Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Addition log/2024

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Kanye West studio albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. Vultures 2

edit | discuss

Kanye West studio albums

15 articles

The College Dropout

Late Registration ^(subtopic)

Graduation

808s & Heartbreak ^(subtopic)

My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy

Watch the Throne

Yeezus

The Life of Pablo

Ye ^(subtopic)

Kids See Ghosts ^(subtopic)

Jesus Is King ^(subtopic)

Donda

Vultures 1

Vultures 2

Literally only two months after the release of Vultures 2, I have now brought it to GA status and well outpaced the retention period for this GAN! The album is a worthy addition as the second collaborative effort between Kanye West and Ty Dolla Sign, or should I say ¥$, and it was more stable than Vultures 1 so that helped become a GA sooner and let's see if it can become an addition now. --K. Peake 08:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support as a straightforward addition of the latest album. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Idiosincrático (talk) 05:44, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. dotXK 13:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – NØ 19:22, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/1989 (album) for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. I Wish You Would
2. All You Had to Do Was Stay
3. I Know Places
4. How You Get the Girl

view | edit | discuss

1989

18 articles

"Welcome to New York"

"Blank Space"

"Style"

"Out of the Woods"

"All You Had to Do Was Stay"

"Shake It Off"

"I Wish You Would"

"Bad Blood"

"Wildest Dreams"

"How You Get the Girl"

"This Love"

"I Know Places"

"Clean"

"You Are in Love"

"New Romantics"

The 1989 World Tour

1989 (Taylor's Version) ^(subtopic)

i created the article for i wish you would, and promoted it to ga status. fortunately, it still has the required amount of featured articles for this ft to remain as a featured topic. yay brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 02:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I am curious which recent event made "I Wish You Would" suddenly notable, and why the same notability would not extend to songs like "How You Get the Girl" (whose Taylor's version charted two spots lower in Canada and nine in the US) and "I Know Places" (three spots lower in Canada and five in the US). It would be preferable not to delay those, if they are notable already, just because there aren't enough FAs for the topic to remain featured.--NØ 09:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hold for All You Had to Do Was Stay, which was GA-nominated just five days after the nomination. I would personally like to see the other two tracks on the standard edition join the topic together in the next addition. This really does not need to go through four different addition processes.--NØ 14:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Wait – per above. Idiosincrático (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now that both All You Had to Do Was Stay and I Wish You Would can be added, the topic can remain featured. @Brachy0008: is there any movement on the creation of "I Know Places" and/or "How You Get the Girl"? Is there a reason why these articles don't exist, are the songs not notable enough, or have the articles simply not been made? Idiosincrático (talk) 01:32, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    we haven't dug up sources for i know places and how you get the girl yet. furthermore, if they are made, there would be a bit more issues keeping this a featured topic. the plan is to get bad blood to FA, then create articles for both i know places and how you get the girl, so yes, those articles are being held back a bit. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 02:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    update: i created the draft for i know places. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 23:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Whether or not "How You Get the Girl" or "I Know Places" should have their standalone articles depends on notability. So far I think "I Know Places" may have its standalone article, not sure about "How You Get the Girl". Ippantekina (talk) 04:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – although I don't really like the thought of holding the creation of new articles for the sake of a topic's status, I see that there is little motivation in creating these articles at the moment. As a result I support the nomination per the current collection of Wiki's articles, as I guess you can't oppose based on articles people can't or are unwilling to make (again it could be that these songs aren't notable enough to even have articles). I think in future, if there are more articles to make for a potential topic, a GTC discussion should probably be delayed until the new articles are created. Idiosincrático (talk) 14:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - albeit we have to agree not every track is worth an article, specially those that need some extensive research to just get enough material to write about. Not that this subtracts from your dedication. igordebraga ≠ 02:28, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: Seems all inclusive, and the supplemental nom makes sense. Don't really see a need for this to wait much longer. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: seems clear that these articles belong in this topic. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• update: both how you get the girl and i know places are now on wikipedia. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 12:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support I adjusted the template per the 2 additions. Now we are faced with how to convert this FT to a GT now that the featured content is under 50% Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  bad blood is nommed for fa so best wait until it gets promoted brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 04:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Update: Bad Blood (Taylor Swift song) has been promoted to FA. Ippantekina (talk) 02:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  YES! LET’S GO! brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 03:19, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing with a consensus to supplement.--NØ 17:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/1989 (Taylor's Version) for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. Suburban Legends (song)

edit | discuss

1989 (Taylor's Version)

6 articles

"'Slut!'"

"Say Don't Go"

"Now That We Don't Talk"

"Suburban Legends"

"Is It Over Now?"

The article, Suburban Legends (song), has been listed as GA. Gained (talk) 05:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – good to see all five vault articles at GA. Idiosincrático (talk) 01:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: Seems like a pretty straight forward addition. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – Aza24 (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Kanye West studio albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. Vultures 1

edit | discuss

Kanye West studio albums

15 articles

The College Dropout

Late Registration ^(subtopic)

Graduation

808s & Heartbreak ^(subtopic)

My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy

Watch the Throne

Yeezus

The Life of Pablo

Ye ^(subtopic)

Kids See Ghosts ^(subtopic)

Jesus Is King ^(subtopic)

Donda

Donda 2

Vultures 1

I have now brought West's latest collaborative effort Vultures 1 with Ty Dolla Sign to GA status just under half a year after its release, although the nomination had been initiated well within the retention period! Having gone number one in multiple countries, the album is a worthy addition to the topic (shout out ULPS for working with me on the article) however I would like to check in retrospect with comments below is there a consensus if Donda 2 should still be included after West revealed it was a demo album? --K. Peake 09:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support for the inclusion of Vultures 1. Regarding your other point: I would vote for the removal of Donda 2 from this topic, as a demo album is not really equivalent (at least, in my mind) to a studio-recorded release. joeyquism (talk) 13:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support addition of Vultures 1. I am really unsure about the Donda 2 article. It still constitutes new original music by Kanye West. But in the article, although uncited, it says it was retroactively downgraded as a demo album. Maybe it could be included with a note like: Donda 2 (demo). I will remain neutral on the issue. Idiosincrático (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - the new addition as an uncontroversial supplementary nomination. On the question of Donda 2, it should be removed from the topic unless we want the scope to be opened to all future demo albums from West, which I believe is not the intention.--NØ 08:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as a straightforward addition of the latest album. Also support the removal of Donda 2 as it's not a studio album, but a demo album. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support the addition of Vultures 1. I'm also unsure about the Donda 2 article either, per above. — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 13:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as a straight forward addition. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – Aza24 (talk) 03:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Looks like there is consensus to remove Donda 2, as well. Aza24 (talk) 04:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Jesus Is King for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. "God Is"

edit | discuss

Jesus Is King

12 articles

"Selah"

"Follow God"

"Closed on Sunday"

"On God"

"Everything We Need"

"Water"

"God Is"

"Hands On"

"Use This Gospel"

"Jesus Is Lord"

Jesus Is King (film)

Contributor(s): K. Peake, Nice4What

After doing more research around four and a half years following the release of Jesus Is King, I managed to find enough sourcing to make an article for "God Is" and have brought it to GA status already to be added to the album's topic now the song is no longer a mere redirect! --K. Peake 08:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support igordebraga ≠ 13:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Idiosincrático (talk) 14:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - IanTEB (talk) 22:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Kyle Peake, per the FT criteria, shouldn't there be a template that links these all together. Something like {{Jesus Is King}} and a similar cat like Category:Jesus is King? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  They're linked together on the Kanye West songs template. I've noticed that some other albums don't really have this kind of grouped linking on some template or category. Although the criteria says preferably in a template or category, it is usually clear that they're all the songs from the album. For example The Immaculate Collection compilation album topic doesn't have a template or category that groups these songs together. Idiosincrático (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Support, sorry, somehow I missed that one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: Straight forward addition. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – Aza24 (talk) 18:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Taylor Swift original studio albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. The Tortured Poets Department

view | edit | discuss

Taylor Swift original studio albums

12 articles

Taylor Swift ^(subtopic)

Fearless

Speak Now

Red

1989 ^(subtopic)

Reputation

Lover

Folklore

Evermore

Midnights ^(subtopic)

The Tortured Poets Department

The newly-added article, The Tortured Poets Department, has been promoted to GA. Ippantekina (talk) 04:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Idiosincrático (talk) 06:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - no issues here. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 18:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support kinda ironic from a Kanye West stan, but I can't help commending this work from you! --K. Peake 09:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support nice to see it already promoted. igordebraga ≠ 15:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Promotion of TTPD to GA occurred while a content discussion was still ongoing, meaning the article was not stable enough to qualify under GA criteria 4. While this RSN discussion looks to have resolved the matter, I have concerns regarding the GA promotion occurring in the midst of multiple reversions. I'm an involved party, but now that the content issue has been resolved, I would !vote support. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – glad that TTPD finally reached GA status. – The Sharpest Lives (💬•✏️•ℹ️) 21:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as a straightforward addition of the latest entry. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as a straightforward addition. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Closed with consensus to add the article in question – Aza24 (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/1989 (album) for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. You Are in Love

view | edit | discuss

1989

14 articles

"Welcome to New York"

"Blank Space"

"Style"

"Out of the Woods"

"Shake It Off"

"Bad Blood"

"Wildest Dreams"

"This Love"

"Clean"

"You Are in Love"

"New Romantics"

The 1989 World Tour

1989 (Taylor's Version) ^(subtopic)

The article "You Are in Love" was created by Brachy0008 and promoted to GA. Fortunately, the ratio of Featured articles to Overall articles still satisfies the criteria for an FT! Ippantekina (talk) 04:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support igordebraga ≠ 19:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as a straightforward addition. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – per sup nom. Idiosincrático (talk) 03:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: As a straightforward addition. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Straightforward addition. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 14:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Closed with a consensus to approve addition – Aza24 (talk) 02:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final Fantasy is a media franchise created by Hironobu Sakaguchi and owned by Square Enix that includes video games, motion pictures, and other merchandise. The series began in 1987 as an eponymous role-playing video game developed by Square, spawning a video game series that became the central focus of the franchise. The music of the Final Fantasy series refers to the soundtracks of the Final Fantasy series of video games, as well as the surrounding medley of soundtrack, arranged, and compilation albums. The franchise includes a main series of numbered games as well as several spin-off series such as Crystal Chronicles and the Final Fantasy Tactics series.

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Music of the Final Fantasy series for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. Music of Final Fantasy XVI

edit | discuss

Music of the Final Fantasy series

23 articles

Final Fantasy I and II

Final Fantasy III

Final Fantasy IV

Final Fantasy V

Final Fantasy VI

Final Fantasy VII series

Final Fantasy VIII

Final Fantasy IX

Final Fantasy X

Final Fantasy X-2

Final Fantasy XI

Final Fantasy XII

Final Fantasy XIII

Final Fantasy XIII-2

Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII

Music of Final Fantasy XIV

Music of Final Fantasy XV

Music of Final Fantasy XVI

Final Fantasy Tactics series

Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles series

Chocobo series

Final Fantasy compilation albums

Final Fantasy concerts

Now that Music of Final Fantasy XVI has successfully passed GAN, I'm nominating it as a GT addition to maintain the GT for the series music. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - obvious addition. --PresN 14:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC) (note: I wrote most of the earlier articles)[reply]
• Support Straightforward addition. Congrats on your new GA! -- ZooBlazer 20:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Again, pretty straightforward. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 02:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support igordebraga ≠ 05:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: Straightforward/obvious addition. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: per nom. Idiosincrático (talk) 08:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delegatee comment: Hi @ProtoDrake: this nomination is looking great. I'm wondering, can you add a short summary of the topic to the top (say 3–4 sentences)? You can see an example of one at Wikipedia:Featured topics/Jupiter. This is a new requirement for brand new topics, but it would be great to update some older ones if you have a moment. Aza24 (talk) 00:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Added one based on the lede of the main article. Guess this wasn't a requirement back in 2009 for the original nomination. Feel free to change it however you want, ProtoDrake. --PresN 01:14, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Also pretty self-explanatory and an impressive feat.

Dcdiehardfan (talk) 01:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic – Aza24 (talk) 21:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/1989 (album) for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. Clean (song)
2. 1989 (Taylor's Version)

view | edit | discuss

1989

13 articles

"Welcome to New York"

"Blank Space"

"Style"

"Out of the Woods"

"Shake It Off"

"Bad Blood"

"Wildest Dreams"

"This Love"

"Clean"

"New Romantics"

The 1989 World Tour

1989 (Taylor's Version)

With the newly-promoted FA Welcome to New York (song) and two newly-created GAs Clean (song) and 1989 (Taylor's Version), this topic fortunately still satisfies the criteria of a Featured Topic, so here's the second addition nomination to formalize the inclusion of two new articles. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 02:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: Everything looks good! — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 23:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support igordebraga ≠ 03:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: Appropriately within the topic's scope. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose IMO the new songs that are on the reissue ("Slut!", Say Don't Go, Now That We Don't Talk and Is It Over Now?) should be part of the topic. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Armbrust: They are part of the re-recorded album 1989 (Taylor's Version) and not the original album. They belong to separate scopes. Ippantekina (talk) 10:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Oppose. If Wikiproject Albums want to be incomplete in their coverage of critical accolades, then fine, but it does not mean WP:FA and WP:Featured topics has to put up with it. User:HumanxAnthro (BanjoxKazooie) 17:52, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Can you kindly elaborate on how this topic is “incomplete”? Ippantekina (talk) 00:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral comment The user "HumanxAnthro" has been indefinitely banned for their incivility. Ippantekina (talk) 03:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment from nominator I do not include the 2023 newly-recorded songs Slut!, Now That We Don't Talk, Say Don't Go, Is It Over Now in this topic. The reason is simple: they are not on the album 1989 which was released in 2014 (this topic's central article). They belong to 1989 (Taylor's Version) which is currently being developed into a subtopic at Wikipedia:WikiProject Taylor Swift. Ippantekina (talk) 02:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. This is a full set, for the topic it purports to cover. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:44, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per Gog the Mild. Pamzeis (talk) 04:29, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. All the articles look very good and well-defined.

Gained (talk) 11:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: I do understand the rationale for the oppose arguments, but I believe 1989 and the re-recording are separate enough to warrant separate topics. Having a separate topic for the re-recording with the songs released specifically on that album makes the most sense to me as I think combining everything together could be potentially misleading. Aoba47 (talk) 02:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Closed with consensus to add two new articles. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks Gog the Mild. There's a bot error; could you investigate it? Ippantekina (talk) 07:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• * There was an issue that prevented the promotion bot from promoting this topic. Please solve the issue and run the bot again. The error description is: {{t|User:NovemBot/Promote}} template missing from page. NovemBot (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted.​ Gog the Mild (talk) 14:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• * There was an issue that prevented the promotion bot from promoting this topic. Please solve the issue and run the bot again. The error description is: On page Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/1989 (album)/addition2, {{t|Add to topic}} is present. Bot does not know how to handle these. NovemBot (talk) 15:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Sadly, the bot can't be used on additions. Only on brand new topics at the moment. –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I'll take care of it in a moment. Aza24 (talk) 01:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Main stuff is done. Have to go offline right now but will do the record keeping stuff later. Aza24 (talk) 01:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Billboard number-one country songs for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2023

edit | discuss

Billboard number-one country songs

81 articles

1944

1945

1946

1947

1948

1949

1950

1951

1952

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Adding this year's list, which has just made FL, to the topic..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support nice to see it get updated so quickly. igordebraga ≠ 22:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as a straightforward addition of the latest entry. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - quality edition to a clearly defined topic whose scope it belongs in.--NØ 20:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Aoba47 (talk) 01:38, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Great work on the newest addition to this topic. Pseud 14 (talk) 07:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Congrats on the new FL. Easy support for it to be added to the topic. -- ZooBlazer 09:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Clearly makes sense and is about as straightforward as it gets. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support straightforward addition. NapHit (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Straightforwardest thing ever. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 02:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing with consensus to supplement.--NØ 03:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Final Fantasy series for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. Final Fantasy XVI

edit | discuss

Main Final Fantasy series

17 articles

Final Fantasy

Final Fantasy II

Final Fantasy III

Final Fantasy IV

Final Fantasy V

Final Fantasy VI

Final Fantasy VII

Final Fantasy VIII ^(subtopic)

Final Fantasy IX

Final Fantasy X

Final Fantasy XI

Final Fantasy XII ^(subtopic)

Final Fantasy XIII ^(subtopic)

Final Fantasy XIV

Final Fantasy XV

Final Fantasy XVI

Contributor(s): ProtoDrake

This featured topic was successfully renominated in 2018 after Final Fantasy XV was brought up to GAN. Now, following a question about the topic's validity due to Final Fantasy XVI not being a GA after three months following release, it has been successfully brought through the GAN process. This nomination is to re-complete the topic, which has seen recent maintenance from various editors across the Video Game and Square Enix WikiProjects. Thank you to all who decide to weigh in on this. --ProtoDrake (talk) 21:27, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. This topic becomes more impressive with each additional entry. Well done to all involved. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 22:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support igordebraga ≠ 22:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Thank you to ProtoDrake for keeping this topic alive! --PresN 22:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC) (involved support- FF16 was all ProtoDrake, but I was the lead editor, years and years ago, for FF2, FF4, FF13, and the lead list)[reply]
• Support as a straightforward addition of the latest entry. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as a straightforward addition. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- ZooBlazer 18:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Glad to see this topic is still alive. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 02:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing with consensus to supplement.--NØ 03:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Nebula Award for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. Nebula Award for Best Game Writing
2. Andre Norton Award
3. Ray Bradbury Award

edit | discuss

Nebula Award

9 articles

Novel

Novella

Novelette

Short Story

Script

Game Writing

Andre Norton Award

Ray Bradbury Award

This topic was made back in 2012 when I got the main article and (then) five categories up to GA/FL. Since then, two changes to the awards were made in 2019, which never got reflected in the topic: a category on Game Writing got added (FL'd this year), and the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association retroactively made the Andre Norton Award (FL 2012) and Ray Bradbury Award (FL 2020) official categories instead of the "other awards given at the same event" status that they had. Somehow I completely missed that the topic was getting out of date, so I'm fixing that now. I actively maintain this articles, so the topic should be good to go. --PresN 14:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: All straightforward improvements. Great save! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 01:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Everything looks good to me.--NØ 10:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Good work on updating this! Has my support. --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 16:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom Idiosincrático (talk) 04:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support It all looks good to me. -- ZooBlazer^talk 15:58, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Looks good to me too. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing with consensus to supplement.--NØ 03:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2023

edit | discuss

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest

13 articles

2008

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Renominating to add the most recent participation, 2023, which is now a WP:GA as well. Grk1011 (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: Straightforward addition of the latest iteration. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as a straightforward addition of the latest entry. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:50, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: per nom Idiosincrático (talk) 04:57, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 19:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Pretty straightforward ZooBlazer 03:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: About as straight forward as it gets. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing with consensus to supplement.--NØ 02:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]