The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The majority of editors in this discussion favoured keeping this article, however, they lacked a compelling rationale, relying mostly on WP:ITSNOTABLE. There are cases in which our usual standards for the inclusion of topics in the encyclopaedia – significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources – are ignored in the face of an overriding reason, but there is no motivation to make an exception in this instance. Skomorokh, barbarian 02:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]