Wikipedia:Deletion review/Ginger Jolie

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Having read and evaluated this discussion and carefully considered the AfD close, I find that there is a rough consensus to endorse Wizardman's closure. Consensus exists that in this particular case deletion is a reasonable outcome based on weighing the relevant factors of relative notability, BLP, and subjects wishes. In another case the balance of these factors might be different and admins are advised to be cautious befre citing this closure as precedent. While the proper disposition of this article is reasonably clear there is not consensus for a blanket rule that in the case of BLP's no consensus defaults to delete, or, for that matter, the reverse. Instead, the (lack of) notability of this particular person is considered such that deleting is endorsed in light of a request. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]