parents gave their children to others to be raised. One of the reasons in earlier years was because you weren't likely to go to war against someone who was raising your child. Hānai is still practiced there, for a variety of reasons. We don't know the background (do we?) of why Jackson got these native American children. But there might have been reasoning for it. — Maile (talk) 04:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for more input and perhaps a more clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Tails Wx 13:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joey Luft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear case of WP:NOTINHERITED. As evidenced in all the refs. TheLongTone (talk) 13:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Despoilers of the Golden Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. Nothing much found which could be added which would count towards the notability criteria JMWt (talk) 13:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if there isn't anything, should be merged into Takeoff!, where this story was later collected PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Crazy Bus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable besides its brief appearance on Angry Video Game Nerd. Fails WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 13:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This was deleted before with far less to establish notability (and I would have agreed). Having recreated the page, I would now argue that there is more notability to the game than just AVGN. The soundtrack is regarded by multiple outlets as notable for its bad quality, and a Venezuelan university report mentions its legacy of bringing attention to games in Venezuela. Whether AVGN promoting it led to more people paying attention shouldn't imo be a disqualifier. JSwift49 20:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC) Note to closing admin: JSwift49 (talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]
Keep. A decent amount of sources demonstrated its independent notability, even if the article does require some rewrites to be in a more readable state.
By the way, article had been marked with copyright violations due to the article previously hosting lyrics to a song from Arthur which is obviously still copyrighted and the lyrics are still in article history. It has no effect on this article's deletion. MimirIsSmart (talk) 11:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okinawa City Stadium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page. Nothing much found which suggests notability outside of FC Ryukyu JMWt (talk) 13:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Does appear to be a historic venue, although its Japanese article is poor with sources. A quick Google search in Japanese about its history does not reveal much (although my Japanese comprehension is poor, so if anyone more fluent in it does show coverage I may change my opinion). Takipoint123 (talk) 14:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Murder of Yafim Weinstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. No indication of notability. Common occurence. scope_creepTalk 09:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment several of the sources in this article are SIGCOV, so it definitely does not fail that. Sigcov being defined as it is in the guideline as content that "addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content." Whether it passes WP:NEVENT is a different matter. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I agree with PARAKANYAA that there is plenty of SIGCOV. I would like to see more lasting yet, according to nom, the problem is SIGCOV. No such problem. gidonb (talk) 23:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After Pharaoh of the Wizards's research, I feel better about LASTING. Kudos for identifying so many good sources, Pharaoh! I had seen MUCH MORE SIGCOV, in Hebrew, in the 2009–2016 range. gidonb (talk) 22:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Hebrew Wikipedia is not even referenced. And going around putting text in uppercase is the typical fare from yourself. scope_creepTalk 16:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A few words in uppercase come really handy. Folks can quickly see where you put your emphasis. It's respectful to fellow-Wikipedians, who are also plowing through large amounts of information and are trying to make good sense of it. Now you say something about a lack of referencing on Hewiki. Can you put that comment on the talk page over there? It's a bit out of context here. I can make sure that the fine reference it has also is included here. gidonb (talk) 22:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. gidonb (talk) 22:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

References

  1. ^ Lappin, Yaakov (30 November 2009). "Taxi driver found dead in cab in North". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
  2. ^ "Nazareth Imam Convicted of Inciting Terror". Israel National News. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
  3. ^ Shay, S. (2017). Somalia in Transition Since 2006. Taylor & Francis. p. 1-PT87. ISBN 978-1-351-48876-1. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
  4. ^ Azriel, Guy (28 June 2010). "7 Nazareth residents indicted for attacks against Jews, Christians". CNN. CNN. Archived from the original on 9 September 2014. Retrieved 8 September 2014.
  5. ^ Ashkenazi, Eli (15 July 2010). "Shin Bet Arrests Eight Israeli Arabs for Illicit Arms Trading". Haaretz.com. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
  • Comment The problem with the coverage is the WP:ROUTINE nature of a generic event, a taxi driver killed, that happens as a regular event all over the planet and has been happening with Jews and other folk for centuries. There is not a single thing makes this standout event as anything special, yet it has been elevated in a manner that doesn't fit. That is the reason I sent it for delete. We record the mundane, the mediocre and the generic on here and we don't know how to get rid of this trash. Here is one [40] in reverse. scope_creepTalk 04:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Getting a lot of 403's and a couple of passing mention on this entirely routine report of murder. I cant seem to see them. I'll try in the morning again but it does seem complete mundane, mediocre and generic reporting. scope_creepTalk 02:25, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 13:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make it notable either. Another common occurence on a routine event. scope_creepTalk 07:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Adventures in a City that does not Exist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, does not appear to have received notable coverage in English or Russian (WP:GNG). While it was produced at a notable film studio and involved some significant Soviet actors such as Nikolai Grinko and Valery Nosik playing main roles, it does not appear to be considered a significant part of their careers and thus does not satisfy the guidelines at WP:FILM.--Анатолий Росдашин (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Er nesto (talk) 12:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC) Keep: Why should this article be deleted? It is not spam, it is in fact a notable Soviet picture - I do not see any reason why this should be removed from Wikipedia.[reply]

Electoral cycle of Turkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If this was cited I would suggest merging it into elections in Turkey but it has been tagged uncited for years maybe it should just be deleted as I think it is important for electoral info here to be correct in order to support the democratic process Chidgk1 (talk) 10:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 12:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Pitts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:VICTIM. (Harry Pitts (footballer) should be moved here.) Maybe he could be merged to History of the London Underground? Clarityfiend (talk) 10:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No clear consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, per TaoT. A standalone article is not warranted, especially when the subject can be better contextualized in other articles. JoelleJay (talk) 17:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Timeline of Kilgore, Texas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly conceived "timeline" article for a small city (pop. 13K) with no significant events being listed to justify the need for a "timeline". This is the type of thing we can spin out for communities where there's actual substance for the list to contain, but it isn't a thing that every town or city in the world automatically gets as a matter of course -- but apart from "Establishment of Kilgore College", referenced to Kilgore College's own self-published website about itself rather than a WP:GNG-worthy news article, this otherwise consists exclusively of random population updates with no other significant or properly sourced events listed.
The creator of this has also tried to arbitrarily create a full-on Kilgore-specific WikiProject without going through the proper processes for that (or justifying why a small city with a population of just 13,000 people would need its own full-on WikiProject in the first place), which isn't a deletion rationale in and of itself but does suggest that they need some education in how Wikipedia actually works.
No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when there's substantive content to list, but we would need to see a lot more than just community population estimates. Bearcat (talk) 12:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WeirdNAnnoyed, would probably group History of Kilgore, Texas and Sports in Kilgore as well, as I think it could reasonably be included as part of the history and sports portions of the article. reppoptalk 22:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough content for a timeline article. History page serves it just fine. -1ctinus📝🗨 22:19, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stockport, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indications are that this was a railroad station and not a settlement. Mangoe (talk) 11:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This one probably merits retention since it seems to have been a small but real town in years past, as noted in county maps and plat books from 1903,1904,1908, 1938, etc. There’s also a fair amount of newspaper coverage from the early 20th century, like this interesting tidbit from the Muncie Evening Press on 26 October 1900:

    "Stockport, a little town six miles northwest of Muncie, which since yesterday has been located on the C., I. & E. road, has other claims to distinction than that being a railroad town. It is the home of William McKinley, cousin to the president, who bears the same name..."

    The town seems to have had at least a Baptist church, a school, a general store (robbed repeatedly [41][42]), and a railway station[43], with other articles noting things like unrest over a local killing[44] and other lesser events. Whenever time permits I'd be happy to incorporate some of these pieces into the article. ╠╣uw [talk] 15:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ilias El Ghamarti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having done some research, it doesn't look like this person has had a notable football career. Claims like he has played for Kidderminster Harriers could not be verified; he played for a team that competed in the Dutch first level, but it was already March 2019 at that stage, by which time the club was in the fourth tier. On top of this, there is a real lack of significant coverage. C679 11:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 13:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kei Okawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Playing 14 football matches in Singapore is a weak claim to notability. The sources are not enough to rectify that and as such he fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte (talk) 11:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Alaska Gold Rush (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a valid dab page. None of the other entries (two other gold rushes in Alaska and a TV series titled Gold Rush: Alaska) qualifies. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Pitts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another WP:NACTOR fail. Lacking in significant, high-profile roles. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in favor of keeping the article. Google seems to think he's noteworthy enough that you can toggle between "overview," "Movies" and "TV shows" when you search his name. Iowamutt (talk) 01:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hits aren't enough. See WP:LOTSOFGHITS. Find some substantial sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria, which says:

    People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.

    • If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.

    Sources

    1. Squires, Chase (2006-03-28). "As an actor, Sarasota native Greg Pitts' claim to fame is a bit part in the cult film Office Space. But that could change if ABC's Sons & Daughters becomes a hit. Oh, that face" (pages 1 and 2). Tampa Bay Times. Archived from the original (pages 1 and 2) on 2024-10-26. Retrieved 2024-10-26 – via Newspapers.com.

      The article notes: "The name Greg Pitts might not mean much to most people. The 1992 University of South Florida grad hasn't reached the household-name level of stardom. But plenty of people know his face. A bit part in a quirky cult movie seven years ago cemented Pitts in pop culture as one of Hollywood's memorable louts. ... His next big chance—as a different kind of lout—is playing out now on television in ABC's offbeat comedy Sons & Daughters. Pitts, a 36-year-old Sarasota County native, plays Whitey, a dumb lug with a soft spot for his son. ... Pitts didn't set out to become an actor. He found the stage during his senior year in high school, but he went to USF as a business major. He made the decision to go pro during an accounting class, and after graduating in 1992 he joined a traveling comedy troupe, hoping for a break."

    2. Salman, Josh (2014-02-24). "Actor, famous for "Office Space" scene, takes on real estate in Sarasota County". Sarasota Herald-Tribune. Archived from the original on 2024-07-13. Retrieved 2024-10-26.

      The article notes: "Greg Pitts is trying to make a new name for himself in Southwest Florida real estate. The actor — famous for an unforgettable scene in the cult comedy “Office Space” — recently moved back to his hometown of Venice to follow in the footsteps of his family and begin a second career as a Realtor. ... Pitts was born at Sarasota Memorial Hospital in 1970 — growing up in the Sorrento Shores community that his grandfather developed. His father runs a real estate business — which his brother later joined — in Osprey."

    3. Cox, Billy (2006-11-13). "It's what fits, with Pitts. Venice High School grad, working Hollywood actor Gret Pitts makes his 'Oh face' as he awaits release of 'Idiocracy'". Sarasota Herald-Tribune. Archived from the original on 2024-10-26. Retrieved 2024-10-26.

      The article notes: "A member of the Venice High School Class of 1988 and a University of South Florida graduate, Greg Pitts has a minor "Idiocracy" role as a cameraman near the end of the film. "Office Space" aficionados will remember him for the "Oh face" lines he delivered with frat-house relish in Judge's wry take on corporate hell ... The USF drama major left for Tinseltown shortly after the Northridge earthquake fractured Southern California in 1994. Without so much as a let's-do-lunch contact in his wallet, Pitts found himself paying rent in a skanky Hollywood Boulevard neighborhood stalked by dopers, hookers and kung-fu brigades of Guardian Angels prowling for trouble with their red berets. In 2002, as his persistence began paying off with commercial work, Pitts created a Web site to post career updates for family and friends. The result is a sojourn of elation and despair, with pit stops at Verizon commercials and Allstate ads, and guest spots on "CSI" and "Grey's Anatomy" (Jerry O'Malley, George's brother). ... Pitts credits his parents, Lauden and Carolyn Pitts of Nokomis, for bolstering his fragile spirits during the lean, strange years. Dad actually encouraged him to move to Hollywood."

    4. Deggans, Eric (2000-10-31). "The long road to "Normal, Ohio'". Tampa Bay Times. Archived from the original on 2024-10-26. Retrieved 2024-10-26.

      The article notes: "Pitts, who holds a 1992 theater degree from the University of South Florida, is the only actor besides Goodman to appear in both versions of the show and applauds the revamp."

    5. Handelman, Jay (1998-03-24). "'Damon' Gives Actor His Break". Sarasota Herald-Tribune. Archived from the original on 2024-10-26. Retrieved 2024-10-26.

      The article notes: " Greg Pitts was sitting in an accounting class one day at the University of South Florida when he had one of those life-changing moments. ... After graduating from USF, Pitts moved to California where he studied with the Groundlings, the famed improvisational comedy troupe whose alumni include Paul Reubens (Pee-wee Herman). ... So Pitts started working a variety of jobs - House of Blues, production assistant, Blockbuster video - that gave him time to take classes and audition and also provided fodder for great stories."

    6. Bolduc, Douglas A. (1998-03-21). "VHS grad makes sitcom debut Sunday". Venice Gondolier Sun. Archived from the original on 2024-10-26. Retrieved 2024-10-26.

      The article notes: "Greg Pitts makes his television sitcom debut Sunday. The Venice High School graduate will share the small screen with television and movie stars Damon Wayans and David Alan Grier when the Fox Network premieres "Damon" at 8: 30 p.m. on WTVT Channel 13. ... Pitts earned his VHA diploma in 1988. He took acting classes as a senior, but the former class clown said he could never work up the courage to audition for a VHS production."

    7. Ridge, Kari K. (1998-03-20). "USF grad channels energies toward TV role. Greg Pitts, a former class clown once stymied by stage fright, now appears in DAMON, a Fox sitcom that premieres Sunday". Tampa Bay Times. Archived from the original on 2024-10-26. Retrieved 2024-10-26 – via Newspapers.com.

      The article notes: "Pitts, 28, grew up in the Osprey community of Sarasota, where the self-proclaimed class clown was always too scared to act in school plays. ... After graduating from Sarasota High School, he set out to earn a business degree from the University of South Florida. But he realized during his freshman year that business was not his life's ambition. ... Pitts took a role in a USF summer theater class performance of An Italian Straw Hat. ... After earning a theater degree in 1992, he acted in ..."

    8. Huskey, Judy (2006-02-05). "Venice High earns an 'A' for literacy celebration". Sarasota Herald-Tribune. Archived from the original on 2024-10-26. Retrieved 2024-10-26.

      The article notes: "Greg Pitts, son of Lauden and Carolyn Pitts of Nokomis, and a graduate of Venice High School and the University of South Florida's theatre program, will be in this enviable space today when promos runs for his new sitcom on ABC called "Sons and Daughters.""

    9. Westfahl, Gary (2015). A Day in a Working Life: 300 Trades and Professions through History. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-Clio. ISBN 978-1-61069-402-5. Retrieved 2024-10-26 – via Google Books.

      The book notes: "If asked which is the most desirable profession-being a film actor, or being a real estate agent—almost everyone would opt for the glamorous Hollywood profession. Yet Greg Pitts (1970–) would beg to differ. After a career that included a memorable cameo in the film Office Space (1999) and a 2005 recurring role in the series Grey's Anatomy, Pitts decided to return to his home state of Florida and work alongside his brother and father as a real estate agent. With his acting experience, he should prove especially effective in persuading clients to purchase homes."

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Greg Pitts to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 09:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish tango music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found some sources such as https://www.idildergisi.com/ozet.php?dili=2&ref=1619560991&did=241 but am not sure notable enough Chidgk1 (talk) 10:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propel (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

limited notability, as it primarily covers product details and lacks significant independent sources establishing its importance beyond being a Gatorade product line. Additionally, the content largely overlaps with Gatorade's main article, offering minimal unique information that justifies a standalone entry. Moarnighar (talk) 11:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wanamaker, Kempton and Southern 65 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability. This internally contradictory or confusing article (e.g. was it donated in 1970, acquired in 1972, or donated in 1972?) has mainly passing mentions, with the only somewhat substantial source a photography book "Classic Locomotives: Steam and Deisel[SIC] Power in 700 Photographs". The actual source for the article is this unreliable site [45] with some text taken literally from it. An editor tried to redirect this page to Wanamaker, Kempton and Southern Railroad#Motive power, which may be a good WP:ATD but needs to be decided here since it has been reversed. Fram (talk) 10:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Afd doesn't just seem to be an WP:IDONTLIKEIT, it's an WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT, see User talk:Trainsandotherthings#Wanamaker, Kempton and Southern 65. That comes down to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143#Australian_railroad_IP, a ban on an unpopular IP editor. This article was not created by an IP. If their allegation is that Insomniac187 (talk · contribs) is a banned sock, then I believe we have an SPI process for dealing with that. The correct response is to investigate that SPI first, not this 'round up the usual suspects' approach. We certainly don't blank existing articles without even discussing that through the article talk:, or by notifying involved editors.
Sourcing here mostly rests on a book by Brian Solomon (we should perhaps have an article on Brian Solomon) who is a very well known railway author and certainly WP:RS. I do not have that particular book, nor has the nominator. The other source is a good but very PRIMARY photo collection on the personal website of one of the long-term drivers of the railroad involved. This is far from a 'passing mention'. Yes, it's PRIMARY. But nor are we making the "extraordinary claims" here mentioned above. For the existence and basic history of a loco on a modern tourist railway, this is adequate sourcing. If US makers like H.K. Porter are anything like the UK makers, there are also plenty of erudite texts that would cover the design of this class and the building records of this batch of locos. If this were a Bagnall or a Stephenson loco, or a small industrial saddle tank here in South Wales, my own bookshelves would source that in moments – but if I can't do that for the US, surely there are other editors who can? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Andy Dingley, please check again who started this AfD. I have nothing at all to do with your aspersions about IPs, socks, dislike of the creator, ... Once that is done, I will address your other misconceptions or misleading statements. Fram (talk) 14:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please comment on the article and the AfD, not personalising this into attacks on anyone who disagrees with it. Nor have I even mentioned you. Not everything on WP is about you. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Please comment on the article and the AfD, not personalising this into attacks on anyone who disagrees with it." after your previous post about the nom and the nature of this AfD? Oh well, that goes with your claim about "the other source" being "far from a passing mention". That sources wasn't in the article so wasn't included in my comment about passing mentions; as you well know, as I brought this very source to your attention in the AfD nom, and you then added it to the article. It is a source by a WK&S volunteer, so has no influence on the notability question beneath this AfD. The question is not about verifiability, not about "extraordinary claims", but about WP:NOTABILITY. The Solomon book, where you so impersonally stated "I do not have that particular book, nor has the nominator"; er, it is available right here, at least for me I can access the text about the WK&S 65 without any problems. Fram (talk) 14:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe you are in the US. I am not. Google Books for me does not let me read the relevant pages of that book, I cannot know how much of it you can see. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you seriously accusing me of wanting to delete articles solely based on their author? That is not my stance. I offered my opinion on the subject's notability, and that had zero to do with who authored it. I don't care if Vladimir Putin personally wrote the article, I'm going to evaluate it based on how it meets or does not meet GNG. Based on my interpretation of our policies and guidelines, it does not meet GNG. Please strike your aspersion directed against me. I am also very disappointed you thought it appropriate to link a discussion on my talk page and implicitly make accusations against me without even having the decency to notify me. I would much like if you took your own advice: "Please comment on the article and the AfD, not personalising this into attacks on anyone who disagrees with it."
As for the sourcing, since you linked my talk, you should have seen that Solomon's book dedicates two sentences to the locomotive. That's not significant coverage. I never asserted he was not a reliable source, in fact I have used his works in a number of my articles. I asserted the coverage does not meet WP:SIGCOV. I am disappointed that you ignore that. I expected better from an editor of your tenure than this.
Anyways, redirect to Wanamaker, Kempton and Southern Railroad. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, get off your high horse. You have already AfD'ed this article creator's other articles at Union Pacific 9000 and Dieselmotive Company, Inc.. I am not required to notify you and if you're busy discussing article deletion with another editor there are tells in the writing style that match the IP's editing style (and not through either AfD or even the article's talk: page) then I expect you to be aware of our regular practices that you'll at least notice an AfD page on it.
I don't even particularly disagree with you. If think this IP is socking, then file an SPI and do it properly. But we don't work by suspicion, and we have an AfD process, not just a secret handshake somewhere away from scrutiny. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I AfD'd them because they weren't notable. I found these articles in New Page Patrol, where I focus on transportation related articles. A scan of my contributions would make this quite obvious. I did not reference any sort of claims of socking (or anything to do with the article creator) in either of those AfDs, because I actually agree that doing so would be inappropriate. I was asked for my personal opinion and I gave it. What I did not do was advocate for targeting this article solely based on who wrote it. My arguments were based on notability. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect unless an editor can provide references to actual genuine independent reliable sources that devote significant coverage to this particular locomotive. Speculating about the existence of plenty of erudite texts is of no value to this discussion, and even if such hypothetical texts existed and covered the design of this class and the building records of this batch of locos, they would be of no value in establishing the notability of this specific locomotive as opposed to a class of locomotives. Cullen328 (talk) 17:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From Me to You (Crunchy Black album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per the first discussion, no evidence that this album is notable, and since the artist's page is just a redirect to the far more notable group he is a part of, this doesn't even serve a purpose as a redirect. No chart positions, no certifications, only one review that really goes in-depth about the album (the AllMusic writeup is more of an overview of the release, while the XXL piece is an interview so not independent), no evidence of notability to pass WP:NALBUMS. My attempt to have the page speedy deleted per WP:A9 (see the last discussion) was declined. JeffSpaceman (talk) 10:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mohabbat Reza Reza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I draftified this article because I felt it didn't meet the GNG. However, the creator EternalSun1 (talk · contribs) moved it back to the main NS to avoid an AFC review, leaving me no choice but to take it to AfD. I believe it fails to meet GNG. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 10:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Hum_TV#Romance: a standard ATD when coverage about production for verification exists and the series has a notable cast; not opposed to Keep for that matter, if other users judge it is sufficient. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Hum_TV#Romance: I don't think that this TV series is any special from all other series produced by Hum TV. Storyline/Cast is also not notable in my opinion. Only 6-7 episodes have been aired till now. Notability can be decided when the series finishes. Wikibear47 (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    there are many television shows that have similar storylines and aren't "special" from other series, which are still on Wikipedia. This isn't a fair reasoning for deletion since people who do like this series, and want to get information about it, won't have a space where they can check all of the details. Sabreen Hisbani is the notable actress in the show, she is one of Pakistan's biggest actresses working on shows like "Laa", "Parchayee", "Aunn Zara", "Mohabbat Tumse Nafrat Hai" which have all been very succesful. Either way, cast notability shouldn't matter if the show is coming from a large Pakistani network, with proper articles, details etc. If there are any details to be added, please contribute to the article. Add sources aswell. The show itself was announced less than a month ago (teasers, name, full cast was announced on October 7, 2024) so more articles should be rolling out soon. I have also added an IMDb for the show in external links and the official Hum TV website, which states alot of the details. Thank you for the contribution EternalSun1 (talk) 05:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I see a consensus to Delete this article now. Liz Read! Talk! 06:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All prior XfDs for this page:


List of people who use their middle names as their first names (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of people in all walks of life go by their some form of their middle name. This is not an uncommon or poorly understood phenomenon. The sources by and large may verify that the listed person uses their middle name, but that isn't the focus of the coverage, because it simply is not really unusual or noteworthy to do so. There's simply no depth to this, it feels more like random trivia than something one would find in an encyclopedia. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:15, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Symons, Mitchell (2007). "Famous People Who Use Their Middle Names As First Names". This, That And The Other. Transworld Publishers. p. 183. ISBN 978-0-552-15647-9. Archived from the original on June 22, 2024. Retrieved June 22, 2024.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 09:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as a list with no point, and no sustainable future. As the blurb at the beginning of the list points out, in some cultures it is absolutely normal for the middle name to be used, not the first, so this list would have to include everyone born into one of those cultures. Meanwhile a prodigious number of people choose to use their middle name, so the list is doomed to grow to unmanageable proportions. We already deal with this by listing notable people by the name to which they are referred in sources (which is generally the name they've chosen to use). In the rare cases where a reader might go looking for someone by the "wrong" name, we can have redirects. There is no navigational value in having a list of notable people (or celebrities) who use their middle name. There is no cultural or educational value in the table. And as a side issue, since the table currently includes a column "full name/birth name" we have the issue that if someone has changed gender, we run the risk of either implying their birth-name is something that it wasn't, or dead-naming them, which we've agreed not to do, so by policy this column must either be renamed or removed. And on top of that, the list in its current form is somehow stuck between being more than it should be for a navigational list, and unconvincingly referenced as a stand-alone list (in that although it has copious references for the actual names, it has nothing much to justify that using a middle name is an encyclopedic topic). Elemimele (talk) 11:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete First, the actual title should be people who go by their middle names. But second, as the length of the list shows, this is a meaninglessly common phenomenon, particularly among celebrities, who may have more reasons than the rest of us do to avoid going by their actual first names in public. Mangoe (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - indiscriminate information WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt (talk) 13:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It is very common and quite unremarkable for someone to go by their middle name. None of these people are connected to each other in any way; this is not of navigational use for a meaningful characteristic. In some cases they've gone by the legal middle name since a child, in other cases they changed their names when they got famous (a short skim of bio pages didn't have any that found it worth explaining). I just don't see the significance here. Middle name is welcome to have more discussion with contextual examples if there are sources that cover this concept, but such a lengthy list isn't needed. Reywas92Talk 13:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify: This list meets WP:LISTPEOPLE since it appears to be a list of notable people who use their middle names. I think the original name should be restored to reflect this. I also think the list should be categorised so that at a glance readers can see Heads of State who use their middle name, Actors who use their middle names, Sportspeople who use their middle names, and so on. DesiMoore (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, indiscriminate list. When I came across the title of this article while checking Isaidnoway's edit count stats (because I was curious about them after interacting with them at my admin recall request), I was shocked that it was still allowed here (even before discovering the AFD notice) and thought it was a holdover from Wikipedia's early days when we had lists of people by name ... I was very surprised that it was created in 2024. Indeed I've just discovered that in 2016 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable anglophones known by their middle names was closed as delete. There was also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people known by initials (which included "List of people known by middle name"), deleted in 2007. Graham87 (talk) 12:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as uselessly indiscriminate. As I said at a related DYK, this is an incredibly common naming tradition (I use it!) that holds no encyclopedic merit. JoelleJay (talk) 18:53, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: harmless but stupid and unnecessary. Technically meets WP:NLIST but what's the point of having this? What's next - Names of people whose names rhyme with crack? --A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 23:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Note: This article was already nominated for deletion once under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrities who use their middle names as their first names. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per my rationale in the previous deletion discussion. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
PARCO Coastal Refinery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another proposed dead project which never really took off. Three sources are from the same newspaper. I think it would have been noticeable if it was under construction or complete. Wikibear47 (talk) 08:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karak Oil Refinery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Construction never really started. Based on couple of news reports. Looks like a case of TOOSOON. Article is also GNG tagged. Wikibear47 (talk) 08:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bobo Ajudua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Closed as delete in AFD just June 2023, the article found its way back again. But nothing has changed. The current sources are 95 percent press statement or covertly sponsored articles announcing new business deals Ednabrenze (talk) 09:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already at AFD, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Sources still don't impress me, I'm not seeing much beyond business deals done and the like. I also don't find much more in RS since the last time we looked at this about a year ago. Not meeting notability requirements. Oaktree b (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kole Akintujoye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this person meets GNG. They claim to have received a global recognition award but that award doesn't appear to be notable either. Most of the sources seem to be blogs and interviews Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christiani Pitts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR with sparse credits, none major. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:25, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valley Flyer (bus company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is pertaining to a former trading name of Cityline New Zealand Ltd, a subsidiary of NZ Bus. An article for Cityline New Zealand Ltd also does not exist. A trading name for some non-notable subsidiary bus company which doesn't even has its own article fails WP:N. Additionally, this article only cites two sources which don't even appear to refer to the company as specifically "Valley Flyer" once, thereby also failing WP:RS. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete could be redirected but all the mentions on NZ Bus are not sourced/source does not mention it. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2024 Duki coal mine attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NEVENT. Should be merged into Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2024 like other similar incidents. Wikibear47 (talk) 07:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak merge. Not a lot here that can’t be contained in the list article easily. If it does prove notable through depth and length of coverage - which, there are some indications this might, it can always be re-split out. I oppose draftifying because there’s no problems solved there not solved by a merger. Pakistan specifically only very rarely has long term coverage of events that would receive retrospective coverage in many other countries. But this one seems quite severe so it could change. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
merge to the Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2024 article since that suggestion was sockstriked PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Change vote to redirect. Even if there's nothing to merge I find maintaining the link as a redirect makes it clearer to future readers that there was once a page there. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as 21 deaths is a not insignificant number, and its too soon to declare WP:NOTNEWS or WP:NEVENT Jebiguess (talk) 06:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Arguments are divided between Keep and Merge but Keeps are weak, just asserting the subject is notable without highlighting what sources help establish GNG. Claims have to be backed up by evidence.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: there were only 2 merge !votes prior to your relisting. It's seems like you are just going to re-list until the time the result seems favorable to your POV. Mister Banker (talk) 00:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mister Banker, I don't care what happens with this particular article, I was just assessing the discussion as I saw it at the time. But since you have raised objections, I will let other editors/admins handle this discussion in the future. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge: to the list of "Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2024"; this can always be broken out again into a new article if it turns out this is a substantially notable event. It doesn't seem to be at this point. Oaktree b (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Parkour Civilization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about an insignificant passing internet meme that, like many others, fails the general notability guidelines. Every source in use here is from a tabloid, borderline unreliable source (save for Rolling Stone) that talks about a brief internet trend rather the series itself. To go into specifics, Daily Dot and Dexerto are tabloids that should be used with caution and cannot demonstrate notability per WP:RSP, IMBD is user-generated content and is unreliable as a result per WP:IMBD, and Times Now is an undiscussed source, but due to WP:NEWSORGINDIA it doesn't look good. And even if these sources were reliable, they are mostly just showcasing social media posts and don't actually hold any critical commentary. The show also fails WP:SUSTAINED, since every source was published in a short time frame, and nothing new has been written about the subject since as found by my WP:BEFORE searches. λ NegativeMP1 20:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per well argued nom. There appears to be a dearth of WP:INDEPTH WP:RELIABLE sources on the topic of the article (and not a tangentially related meme [which also doesn't pass the bar of WP:N]). Only the Rolling Stone article meets all the criteria that are needed to contribute to WP:GNG, and we can't hang an article on one source. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 20:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Draft, as the page creator, I agree that it doesn't reach notability guidelines. Mainly due to WP:SUSTAINED like you mentioned. The page itself has brought myself a overload of anxiety due to the fact I thought for sure it was going to get deleted at some point. The Rolling Stone article is the only thing that actually gives anything insightful on the topic, but Wikipedia needs at least two reliable sources that meet the criteria to be considered notable. I am still new to Wikipedia, so I have no idea what the best outcome would be. The subject itself is only ~60% of the way to being considered notable, though, It could be possible it gains another notable source at some point in the future. (no idea if that'd be bringing it back to draft or just appealing it when the time comes)
Please do what you think is best for Wikipedia, but as for now I'd appreciate if it was sent back to draft space or deleted. ^-^ Kaixvny (talk) 22:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Technically speaking, there is no real "criteria" for what makes something notable or not. The notability guidelines only calls for "multiple" reliable sources. So depending on the depth of the sources at hand (multiple pages, academic coverage, etc.), that number could be as low as two, but many people writing about pop-culture topics sourced to news websites generally try and aim for three in-depth sources (though, again, this is not a requirement). But this doesn't really meet that anyways. With that being said, I'm sorry if worrying about if the article would survive or not stressed you out. It's just part of the learning process on Wikipedia that I have faced myself, as have many others. It takes a while to learn and get used to, but in the end it works out. λ NegativeMP1 22:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Right! I think i pulled the number two from HELP:AFD in "How to save the article.", I completely agree, and I'm glad this page is finally getting a outcome, it feels much more like breather than anything. As later on during its lifespan, I realized how much I stretched out the sources I had, and the fact it was a ticking time-bomb. Like I said, I still believe it it could eventually reach notability/better coverage in the future but not as of this moment, though could It possibly be shrunken down into a paragraph in List of Internet phenomenas? Honestly, it may still be too un-notable for that but I'm just thinking of other possible outcomes. Kaixvny (talk) 23:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was about nominate this article myself, but forgot about it. I agree with everything NegativeMP1 said. My search on DDG and Google showed up no other usable source besides a questionable source Dexerto. Ca talk to me! 06:25, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftification works too, although I feel like all the coverage are just flash in the pan. Ca talk to me! 14:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All I can say, if the only sources are the series itself and IMdB is allowed, then why isn't Battle for Dream Island?. All of these points have been brought up against the series, what's different about that? not to mention on youtube they are of very close subscriber count. Think about that before saying anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyllstru (talkcontribs) 01:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kaixvny, this isn't the place to discuss the inclusion of BFDI or any other article, but instead for Parkour Civilization, which should be done on Policies and Guidelines. I will note that nobody thus far (even the article's author) have advocated keep, so I don't know where you've got the idea that there is some hypocrisy (may I recommended reading WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS) Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 06:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong ping, I am the page creator, replier is @Kyllstru! ^_^ Kaixvny (talk) 09:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies. It's my fault for my over-reliance on the WP:REPLYTOOL's pinging tool, without properly checking Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 11:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/parkour-civilization-minecraft-movie-cinema-1235124169/ Yes Yes Per WP:ROLLINGSTONE. Yes There is significant coverage about the video itself, and not just talking about it being viral. Yes
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-buzz/viral-minecraft-film-parkour-civilization-gets-removed-from-letterboxd-fans-outraged-article-113949603 Yes Even though WP:NEWSORGINDIA urges editors to exercise caution, I don't see any reason to believe this is sponsored. Look at the tone and language of the article, its placement in the publication, use of generic bylines not identifying an individual reporter or reviewer, overlap in language with articles found in other publications and on other websites, and others. These issues do not apply to this article. Yes WP:NEWSORG per Times Now - no reason to believe a reputable news organization would be unreliable when it comes to reporting on a mostly Western cultural phenomenon. Yes Despite intermingled with quotes from Twitter, analysis of the plot and its significance is plain significant coverage: hustling culture, societal injustice, and income disparity. Yes
https://www.dailydot.com/memes/parkour-civilization-meme/ Yes ~ I've gone and read the closing comments at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 390#RFC (The Daily Dot). The main arguments against The Daily Dot's reliability has been on clickbait, [fusing] opinion with factual reporting, its political coverage, which do not apply much to this article, and there is the source is probably reliable for mundane reporting on internet culture. On reading the article I do not find too much bias in the reporting, so this is probably reliable. ~ Hard to salvage, but the sentences from the tale of an oppressed individual and The dramatic tone should be addressing the video directly and in detail as required in WP:SIGCOV. ~ Partial
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
Overall I believe these sources are enough in establishing notability per WP:GNG, and verifiable enough we can write an article on it. WP:NSUSTAINED appears to primarily talk about people and events, and for articles in other topics in general, no explicit words are given that sustained coverage is a requirement, but consideration should still be applied per context. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 07:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sources provide very surface-level commentary on the show. The only third-party fact in the article (that is, not view count, voice actors, release medium, etc) is the fact that it inspired the meme "NO ONE chooses to jump for the beef". Any further coverage seems unlikely since the meme has already in its deathbed, unlike Skibidi Toilet or TADC. Ca talk to me! 12:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC) edited for typo 11:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which article were you referring to? 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 12:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was referring to the Wikipedia article. The fact that there is a dearth of third-party content in the article creates WP:NPOV concerns, leading to WP:PAGEDECIDE considerations: Sometimes, when a subject is notable, but it is unlikely that there ever will be a lot to write about it, editors should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of creating a permanent stub. Ca talk to me! 11:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see. The article as it currently stands is not a permanent stub and works fine as a standalone article to me. I'm not sure what you mean by third-party content though. The article is about the video series so it would make sense to talk about the video series? It is unclear to me where the NPOV issues are. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 11:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I second Ca's comments. This isn't enough and what there is is basically flash-in-the-plan. And I would definitely say SUSTAINED should be taken into account regardless of it being a "requirement" or not. λ NegativeMP1 03:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't told me which sources fail significant coverage and why. The articles I have listed do, in my opinion, [address] the topic directly and in detail. I'm not sure what you mean by taking SUSTAINED into account. I've read sustained multiple times and I am unsure how that can be applied to a deletion discussion. If this passes GNG, then it is presumed notable. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 04:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Except that it doesn't pass GNG. You're basically working with one and a half sources, and I'm personally referring to the Times Now article (not sure what Ca is referring to). What is there is very surface level, and it's still mostly just rehashing social media comments. It's the type of source that would be thrown out in most deletion discussions. And the Daily Dot should be disqualified to establish notability due to its faultiness as a source. If another source or two came out then it'd be fine, but right now it's too soon. And applying SUSTAINED to a deletion discussion is very simple: maybe it's a bad sign for whether or not something is actually notable if all of the coverage that exists for a subject was published in the span of a few days, and then never again. λ NegativeMP1 16:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've explained why Daily Dot should not be completely disqualified, and I'd like to hear more reasoning than just affirming its faultiness as a source.
As for Times Now, I'm really not sure what you mean by surface level when the third and fourth paragraph addresses the film directly and in detail. I do agree that the way it is written sounds AI-y and I am less enthusiastic about that.
On the whole, I still believe this passes GNG, even if just on the border line. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 17:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If a source is marked by WP:RSP as there being absolutely no consensus regarding its reliability in general, then I do not think it should be used to establish notability in a case like this and even your own source assessment table marks it as "partial". And if a source sounds machine-generated, why are you arguing for its usage? And both paragraphs you highlight are literally just plot summary as well as a few dashes of what fans think of the series. There is no actual critical commentary from what the article author themselves thinks beyond "this exists".
And to solidify this further, this article was written by an author who has worked with Sportskeeda, which is an unreliable content farm and this article honestly reminds me of something that would come from Sportskeeda based on how its written (which, as you've said, could very well have been done by AI). So again, I will repeat, this weirdly-worded social media post rehashing page does not contribute to the subjects notability. Take into account the actual contents of these sources. λ NegativeMP1 18:37, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No consensus does not mean consensus against. It just means that additional considerations apply. And in this case I don't think the additional considerations pose too much concern on how it can be used to establish notability.
That said, even though I believe this passes GNG, I'm not opposed to a closure with WP:TOOSOON. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 05:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 08:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs based on a film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same issues as with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs that retell a work of literature, but that one at least has references - here we have nothing. Just OR trivia, with most songs here not even seemingly notable (not blue linked). Fails WP:NLIST and WP:V. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EFx Factory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article. A redirect was just reversed. A WP:BEFORE search turned up little to nothing. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 07:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)LibStar (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Crowne Plaza Foshan Hotel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Searching for its name in English no significant third party coverage. I google translated the first few google news hits for its Chinese name and they don't appear to be in-depth. Would reconsider if someone did more thorough Chinese searches. LibStar (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features)#Artificial features, which says:

    Buildings, including private residences, transportation facilities and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability.

    Sources

    1. Zou, Yimin 邹益民; Zhou, Yaqing 周亚庆 (2006). 饭店战略管理 [Hotel Strategic Management] (in Chinese). Beijing: Tourism Education Press. ISBN 978-7-5637-1339-4. Retrieved 2024-10-26 – via Google Books.

      The book notes: "佛山宾馆作为佛山的首家五星级饭店,自1981年成立以来,从一家 70多间客房的小型饭店,发展成400多间客房,年营业额超1.5亿元,并 具有一定国内知名度的五星级国际商务型旅游饭店。佛山宾馆国有股权 公开推介转让,要求受让方必须是世界饭店业的前30强,引来了国内外 数十家投资企业。 至2004年12月31日,佛山宾馆65%的国有股权最终转让给国际知名 的洲际饭店集团及其战略合作伙伴佛山奥园投资有限公司,出让总价超 4亿元(含承接债务),比原评估价溢价2.3%,而剩余的35%国有股权则 转让给佛山宾馆的经营团队及骨干员工。洲际饭店集团入主经营后,佛山宾馆将更名为“佛山皇冠假日饭店”。"

      From Google Translate: "As the first five-star hotel in Foshan, Foshan Hotel has grown from a small hotel with more than 70 rooms to a five-star international business tourist hotel with more than 400 rooms, an annual turnover of more than 150 million yuan, and a certain domestic reputation since its establishment in 1981. The state-owned equity of Foshan Hotel was publicly promoted for transfer, requiring the transferee to be among the top 30 in the world's hotel industry, attracting dozens of domestic and foreign investment companies. As of December 31, 2004, 65% of the state-owned equity of Foshan Hotel was finally transferred to the internationally renowned InterContinental Hotels Group and its strategic partner Foshan Aoyuan Investment Co., Ltd., with a total transfer price of more than 400 million yuan (including debt assumption), a premium of 2.3% over the original appraisal price, and the remaining 35% of the state-owned equity was transferred to the management team and key employees of Foshan Hotel. After InterContinental Hotels Group took over the management, Foshan Hotel will be renamed "Foshan Crowne Plaza Hotel"."

    2. "佛山宾馆晋「五星级」" [Foshan Hotel becomes "five-star"]. Wenhui Bao (in Chinese). 2004-02-22.

      The article notes: "佛山宾馆正式荣膺为佛山市首家「五星级旅游饭店」。21日下午,由国家旅游局总局颁发的「五星级旅游饭店」牌匾正式挂上佛山宾馆的正门。佛山宾馆的前身是政府招待所,始建于1981年,1989年名列国家旅游局首批授予的「三星级旅游涉外饭店」;1996年成为佛山市区首家「四星级旅游涉外饭店」,如今迈入「五星级旅游饭店」行列。"

      From Google Translate: "Foshan Hotel was officially awarded as the first "Five-Star Tourist Hotel" in Foshan City. On the afternoon of the 21st, the "Five-Star Tourist Hotel" plaque issued by the National Tourism Administration was officially hung on the main entrance of Foshan Hotel. Foshan Hotel was formerly a government guesthouse. It was built in 1981 and was listed in the first batch of "Three-Star Tourist Foreign-Related Hotels" awarded by the National Tourism Administration in 1989. In 1996, it became the first "Four-Star Tourist Foreign-Related Hotel" in Foshan City. Now it has entered the ranks of "Five-Star Tourist Hotels"."

      The rest of the article talks about a recent renovation and technology improvements the hotel made with Internet access and uninterruptible power supplies.

    3. Luo, Zhi-wei 罗志伟 (2003-12-12). "佛山宾馆做足功课迎宾客 确保《佛山千人宴》顺利进行" [Foshan Hotel has done its homework to welcome guests and ensure the smooth progress of "Foshan Banquet for Thousands of People"]. Wenhui Bao (in Chinese).

      The article notes: "记者走进电梯间,一眼就看到了中国工艺美术大师梅文鼎的原作「年年有余」;而在中庭展示区的左边,分别摆放着同样是中国工艺美术大师的庄稼、廖洪标的两件作品。此外,中国陶艺大师刘炳和刘泽棉的作品「陆羽品茶」和「布袋罗汉」还高雅地摆挂在中庭的右边。据透露,为了让来访和入住的宾客们欣赏和感染到具有佛山本地特色的传统工艺佳作,渲染宾馆上五星所需的艺术氛围和典雅,宾馆近期采购了这些作品回来。"

      From Google Translate: "The reporter walked into the elevator and saw the original work "Year after Year" by Chinese arts and crafts master Mei Wending at a glance; and on the left side of the atrium display area, there were two works by Zhuang Jiao and Liao Hongbiao, who are also Chinese arts and crafts masters. In addition, the works "Lu Yu Tasting Tea" and "Budai Luohan" by Chinese ceramic masters Liu Bing and Liu Zemian are also elegantly hung on the right side of the atrium. It is revealed that in order to let the visiting and staying guests appreciate and be infected by the traditional craft masterpieces with Foshan local characteristics, and to render the artistic atmosphere and elegance required for the hotel to be rated five stars, the hotel recently purchased these works."

    4. Hu, Feng 胡丰 (2005-01-01). "佛山宾馆转让国有股权" [Foshan Hotel transfers state-owned equity]. Nanfang Daily (in Chinese).

      The article notes: "本报讯昨日,佛山市国资委授权佛山市公盈投资控股有限公司引入国际知名企业洲际酒店集团,并就转让佛山宾馆65%的国有股权签署了协议。至此,佛山已把华侨大厦、金城大酒店及禅城酒店国有产权(资产)全部转让给新的投资者。"

      From Google Translate: "This newspaper reported that yesterday, Foshan State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission authorized Foshan Gongying Investment Holding Co., Ltd. to introduce the internationally renowned company InterContinental Hotels Group and signed an agreement to transfer 65% of the state-owned equity of Foshan Hotel. So far, Foshan has transferred all the state-owned property rights (assets) of Overseas Chinese Building, Jincheng Hotel and Chancheng Hotel to new investors."

    5. "卫生监督员入厨监管洗菜 佛山宾馆将为各国部长度身定做个性化菜式" [Health supervisors enter the kitchen to supervise the washing of vegetables. Foshan Hotel will tailor-make personalised dishes for ministers from various countries.]. Southern Metropolis Daily (in Chinese). 2005-11-01.

      The article notes: "本报讯前来参加论坛的亚洲各国文化部长将全部入住佛山市唯一一家五星级酒店佛山宾馆。该次接待为佛山宾馆有史以来规模和影响最大的一次,宾馆上下严阵以待,从饮食到保安层层把关,亚艺期间不接待其他宾客。"

      From Google Translate: "This newspaper reports that the ministers of culture from various Asian countries who come to attend the forum will all stay at Foshan Hotel, the only five-star hotel in Foshan. This reception is the largest in scale and influence in the history of Foshan Hotel. The hotel is on high alert, with strict checks from food to security. No other guests will be received during the Asian Art Festival."

      The article notes: "据悉,佛山宾馆第13、14楼全部重新装修,改建为一房一厅的套房23间。部长论坛期间,佛山宾馆将全部闭馆,除了少数长住熟客外,概不接待其他客人。"

      From Google Translate: "It is reported that the 13th and 14th floors of Foshan Hotel have been completely renovated and converted into 23 one-bedroom and one-living room suites. During the Ministerial Forum, Foshan Hotel will be completely closed and will not receive other guests except for a few long-term regular customers."

    6. Huang, Jing 黄静实; Tang, Qi 汤䔖 (2004-09-23). "佛山拟转让四大国有酒店 包括今年新晋五星的佛山宾馆,将协议转让控股权,不进行公开拍卖" [Foshan plans to transfer four state-owned hotels, including the newly upgraded five-star Foshan Hotel this year. The controlling stake will be transferred by agreement and no public auction will be held.]. Southern Metropolis Daily (in Chinese).

      The article notes: "本报讯(记者黄静实习生汤䔖)记者昨日从佛山市国资委获悉,经佛山市政府批准,佛山拟转让四大星级酒店的国有股权(资产),它们分别是:佛山宾馆(五星)、金城大酒店(四星)、华侨大厦(四星)、禅城酒店(三星)。"

      From Google Translate: "This reporter (reporter Huang Jing, intern Tang Qi) learned from Foshan State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission yesterday that Foshan plans to transfer the state-owned equity (assets) of four star-rated hotels with the approval of Foshan Municipal Government. They are: Foshan Hotel (five-star), Jincheng Hotel (four-star), Overseas Chinese Building (four-star), Chancheng Hotel (three-star)."

    7. Tang, Keqin 汤克琴; Zhang, Qianjing 张倩菁 (2008-12-11). "佛宾挂牌"皇冠假日"业主未变 洲际酒店集团只输出管理,楼外建筑仍保留"佛山宾馆"标识" [Foshan Hotel is renamed as "Crown Holiday Hotel" but the owner remains unchanged. InterContinental Hotels Group only exports management, and the building outside the building still retains the "Foshan Hotel" logo]. Southern Metropolis Daily (in Chinese).

      The article notes: "去年底更名为“佛山皇冠假日酒店”的佛山宾馆经过一年筹备,昨日正式挂上此名。而“佛山宾馆”的字样将继续保留,管理方洲际酒店集团只是输出管理,不持有股权。已有27年历史的佛山宾馆为佛山首家五星级大酒店,2004年底转制,在国有股权转让的过程中,佛山市奥园置业投资有限公司、佛山市佛宾酒店管理有限公司分别受让佛山宾馆65%和35%的国有股权。... 2007年12月22日,洲际酒店集团进驻佛山宾馆,佛宾成为中国第79家由该集团管理的酒店。"

      From Google Translate: "Foshan Hotel, which was renamed "Foshan Crown Holiday Hotel" at the end of last year, was officially named yesterday after a year of preparation. The words "Foshan Hotel" will continue to be retained, and the management party InterContinental Hotels Group only exports management and does not hold equity. The 27-year-old Foshan Hotel is the first five-star hotel in Foshan. It was restructured at the end of 2004. During the transfer of state-owned equity, Foshan Aoyuan Real Estate Investment Co., Ltd. and Foshan Foshan Hotel Management Co., Ltd. respectively acquired 65% and 35% of the state-owned equity of Foshan Hotel. ... On 22 December 2007, InterContinental Hotels Group entered Foshan Hotel, and Fobin became the 79th hotel managed by the group in China."

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Crowne Plaza Foshan Hotel (Chinese: 佛山皇冠假日酒店), previously known as Foshan Hotel (simplified Chinese: 佛山宾馆; traditional Chinese: 佛山賓館), to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 09:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 11:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coresystems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A decade after the last AfD and the company doesn't seem any more notable under WP:NCORP than it did then. Brandon (talk) 06:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Previously at AFD so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: An article about a company, originally created by an account blocked as a sockpuppet. The 2015 AfD attracted minimal attention. Since then, the company has been split. Taking this article's topic to be the "SAP add-ons, consulting and reselling" residue, searches find this publicity piece regarding their InsightLoop pivot to AI (using the same words added to the article by an IP), but I am not seeing the coverage needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 06:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
120 Bahadur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film is scheduled to be released a year from now and just started filming. Majority of sources are announcements or press releases. CNMall41 (talk) 02:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep my vote is for keep, kindly understand that there are many Hollywood and Bollywood movies that are upcoming in 2025 some are more than a year away yet many already have established wiki pages on them such The Accountant 2, F1, Now You See Me 3, Jurassic World Rebirth, Jolly LLB 3, and more the list is endless. The information current available on the film 120 Bahadur is good enough to create a wiki page and as time progress and more info is available the wiki page will definitely grow with time. Moreover it is a film about a historically significant event. So the wiki page deserve a place with other films that are up for release in 2025. Bonadart (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your argument seems to fall under WP:OSE which is not something that can be used to support notability. Can you point out which references are specifically significant coverage that would count towards notability? The ones I see do not but will look at any you provide in case there is something I missed. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i am in no mood to argue, my contention is if The Accountant 2, Now You See Me 3, Jurassic World Rebirth, Jolly LLB 3 which are pure fiction can have well established wiki page, then 120 Bahadur which is based on real life and a immensely historical and significant event if you may think of, also deserves a place, and if you want to talk of capturing space in that case i think this page doesnt even grab a space more than tip of safety pin out of whole wiki sphere. Bonadart (talk) 04:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"I am in no mood to argue" - This is a discussion, not an argument. It does sound like maybe you should back away if you are not in the mindspace to discuss. I will reiterate that everything you stated, including in the reply above, would fall under WP:OSE.--CNMall41 (talk) 04:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the history it previously was. Creator objected to the draft and moved it back to mainspace. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see from page history that the page was moved to draft but it was moved back to mainspace but I am giving benefit of doubt that Bonadart will accept the consensus by the closer, if it ends with draftify and not move it back to mainspace till the film gets significant coverage likely after post-production. RangersRus (talk) 23:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I think it is futile to Draftify this article if the content creator is going to immediately move it back to main space so I'd like to see some assurances from them about this. A Redirect was also mentioned but it's not clear what the target article would be.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for keeping the discussion alive
my 3 points
1. with all due respect ' if the content creator is going to immediately move it back to main space ' is bit harsh, please understand it takes time and effort to create a page, lot more to develop it. i have no issue if a article is deleted or kept in draft but it should always be done after thorough discussion, once consensus is reached why will any one have any problem, certainly not me.
2. regarding this page as I said earlier, agreed that this film is about a year away but so are movies like The Accountant 2, Now You See Me 3, Jurassic World Rebirth, Jolly LLB 3 but all these films have well established pages already, my point is these films are based on fiction where as this film '120 Bahadur' is based on reality and facts, so it deserves a space.
3. as for sources anyone include better sources if anyone can find.
thanks
Bonadart (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I still do not see any consensus but I'm not ready to close this as No Consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think there would be complaints for a "requirement" that an editor make use of AFC unless a) there are COI issues or b) the draft is of an article that was deleted through an AFD. There are a lot of experienced editors who view AFC as completely optional. Liz Read! Talk! 06:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taoguang Yanghui (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be moved to draft as it still needs much work. At present, it is a rough translation and remains very essay-like. Amigao (talk) 01:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep for now, without prejudice to a WP:DRAFTREASON #2 draftify. I really can't see any difference between this and a machine translated version of the jpwiki page, so there is a valid, policy based reason to draftify (WP:ATD-I). I'm not convinced draftification would be the best option right now though. I would like the option to draftify to remain open if there are no improvements in, say, 2 months, though, because it really does need a significant rewrite. (Or maybe stubify to two or three paragraphs, but we can make the decision then not now) Alpha3031 (tc) 13:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Using AI to Protect NC Healthcare Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An essay, presumably written by a college class. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG by failing test of WP:NOT. Honestly there should be a CSD category for "ill-conceived class assignment." Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dclemens1971 Or, perhaps more seriously, "blatant essay," which this would fall under.
AtSymbolEveryone: Rest assured, the university and WikiEdu staff surrounding this article have been notified about this AfD. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On New Page Review, I have seen a reasonable number of essays masquerading as articles produced for a class assignment. They've often gone unreviewed long enough that they can be PRODded without objection. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dclemens1971 I don't use PROD for new page patrol, seeing how I've never been able to use it in that context without the creator objecting. It's a good thing, I suppose, that you found a loophole to that. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 05:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Seems like WP:FORUM. Takipoint123 (talk) 03:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Obvious delete but this is a common issue with these college classes and I strongly believe that enrolled students should not be able to move assignments into mainspace without going through WP:AFC. Esolo5002 (talk) 03:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Esolo5002 Unfortunately, AfC might take too long for a college course. I suspect we don't notice most college courses that go through WikiEdu (such as this one) because they do a substantially better job...or, at least, whatever it is they do doesn't require an entire article to be deleted.
    Of course, perhaps there should better controls of how college-related userspace drafts get moved into mainspace, nevertheless. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Going by their talk page, I feel like they might have "forgot" to complete the training modules (or just rushed through them without reading the instructions), since even the usual essay-like stuff we get from WikiEdu are much better (at least, good enough that I'd just tag and release instead of needing high explosives). I don't think actually getting reviewed and mainspaced should necessarily be a requirement for their assignment to be marked (if it is then they should remove it) but I'm not sure these ones would actually read the instructions to keep them in draft.
    I understand from the talk page that the WikiEdu team does their own post-publication review process and moves things back to draft when necessary, I think a good first step would be to make that process a pre-publication process as much as possible, and ideally with some form of on-wiki note of the feedback received (this doesn't have to be the full feedback if there's anything they'd like to keep private, but some indication of what they went through would be nice). Carving out WikiEdu submissions from WP:DRAFTNO to allow individual reviewer discretion in enforcing draft/userification even when contested would probably cover the rest. Alpha3031 (tc) 07:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Alpha3031 Unfortunately, I can anticipate a negative impact on our relationships with universities if there were a few too many drafts being moved back into draftspace over a professors/students objections. But, as you said, this student probably didn't complete the training as intended, so my objection is mainly to that is that the benefit is smaller than the (already small) risk.
    I'm not sure why there's such an expectation to move things to mainspace, to be frank. I just know when there's a "move to mainspace" step, we have problems with a small minority of students. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 07:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tim Myers (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 03:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Alexeyevitch(talk) 07:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎ per WP:G3. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 16:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Avar-Kabardian campaign (1618) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a (possible, but not assured) WP:HOAX. Most sources are offline and, those that aren't, are broken links. At least two of the sources don't appear to exist at all (or at least in any database like Worldcat, etc.). I approved this via WP:AFC based on a background check that accidentally conflated this campaign with what, on further investigation, was an entirely different event.

The new editor who submitted this also submitted another article related to a battle which I just rejected at AFC, after being unable to confirm that some of the sources even existed, let alone supported the content. Note my comments there [48]. Chetsford (talk) 02:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Many of the sources do not appear to exist (e.g. I can find no evidence of a Yuri A. Popov affiliated with North-Caucasus Federal University and the link is to ncuf.edu, which is the wrong domain; it should be ncfu.ru. Similarly there is no caucasusherald.com or historicalecho.com or caucasianstudies.org.) If this isn't a hoax, the references are so badly constructed that I am unable to find the sources cited, and in many cases even the authors and publishers of those sources, and Google Scholar turns up no results for "Avar-Kabardian 1618". Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Except a link to this article I cannot find anything on Google, Scholar, etc. about this alleged event and I cannot verify even a single of the sources provided. Killarnee (talk) 13:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. While Journal of Caucasian Studies does exist, no such paper that was referenced in the article was published that year. I suspect it to be reference fabrication. OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Ri Myong-jun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 01:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that information about these North Korean players is almost impossible, here at least we have something. I'm going to withdraw my vote, I don't know if it's enough for WP:SIGCOV, but let's expand the discussion. Svartner (talk) 00:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Julie Breathnach-Banwait (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe she meets WP:AUTHOR or WP:BIO more broadly. 1 hit in google news and nothing in google books which is surprising for a writer. LibStar (talk) 01:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relative Success with Tabatha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Most of the sources provided are www.showbuzzdaily.com . The other sources not reliable being instagram and tvguide.com LibStar (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]