The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The arguments against keeping weren't properly addressed/corrected and as a result it seems that the community consensus (excluding the blatant sockpuppets) feels that the article does not meet our inclusion guidelines (especially those regarding notability and sourcing). Rjd0060 (talk) 14:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]