Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/April-2015

Featured picture tools
Featured pictures (on Wikimedia Commons) Featured picture criteria Featured picture candidates (on Wikimedia Commons) Featured picture thumbs Featured picture archive Picture of the day (Guidelines) Picture of the day archive (and schedule)
v t e

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.

	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2015 at 01:04:22 (UTC)

Reason

A new article, (co-production). Own article, used. A van Gogh from his last productive period, a bit different from his usual themes. CorinneSD was working together with me on the article, Corinne wrote most of the text in a sandbox.

Articles in which this image appears

Houses at Auvers

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Vincent van Gogh

• Support as nominator – Hafspajen (talk) 01:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as nominator – CorinneSD (talk) 16:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --PetarM (talk) 12:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 10:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 13:46, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support talk→ WPPilot  04:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Vincent van Gogh - Houses at Auvers - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:37, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2015 at 11:02:10 (UTC)

Reason

Good technical quality, appropriate lighting, shows all relevant things (Castles, church, vineyards, factories)

Articles in which this image appears

Rüdesheim am Rhein

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama

Creator

User:DXR

• Support as nominator – DXR (talk) 11:02, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Great! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:51, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - CorinneSD (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support I would be intruiged to see a panorama from the tree-lined spit in the middle of the river, as this looks an interesting riverfront. Plus buildings are more often more interesting from the front... However, nothing negative about this picture - ticks all the boxes and is still interesting... gazhiley 12:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gaz, yes that is a fair argument. However it is pretty much impossible to reach those islands without a boat (and I don't have one). It's probably more practical to take one of the ships that travel on the Rhine, and I will probably do that later in April, but shooting a panorama from a moving object is hard. Also, a big disadvantage of such a frontal panorama would be that would be very wide, probably too wide for many purposes on wiki. --DXR (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DXR no argument intended! Twas just the wishful musings of a lover of civilisation panoramas... I'd say find a nice young man/lady (if you haven't already got one), pack a picnic, and charter a simple single outboard motor boat, and take a trip out there... Enjoy the view, picnic and the company, and while there try a panorama from that side :D ... you're welcome........ hehe gazhiley 16:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support I've been there, this is really wonderful... Godhulii 1985 (talk) 14:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Hafspajen (talk) 20:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Panoramic View of Rüdesheim am Rhein 20140928 1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2015 at 15:32:49 (UTC)

Reason

A super quality image of 16 wood samples

Articles in which this image appears

Wood, Dendrology

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Others

Creator

Anonimski

• Support as nominator – -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - very interesting, especially for an architect or a landscape architect and pity that is not used more. Hafspajen (talk) 19:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Genius idea. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - CorinneSD (talk) 23:57, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support very useful for a core article.©Geni (talk) 01:29, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Great idea, well done. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:16 wood samples.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Added image to Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2015 at 00:23:55 (UTC)

Reason

High quality scan of an important and well-known David portrait. Can't have enough Napoleon!

Articles in which this image appears

Napoleon Crossing the Alps

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Jacques-Louis David

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Napoleon is always Napoleon. Hafspajen (talk) 07:43, 23 March 2015 (UTC) — Except when he's Napoleon Blownapart. Sca (talk)[reply]
• Support – Famous hagiographic image. Sca (talk) 13:04, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 10:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Very nice quality with good EV. SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – What a fantastic painting! CorinneSD (talk) 21:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• ^{It's pure fantasy, all right. Sca (talk) 13:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

• Support Yann (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - One of my all time favorite paintings, right since my class 3rd when I first saw it...-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @Sca, I remember of your peculiar dislike of politicians. He was a political leader. -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Napoleon Bonaparte was a megalomaniac whose military conquests caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands, if not millions. It's not surprising that Napoleon's tomb was one of the half-dozen Paris sights adoringly visited by the conquering Hitler in June 1940. (Too bad the latter failed to learn from the former's experience in Russia.) Sca (talk) 15:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• PS: See Beethoven's ultimate opinion of Napoleon here. Sca (talk) 15:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Napoleon at the Great St. Bernard - Jacques-Louis David - Google Cultural Institute.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reason

A newly discovered, sensational unknown van Gogh. Last chance, Internet will soon be deleted anyway. That's a good reason .... Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet

Articles in which this image appears

No articles, no EV, not very useful. Interesting propaganda artifact, but everbody must oppose due to historical inaccuracy. Consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from participating in the discussion.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/1 April jokes.

Creator

Vincent van Gogh

• Support as nominator – This work comes from the artist's Late Not So Great Period. Some art historians assert he painted it as a commission from the famed German Post-Impressionist Fredinand Porschée, but others note that Porschée then was working as a waiter at an établissement in the 8th arrondissement of Paris, where he could scarcely have been earning the sums required to hire Van Gogh, not even a one-eared Van Gogh. (And BTW, that's pronounced Fahn-Xghowxgh – accent on the second syllable.) Sca (talk) 15:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2015 at 18:58:05 (UTC)

Reason

A Hi-Res images I found of a submarine photographing her prey as the prey sinks to the bottom of the sea. Unusual image to have found, in particular in this day and age.

Articles in which this image appears

Allied submarines in the Pacific War, Japanese destroyer Yamakaze (1936), List of maritime disasters, List of shipwrecks in June 1942, Pacific War, Periscope, Salmon-class submarine, USS Nautilus (SS-168)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War

Creator

United States Navy

• Support as nominator – TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Wow... Amazing shot, and better clarity than I'd expect... Not exactly ever going to replicate such a shot! gazhiley 17:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per above. Born of war, died of war... Brandmeister^talk 21:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Hafspajen (talk) 15:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - CorinneSD (talk) 21:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - War. War. War. And all that. But it is a great freaking shot. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 23:35, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --PetarM (talk) 15:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - I've been on the fence for a bit, out of concern for technical quality, but this was shot in 1942, through a periscope, on a submarine near the surface during the course of action. We're not going to get the best quality, period, and the historical value offsets the technical limitations. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Torpedoed Japanese destroyer Yamakaze sinking on 25 June 1942.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Added image to Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War II instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2015 at 02:48:20 (UTC)

Reason

I believe this image meets the criteria because it is illustrative, encyclopedic and high-quality, and it illustrates the way coin designs are created. This is an early-stage design created by U.S. Mint Chief Engraver Frank Gasparro, but it was ultimately rejected, as were others. The image shows individual pencil marks, illustrating how Gasparro's concepts became reality. This is my first FP nomination, so I apologize in advance if I've made any mistakes along the way.-RHM22 (talk) 02:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles in which this image appears

Susan B. Anthony dollar

FP category for this image

Artwork/Others

Creator

Originally created by Frank Gasparro, uploaded by RHM22

• Support as nominator – RHM22 (talk) 02:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw I'm not certain of the methods used here, but could someone please withdraw this candidate, as a procedural error? Thanks in advance.-RHM22 (talk) 15:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2015 at 20:28:24 (UTC)

Reason

High quality reproduction of a notable painting, and therefore high EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Tribuna of the Uffizi (painting) (most EV), Johann Zoffany, +15 others

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Johann Zoffany

• Support as nominator – Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Samsara 01:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Great painting. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, superb indeed, especially at high resolution. Brandmeister^talk 21:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I think I saw this in Crisco's que. I was confering with him before on this painting, and he said he would like to nominate it. Shall we not at least ask to take something from that que - or at least co-nom? Hafspajen (talk) 21:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I really don't mind. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Because you are nice. But you should be credited if someone is nominating from your que. Hafspajen (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• If I'd written the article just to get this at FPC, maybe. But if it's just sitting there gathering dust... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I think finding a good picture is a creative effort too. It is different when it comes to artwork, than nominating somebody's own photo, because then they both get credited. I think we should show respect to each other, Sincerely, Hafspajen (talk) 17:55, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Very interesting painting. --Janke | Talk 06:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 10:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – I wonder, even though it was the style at that time to squeeze a lot of paintings onto the walls, whether Zoffany thought there were too many or just thought it was normal. ^{Hafs, what's "que" - "Crisco's que"?} - CorinneSD (talk) 21:03, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Queue, i.e. that collection of 60 or so images (right now) on my talk page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:58, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: Fylbecatulous talk 02:11, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Johan Zoffany - Tribuna of the Uffizi - Google Art Project.jpg ---The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 03:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 8 support, 0 oppose -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 03:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2015 at 16:06:08 (UTC)

Reason

Clear and useful picture; good cut out

Articles in which this image appears

Saffron +1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Food and drink

Creator

Hubertl

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Samsara 17:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Salute thee, the most expensive spice of the planet...-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 12:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as a co-author ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as whatever may be. :) Jee 09:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – CorinneSD (talk) 20:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 13:44, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: Fylbecatulous talk 02:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Safran-Weinviertel Niederreiter 2 Gramm 8285.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2015 at 21:21:54 (UTC)

Reason

I thought this one deserved a second chance. A high-quality photograph of a fairly well-known academic. To pre-empt the claim that this is just a simple posed photograph: short of that pose, this is about as close as we are going to get to an "action shot" of a philosopher- the use of the watch and the stain-glass background are very much deliberate.

Articles in which this image appears

William Lane Craig

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers

Creator

Unknown; photograph from William Craig's press kit

• Support as nominator – Josh Milburn (talk) 21:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, still artificial facial expression with distrcting background. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 04:24, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – An "Official Press Release Photo" from a press kit assembled to promote a book. The pose, composition and subject's expression are stilted and unnatural – comprising a PR effort that is mediocre at best, IMO. Negligible EV. Sca (talk) 13:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Clichéd pose; no personality. 86.152.162.108 (talk) 14:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Phoniest smile I ever saw... almost repulsive. --Janke | Talk 12:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Poor Craig... I guess the situation is hopeless. This looks a bit better, but no good as a FP. Hafspajen (talk) 12:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Not Good - National Names 2000 (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:36, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2015 at 15:58:41 (UTC)

Reason

A high quality astro image with great EV

Articles in which this image appears

M 81

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out

Creator

Ken Crawford

• Support as nominator – -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, only because File:Messier81 highres.jpg is below the minimum resolution and this is still a great image. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - If Crisco 1492 says the res is up to snuff, I would love to see this on the main page. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 02:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, - Hafspajen (talk) 00:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 20:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - CorinneSD (talk) 01:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:M81.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2015 at 23:43:31 (UTC)

Reason

Interesting self-portrait by Salvator Rosa. Wish my hair could be like that.

Articles in which this image appears

Salvator Rosa +4

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers

Creator

Salvator Rosa

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Iconic painting. Hafspajen (talk) 04:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - My hair too..-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 05:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 10:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• ^{What does the text say in his hand? Hafspajen (talk) 02:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

• AUT TACE AUT LOQUERE MELIORA SILENTIO
  ^{Either keep quiet or say something better than silence.
  Sca (talk) 14:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

• ^{Guy has attitude. Hafspajen (talk) 15:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

• Support – CorinneSD (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Self-portrait by Salvator Rosa.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2015 at 04:58:25 (UTC)

Reason

A high quality astro image with great EV

Articles in which this image appears

December 2010 lunar eclipse

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out

Creator

John Vermette

• Support as nominator – -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 04:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Looks like some serious JPG artefacting. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where? -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 05:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Throughout the whole picture. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. Very noticeable artifacting. Also, I'm no specialist in licenses, but the photographer's site specifies that "all images here are copyright by John Vermette. Use as you wish, but please give proper credit." Is that really all the criteria needed for it to be posted under a CC-BY-SA license? Joshua Garner (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2015 at 05:32:29 (UTC)

Reason

This was not a easy photo to get, the plane I was in is pressurized so the cockpit glass is always going to be a issue but this is one of the best, from the flight. I am flying at about 10,000 feet at the time this was taken departing out of Montgomery Field climbing like a rocket ship. The photo shows just about the entire city of La Jolla, California

Articles in which this image appears

La Jolla, California

FP category for this image

places

Creator

WPPilot

• Support as nominator – talk→ WPPilot  05:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak support - there appears to be a very slight amount of motion blur, but overall this is much better than the most recent nomination. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – CorinneSD (talk) 20:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - National Names 2000 (talk) 04:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Not enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2015 at 10:11:00 (UTC)

Reason

A dramatic, notable painting, own article, and 5,126 × 8,881 pixels. The artwork is from 1619, and was a painting intended for private devotion for the Tuscan ambassador to Rome, for his private chapel in Florence. It depicts the Resurrection of Christ, the moment described in the Gospel of Matthew 28:2:There was a violent earthquake, for an angel of the Lord came down from heaven and, going to the tomb, rolled back the stone and sat on it. And his appearance was like lightning, and his clothing as white as snow ...

Articles in which this image appears

The Resurrection (Cecco del Caravaggio)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Cecco del Caravaggio

• Support as co-nominator – — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as co-nominator – Hafspajen (talk) 16:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – CorinneSD (talk) 20:29, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – nice scan with good EV. SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 06:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Francesco Buoneri, called Cecco del Caravaggio - The Resurrection - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2015 at 22:55:32 (UTC)

Reason

Fantastic scan of a fantastic picture

Articles in which this image appears

A Session of the Painting Jury, Henri Gervex

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Henri Gervex

• Support as nominator – SchroCat (talk) 22:55, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Wohoo, this is the guy who made "Rolla". Hafspajen (talk) 04:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• It's a massive and superb picture that I spent ages in front of last week - the detail is superbly done. -SchroCat (talk) 10:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - CorinneSD (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – interesting painting; good EV from the article. Looks as if the painting of the nude they're voting for was popular. SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:36, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^{Unfair. They should vote nude. Hafspajen (talk) 20:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

^{No, no! – that could result in electile dysfunction! Sca (talk) 21:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

Promoted File:Henri Gervex - A Session of the Painting Jury - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2015 at 23:54:59 (UTC)

Reason

High resolution/quality of a rather attractive bird. Though this was taken in captivity, it doesn't show it.

Articles in which this image appears

Dusky lory +1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Chris Woodrich

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Nice. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 02:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Hafspajen (talk) 03:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Support – Nice, but it would have been better had the tail been in focus. —Bruce1ee^talk 05:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sadly the day was somewhat overcast, so I had to resort to a lower f number. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support The background is already very busy; so I don't think a small aperture will be helpful. Jee 09:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Nice, never seen this species before. Brandmeister^talk 16:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Looks friendly. Sca (talk) 22:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dusky lory (Pseudeos fuscata), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 03.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2015 at 09:15:08 (UTC)

Reason

Beautiful Audubon colour engraving of the world's most fabulous fowl. Oh, that haughty posture—makes me hungry!

Articles in which this image appears

John James Audubon, The Birds of America, Turkey (bird)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

John James Audubon

• Support as nominator – Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 09:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Gorgeous... but is it just me, or are the margins a bit tight? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• That was done purposely to provide maximal turkey. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 11:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Perhaps, but I doubt the original engraving had the lower land right up to the margins. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• In the top left-hand corner there is some text that looks like it should say "No 1", but most of the "N" is chopped off. 109.153.225.26 (talk) 14:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Print techniques can differ from edition to edition, depending on how they use the paper and the plate. However the rest is 7,787 × 11,601 pixels and magnifique. Hafspajen (talk) 15:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Like here
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• I doubt that what we see is the true left edge of the print. Possibly the print has been cut out of a book, and the "No. 1" text disappeared into the spine. The left-hand edge is odd. At first it looks ragged, and I thought it was the actual cut edge, but looking more closely it seems to have been cropped in a series of slightly stepped exact straight lines, as if done in multiple stages in an image editor for some reason. I'm not saying it's a big deal; it's just puzzling. 109.152.147.122 (talk) 18:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I am now officially announcing a big secret: the World is a Mystery- Hafspajen (talk) 18:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - most of the engraving's he made are tight in the The Birds of America. Hafspajen (talk) 11:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - That is one impressive and personable turkey. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 12:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Amazing! - National Names 2000 (talk) 12:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Really nice image. ^{Last fall I saw two wild turkeys walk side-by-side down a sidewalk in town, right near me. They were about four feet tall, and they just ignored me and kept walking.} - CorinneSD (talk) 19:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - The source file for this image has a damaged left margin which was cropped off leaving no margin at all on the bottom left with slivers missing in two places. The "restoration" has left visible areas of off-color cloning as well. Is this image rare enough to overlook these problem?--Godot13 (talk) 08:15, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Godot's findings. That should be fixable by revisiting the source image. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Agreed. We can do better than this. It's also poorly documented - no uploading of the original scan, for example. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 08:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, it is definitely worth. Yes, Godot13 Crisco 1492 - Adam Cuerden - the image is an extremly high qualty drawing - and is rare enough to be worth the energy put into, it is the very first image in the utterly notable book The Birds of America, an illustration made of the utterly notable artist John James Audubon, one of his finest images. I imagine Curly Turkey wouldn't have anything against sharing the nomination with anyne who puts the energy into that restoration ... (category should probably be illustration, though). Hafspajen (talk) 19:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose ...in its current state. Hafs, I agree with you about the EV/importance of the image. Sadly (I suspect) we are looking at (source image) the end result of what happened when someone decided to break up one of the books without taking proper care. Instead of taking the book apart at the binding, they may have cut out the plates. If the left margin can be properly restored (along with some light cleaning of more prominent spots), I will support it.--Godot13 (talk) 21:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, Adam said he can try. Later. But if they are taken from a book, than it can be difficult to get a good scan. Maybe suspend? Hafspajen (talk) 23:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• ' Comment' - Here is the original. I think that under the circumstances I do understand why it was uploaded like it was uploaded. The N you were remarking about is gone on the original, it is damaged and not visible. But the rest is fine. Sometimes I sincerely have difficulties understanding this kind of perfectionism. Hafspajen (talk) 23:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC).[reply]

• Because we actually have people who can fix thaat much better than this is? Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 01:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I have to agree with Adam on this. A missing part of a letter is fixable. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks like the paper is missing too... that the letter was on. Hafspajen (talk) 02:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• There is only a 62.5% support for promotion, which isn't enough for the image to become featured. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2015 at 07:04:15 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image, high EV. A rare double denominated gold coin (10 Dalere, 50 Francs) issued only in 1904.

Articles in which these images appear

Danish West Indian daler, Christian IX of Denmark

FP category for this image

Currency

Creator

Kingdom of Denmark for the Danish West Indies.
From the National Numismatic Collection, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution.

• Support as nominator – Godot13 (talk) 07:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - I bet that series could have its own article! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:54, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 13:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Hafspajen (talk) 02:22, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Bammesk (talk) 02:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Danish West Indies 1904 10 Daler.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2015 at 21:05:22 (UTC)

Reason

Found this high-res version accidentally, while searching for Edward Poynter. Perhaps time to roll this out.

Articles in which this image appears

The Roses of Heliogabalus, Lawrence Alma-Tadema, Victorian painting, others

FP category for this image

Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Lawrence Alma-Tadema

• Support as nominator – Brandmeister^talk 21:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• ^{Comment- Did you uploaded a new? This was no good before.... Hafspajen (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2015 (UTC)}[reply]
  • ^{Yes, uploaded over the existing one, source has been updated.} Brandmeister^talk 07:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Yeah, it's a new file. And gorgeous. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - great pic. Hafspajen (talk) 00:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - National Names 2000 (talk) 01:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 11:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Roses of Heliogabalus.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2015 at 23:39:35 (UTC)

Reason

One of the finalists in POTY, this image has pretty good EV in Nakhi people and is used in several other articles. Technical quality is, of course, assured.

Articles in which this image appears

Nakhi people +2

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Traditional dress

Creator

Uwe Aranas

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – ^{Crisco, what does "this image has pretty good in Nakhi people" mean?} CorinneSD (talk) 00:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • (EV; added) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Hafspajen (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Interesting composition. (Text should locate Nakhi-inhabited region — south-central China?) Sca (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Great picture, but it would benefit from more information about what is being depicted in the "performance" and the context in which it is taking place. 109.156.50.218 (talk) 19:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I agree. - CorinneSD (talk) 21:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Info The performance in the open air theatre of Lijiang, which includes some hundreds actors, is showing different traditions and lifestyles of the Naxi, Yi, and Bai people of the Yunnan area. The depicted scene shows especially the traditional clothing of the Naxi women (which is still worn in the daily life of the Naxi people) and is also a hommage to the Naxi women which used to carry heavy loads in big bamboo baskets, for example hay and fresh grass for the cattle. I hope, this explanation might help. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk • contribs) 08:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose Can the EV be there if this is not actually a picture of a person from the Yunnan area in their natural clothing? Surely a performance by an actor cannot be used to demonstrate anything other than acting? The rest is just down to the quality of the costume designer and director of the show - it's entirely their interpretation. And unless Yunnan people traditionally frequent the stages of open air theatres, then this isn't showing them in the correct situation either... gazhiley 16:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Did you read Uwe's post about the outfits? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes Crisco 1492 - that's why I opposed - confirmation that this is a theatre show, not actual people in their actual clothes. gazhiley 12:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Maybe the photo would be best considered for illustrating a type of outdoor theater in China. That's quite a backdrop for theater. CorinneSD (talk) 19:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's one of the articles it's used in too, but there's less discussion there. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:41, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand, these traditions and lifestyles are very much alive, and people are proud of them. Hafspajen (talk) 00:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – SchroCat (talk) 10:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Hubertl (talk) 16:36, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lijiang Yunnan China-Naxi-people-carrying-baskets-01.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Added it to Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2015 at 16:11:04 (UTC)

Reason

scenic photo of Schwäbisch Hall for Christmas/New year holidays

Articles in which this image appears

Schwäbisch Hall, Christmas lights

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

Petar Milošević

• Support as nominator – PetarM (talk) 16:11, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support this is a wonderful example of night photography, clear and crisp with fine detail. --talk→ WPPilot  04:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Technically a great shot. Composition feels a bit cramped to me. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose The building is partially obscured by the tree - a picture taken further to the right giving a front-on view would be much better. It would also demonstrate clearer the subject, as potentially it could be about any of the buildings in the picture - none of them are front and centred. Technically good, but not good enough EV wise for me gazhiley 16:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is the Marktplatz (presumably the town's central square), not one specific building. ("Schwäbisch Hall" is a town, not a building; not sure if there is any confusion there...) 86.155.201.128 (talk) 13:57, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• OpposeThe cropping of the aerials is a level of editing I'm not really happy with. Resulting image is still rather cramped and the camera is struggling with the varying light levels (the lights blending together on the center far left and on the building just to the right of the town hall). Might be worth trying to shoot at ISO200 (E-P5 native iso) in future. You are sacrificing dynamic range by jumping to 320. Otherwise shoot in raw and mess with the curves in post or its time to break out the HDR (with care).©Geni (talk) 07:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm sorry, but I think these objections about the lighting are ridiculous. (Can't see any cropping of aerials either.) 86.155.201.128 (talk) 11:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I would also disagree with the objections raised above. @86.155.201.128: please use a account to register your comments, its much more helpful but I have to agree with you here. talk→ WPPilot  16:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Check the historical uploads the antennas were edited shorter in the last upload.©Geni (talk) 12:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment @©Geni, Antenna was shortened due to remarks by some, but not by croping. Image isnt downsized. Photo is almost at full size - 96 %. ISO 320 vs ISO 200 wouldnt be resolved by your eyes and sky noise was deleveled for beeing better. No use of HDR at such scene, everything is perfect enligthed as it should be. --PetarM (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - that's a Christmas tree, and it is winter. Hafspajen (talk) 11:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Per WPPilot. Sca (talk) 15:58, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Wonderful example of night photography, very nice.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 12:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - I can't find anything bad and the tree do not pose any serious threat for the picture. -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 08:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: no objections. Fylbecatulous talk 14:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Schwäbisch Hall in winter.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2015 at 19:26:46 (UTC)

Reason

Excellent scan of a lovely painting

Articles in which this image appears

A Lady with a Squirrel and a Starling, Hans Holbein the Younger, Azurite + 2 others

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Hans Holbein the Younger

• Support as nominator – SchroCat (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Interesting. Sca (talk) 01:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:03, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Almost photographic. Brandmeister^talk 12:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Hafspajen (talk) 12:35, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --PetarM (talk) 20:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lady with a Squirrel.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image of Georgette Seabrooke[1] was mistakenly identified as Augusta Savage in 2011. The error was discovered and corrected in 2018. It has been renominated as a Featured Picture at Featured picture candidates/Georgette Seabrooke.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2015 at 21:49:27 (UTC)

Reason

high resolution image with restoration

Articles in which this image appears

Augusta Savage

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers

Creator

(unknown) Harmon Foundation / NARA, uploaded and restored by Yann

• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 21:49, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Nice and useful. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Bammesk (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Can't find any reason to oppose..-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 12:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - National Names 2000 (talk) 04:53, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Georgette Seabrooke - NARA - 31491640.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2015 at 23:46:41 (UTC)

Reason

High quality scan of a pretty good portrait. Very useful for the article. Not that many British statesmen from the period featured.

Articles in which this image appears

Charles Townshend, 2nd Viscount Townshend +10 or so

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political

Creator

After Godfrey Kneller

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Chris, how about his hair? Hafspajen (talk) 07:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Too curly for me. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^{He needs 'volumizing' shampoo. Sca (talk) 15:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

• Support - SchroCat (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SagaciousPhil - Chat 14:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - National Names 2000 (talk) 04:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Charles Townshend, 2nd Viscount Townshend by Sir Godfrey Kneller, Bt (2).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2015 at 07:20:58 (UTC)

Reason

High quality painting, of an elaborate sophistication and complexity by Ambrosius Bosschaert the Elder ( 1573 – 1621) a highly successful still life painter of the Dutch Golden Age. When tulips became a luxury item, a profusion of varieties followed, like the ones in the painting, white and yellow with red strips. These paintings are valuable as historic documents for botanical purposes, since the flowers are depicted with great accuracy.

Articles in which this image appears

Ambrosius Bosschaert, Flower, Northern Mannerism, Social history of viruses, Still life

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Ambrosius Bosschaert the Elder

• Support as nominator – Hafspajen (talk) 07:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:03, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- Lovely. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 14:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Bammesk (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ambrosius Bosschaert the Elder (Dutch - Flower Still Life - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:45, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2015 at 07:10:42 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

List of works by Vincent van Gogh

FP category for this image

Creator

Vincent van Gogh

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 07:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Seriously, we've got van Gogh pouring out of our every orifice. We don't need to nominate a van Gogh that doesn't have its own article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:52, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy close - We already have a version of this featured: here. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:58, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted ---The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 11:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Quick close, already featured -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 11:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2015 at 03:35:27 (UTC)

Reason

The Royal Navy ballistic missile submarine HMS Vanguard (S28), photographed as she arrives back at HM Naval Base Clyde, Faslane, Scotland following a patrol, November 2010.

Articles in which this image appears

Her Majesty's Naval Service, List of active Royal Navy ships, Royal Navy, Scotland, Vanguard-class submarine

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water

Creator

CPOA(Phot) Tam McDonald

• Support as nominator – TomStar81 (Talk) 03:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Fine atmospheric shot. Sca (talk) 15:48, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – a nice shot, specially the background..-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 12:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Godhulii 1985 (talk) 18:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I really like this image, but is there a way to fix the posterization in the sky? --Godot13 (talk) 23:32, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hafspajen (talk) 00:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Vanguard at Faslane 02.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2015 at 03:49:54 (UTC)

Reason

A short film created to exploit the international backlash against the Imperial German Navy in the aftermath of the 7 May 1915 attack by U-20 Kapitänleutnant Walther Schwieger that left 1,198 of the passengers dead. This animated film The Sinking of the Lusitania (1918) by American cartoonist and animator Winsor McCay. In the film two submarines torpedo the RMS Lusitania in 1915, killing 1 200. It is thought that this is the first animated documentary, and at the time it was released this was the longest animated film made until Disney's feature-length films of the 1930s.

Articles in which this image appears

Animated documentary, Sinking of the RMS Lusitania, The Sinking of the Lusitania, Winsor McCay

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War I

Creator

Winsor McCay

• Support as nominator – TomStar81 (Talk) 03:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• I think Curly mentioned that he'd gotten a Winsor McCay DVD with these films. Any news on that? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'd love to support, but is this the best copy available? As is, it appears to be a mish-mash composited of clips from several prints, some more worn and scratched than others, and a few titles are even in negative form. I doubt this was intentional, originally. --Janke | Talk 06:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • If Curly's got the DVD, that would probably be the best copy available. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Interesting propaganda artifact, but must oppose due to historical inaccuracy: The myth of a second torpedo, and even a second U-boat, misleadingly propagated by the British Admiralty at the time, has been debunked in recent decades by historical research and underwater exploration. (Theories regarding the "second explosion" have included secretly shipped munitions and, more recently, a boiler or steam-pipe rupture. Neither hypothesis has been proven conclusively.) Sca (talk) 15:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• You're opposing the promotion of a copy of a historically significant and widely studied work because the work itself presents an incorrect view of the world? If this was being used to illustrate the sinking itself, perhaps (just as we might worry about The Creation of Adam in an article about human evolution...), but surely the EV comes from the article on the film itself? Josh Milburn (talk) 16:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Josh, understand your rationale – but still oppose FPs that tend to perpetuate historical distortions, often accepted uncritically by general audiences. (Would not classify this film as a "documentary." But this isn't the place to rehash the Lusitania episode.) Sca (talk) 17:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2015 at 05:56:09 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image of this waterfall

Articles in which this image appears

Curug Cipendok

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

Chris Woodrich

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Noisy at full size. Brandmeister^talk 08:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fixed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. Compositionally and aesthetically, it's great, but the image quality is a bit lacking. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 21:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Diliff, what do you think about the version before I denoised for Brandmeister? I deliberately did not denoise all that much so that the fine details were preserved. Also, I've uploaded a new version with less drastic processing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - looks rather spectacular enlarged. Hafspajen (talk) 12:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:34, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2015 at 21:26:59 (UTC)

Reason

Original file 18,001 × 11,714 pixels, one of Peder Severin Krøyer's best known and best-loved work is entitled Summer Evening on Skagen's Southern Beach with Anna Ancher and Marie Krøyer, 1893.

Articles in which this image appears

Summer Evening on Skagen's Southern Beach, Peder Severin Krøyer, P. S. Krøyer's paintings of Marie, Skagen Painters

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

P.S. Krøyer

• Support as nominator – Hafspajen (talk) 21:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - CorinneSD (talk) 01:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• ^{Oppose - Original looks like it was upsampled. Let me try downsampling again.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)}[reply]
  • Anything bigger than 3000px wide looks terrible... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sample it down. Hafspajen (talk) 02:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support now — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 13:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Per Haffy, who didn't understood me. -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 04:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Lovely – I have a weakness for Skagens. Sca (talk) 15:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: this is beautiful. Fylbecatulous talk 13:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:P.S. Krøyer - Summer evening on Skagen's Beach. Anna Ancher and Marie Krøyer walking together. - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2015 at 01:38:07 (UTC)

Reason

High quality scan of this painting, showing an important person from an underrepresented area.

Articles in which this image appears

Mehmed IV

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility

Creator

Unknown

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Hafspajen (talk) 06:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 13:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - He has a bit attitude..-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 12:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Herald, people may actually read that as an oppose — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• It will not matter (1 more !vote to go) till Armbrust reads it so..-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose redirect to suppose, I guess is a joke... hope it will not sink nomination, though. Hafspajen (talk) 14:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I fear of it now. We used to do this in RfA. Above all, this is not a redirect, its a pipe only.. -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 14:43, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank God for User:Jobas. Hafspajen (talk) 13:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Yahoo.. )=3 -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sultan Mehmed IV (2).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2015 at 02:50:09 (UTC)

Reason

I believe this image meets the criteria because it is illustrative, encyclopedic and high-quality, and it illustrates the way coin designs are created. This is an early-stage design created by U.S. Mint Chief Engraver Frank Gasparro, but it was ultimately rejected, as were others. The image shows individual pencil marks, illustrating how Gasparro's concepts became reality.

Articles in which this image appears

Susan B. Anthony dollar

FP category for this image

Artwork/Others

Creator

Originally created by Frank Gasparro, uploaded by RHM22

• Support as nominator – RHM22 (talk) 02:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• The quality is good, but I'd nominate just the one. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry, Crisco 1492! I wasn't sure if two were allowed here. I'll remove the other one.-RHM22 (talk) 15:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• You could also nominate as a set, but I think a lone nomination would be fine as well... anyways,

• support - Very good scan. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the support, Crisco! I wasn't sure how to nominate a set, so I just nominated both. Apologies for that breach of protocol.-RHM22 (talk) 01:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support- Interesting and good EV.--Godot13 (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support- just one left, and I did my thinking on this-Hafspajen (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - National Names 2000 (talk) 03:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:1979 right-facing Susan B. Anthony design.jpeg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Added image to Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Currency instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2015 at 23:39:42 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image of a very notable writer

Articles in which this image appears

Junot Díaz

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers

Creator

Tsar Fedorsky for the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; edited by Chris Woodrich (dustspots, crop)

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - He looks nice and interesting. Hafspajen (talk) 20:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I note that the metadata credits the author "Tsar Fedorsky" and the copyright holder "Tsar Fedorsky Photography 2012". I trust the MacArthur Foundation to understand when they can and can't release images under a free license, but perhaps this could be cleaned up on the image page? Josh Milburn (talk) 09:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Edited the "author" field. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support looks relaxed and fairly natural...--Godot13 (talk) 23:26, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Fine with me. -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 05:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Blacknclick (talk) 09:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Nice lighting and good job on aperture control to defuse the background WPPilot (talk) 00:15, 11 April 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2015 at 01:49:42 (UTC)

Reason

High Resolution + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Saaremaa

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Abrget47j

• Support as nominator – National Names 2000 (talk) 01:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Nice composition. —Bruce1ee^talk 04:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Image is used in a gallery only (low EV) and subject is not photographed from its front (not the best composition). – Editør (talk) 11:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - I think the "rear angle" invites a nice invitation to consider the inner workings. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 16:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:03, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Not enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:03, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2015 at 02:09:52 (UTC)

Reason

Good Quality

Articles in which this image appears

The Fighting Temeraire (Own Article), National Gallery +20

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

J. M. W. Turner

• Support as nominator – National Names 2000 (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose original - Great painting, terrible upload (has been digitally manipulated).` — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• comment Didn't we had a better scan somewhere-?Hafspajen (talk) 04:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't this picture feature in the James Bond film Skyfall? TomStar81 (Talk) 07:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @Crisco 1492 and Hafspajen:..Added the alt and Support Alt 1 or 2 but oppose original..-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Might as well get the original size while we're at it. I'll do that. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• @Crisco 1492: Hang on I found it. Hafspajen (talk) 15:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I uploaded this? <gasp> — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support ALT2. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ALT2. bigger file. Hafspajen (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ALT2--Godot13 (talk) 23:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Fighting Temeraire, JMW Turner, National Gallery.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Only alt 2 has enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2015 at 03:59:18 (UTC)

Reason

EV. This is the best known portrait of Louis Pasteur, French chemist and microbiologist - depicting him in his laboratory, painted by Finnish painter Albert Edelfelt (1854 – 1905) in 1885.
Louis Pasteur is an absolute giant in the field of medicine, humanity has a lot to thank him. Thank you, Pasteur. Albert Edelfelt is a rather good painter, too. The painting of Louis Pasteur won him the Legion of Honour in 1886 at the exhibition at the Paris Salon.
Louis Pasteur owned this picture and kept it in his dining room.

Articles in which this image appears

Pasteur's portrait by Edelfelt, Louis Pasteur, Germ theory of disease, History of biology, History of zoology (since 1859), Immunity (medical), Medicine, Microbiology, Microorganism, Vitalism, Yeast in winemaking, Albert Edelfelt, + more

FP category for this image

I guess Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings, own article

Creator

Albert Edelfelt

• Support as nominator – Hafspajen (talk) 03:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Very nice. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Excellent. --Janke | Talk 12:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Interesting historical illustration – (EV) – by a relatively unknown artist. (Also like his Two Women with Laundry.) Sca (talk) 15:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – SchroCat (talk) 10:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – talk→ WPPilot  19:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Albert Edelfelt - Louis Pasteur - 1885.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2015 at 11:12:58 (UTC)

Reason

Good scan of the great portrait

Articles in which this image appears

La Schiavona + 1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Titian

• Support as nominator – SchroCat (talk) 11:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Very good scan. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Hafspajen (talk) 09:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - another excellent scan from Google Art; although the article on the painting could use some work, it is sufficient to provide some EV. SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Titian - Portrait of a Lady ('La Schiavona') - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2015 at 23:41:07 (UTC)

Reason

High quality scan of this painting; we could use some heartwarming scenes

Articles in which this image appears

The Elder Sister +1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

William-Adolphe Bouguereau

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Good pick. Bouguereau deserves to be featurable. Brandmeister^talk 08:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - So cute girl she is..-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 12:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Very présentable work from this artist. Sca (talk) 14:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: Fylbecatulous talk 13:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:William Bouguereau - The Elder Sister - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2015 at 06:50:18 (UTC)

Reason

Excellent scan of a beautiful painting

Articles in which this image appears

A Winter Scene with Skaters near a Castle

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Hendrick Avercamp

• Support as nominator – SchroCat (talk) 06:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Winter! ^{Ahem: one of the first landscape painters of the 17th-century Dutch school, to be all correct; who specialized in painting the Netherlands in winter; Sca made me study the subject thoroughly....} Hafspajen (talk) 08:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Strikingly Bruegelesque, though a bit softer in tone. Cozy.

PS: I find it impossible to make Swedes do anything they don't secretly want to do.

Sca (talk) 13:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - Very nice painting. CorinneSD (talk) 21:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support I like this one very much. --PetarM (talk) 05:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hendrick Averkamp A Winter Scene with Skaters near a Castle.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:53, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2015 at 11:59:54 (UTC)

Reason

Here we have a famous/infamous man in United States History: George Armstrong Custer, Lt. Col, U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment. While his service with the 7th Cavalry Regiment is what cemented his place in history (to the misfortune of both him and his men I am sure), his military career is a noteworthy one spanning both the U.S. Civil War and the Indian Wars. This image of Custer, taken in April 1865, shows the cavalry commander adorned is his Union Officers Uniform, which reflects his then brevetted rank of Major General, which he held for most of the Civil War. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles in which this image appears

Battle of Waynesboro, Virginia, George Armstrong Custer

FP category for this image

Coin toss. Best two candidates are Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American Civil War and Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military

Creator

Unattributed

• Support as nominator – TomStar81 (Talk) 11:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • IMPORTANT COMMENT: I didn't realize this at the time, but apparently a similar image of Custer already holds FP status: File:G a custer.jpg. Under our current FPC criteria, and accounting for the presence of a similar FP of the subject in question, this should properly be a candidate for delisting and replacing. I apologize for not noticing that earlier. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose It's a rather extreme crop, undersized because of that, and, while I could accept the flaws in the original format, I can't accept them in what it's been turned into. Pretty sure we could do better than either extant one. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 14:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Below minimum resolution. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2015 at 20:37:55 (UTC)

• Two picture galleries with views of Rome, ancient and modern
• 
  Ancient Rome (1757)
• 
  Modern Rome (1757)

Reason

Modern Rome and Ancient Rome (1757) by Giovanni Paolo Panini; painted as a pair of pendant paintings for the Count de Stainville. Ancient Rome shows many of the most significant architectural sites and sculptures from the time, while Modern Rome shows the arrangement of paintings originally commissioned by de Stainville, who was the ambassador to Rome from between 1753 and 1757. Both Panini and de Stainville appear in the paintings.

Articles in which this image appears

Modern Rome, Ancient Rome, Giovanni Paolo Panini, Pendant painting

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Giovanni Paolo Panini

• Support as nominator – SchroCat (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ^{I'm just curious: why aren't both images the same size?} – CorinneSD (talk) 21:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Different holders. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Hafspajen (talk) 14:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Giovanni Paolo Panini – Ancient Rome.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:Giovanni Paolo Panini – Modern Rome.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2015 at 23:44:07 (UTC)

Reason

Very high resolution, high quality image of the hot springs.

Articles in which this image appears

Pancuran Tujuh

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama

Creator

Chris Woodrich

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Interesting, devil may cry it's not hell sulfur :) Brandmeister^talk 09:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - good EV.--Godot13 (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support yes, good EV! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – CorinneSD (talk) 21:38, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pancuran Tujuh, near Baturraden, Purwokerto 2015-03-23 03.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2015 at 13:01:24 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image, high EV. Rare in this (high) grade.

Articles in which these images appear

Japanese yen

FP category for this image

Currency

Creator

Continental Bank Note Company (later the American Bank Note Company), for the Constitutional monarchy of Japan.
From the National Numismatic Collection, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution.
Image by Godot13.

Notes

• Support as nominator – Godot13 (talk) 13:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - I've had a yen for more currency noms. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yuan me both. Sca (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hafspajen (talk) 14:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:JAPAN-10-Constitutional Monarchy-One Yen (1873).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2015 at 19:33:30 (UTC)

Reason

A high quality depcition of a beautiful bee adding to the articles. The previous nomination (seven years ago, here) was not fair, in my opinion.

Articles in which this image appears

Anthidium, Anthidium florentinum

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Alvesgaspar (talk)

• Support as nominator – Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – CorinneSD (talk) 21:37, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - This one's just plain beautiful. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hafspajen (talk) 14:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - another wonderful macro picture. talk→ WPPilot  19:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Blacknclick (talk) 09:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Anthidium February 2008-1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:39, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2015 at 20:15:02 (UTC)

Reason

A quality image with good EV. First nom failed just because of some problems which are now fixed up.

Articles in which this image appears

Gorakhpur Junction railway station

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Benison.

• Support as nominator – -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 20:15, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – CorinneSD (talk) 21:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose The reasons for my oppose are the same, and cannot be fixed without a re-take... The mist obscures too much of the station, and the focus just isn't right due to the mist and light... Very unsharp... Would need to be re-taken on a bright sunny day to change my vote... gazhiley 13:08, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• OpposeSupport I have to agree with gazhiley, while I do like the photo, I think it would be a wonderful one if taken with blue sky, or perhaps sunset/sunrise so you have some additional color and depth to this. I am going to support this for it composition as I had noted before. talk→ WPPilot  16:08, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - has depth, feels like a railway station. Atsme☯^Consult 16:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Gorakhpur Junction railway station.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:19, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Added image to Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:19, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2015 at 21:26:37 (UTC)

Reason

Detailed and high quality depiction of the village of Cardona, adding to the article

Articles in which this image appears

Cardona, Spain

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama

Creator

Alvesgaspar (talk)

• Support as nominator – Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:26, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - The picture appears to be nothing more than showing the roofs of houses, which diminishes the EV in my view. But I am reluctant to vote Oppose on this since the quality is decent. Would like to hear what others have to say before I proceed with my vote. Étienne Dolet (talk) 01:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - In light of Crisco's comment. I just wish it was zoomed out more. That way, the EV would've been much more better. As of now, this picture does not have the quality effect the beautiful city of Cardona deserves. Étienne Dolet (talk) 03:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I get the feeling that if you'd have been able to get a bit further out, the results would have been better. Right now it feels cramped compared to our village FPs (Ambleside is among the better ones, but even more urban areas such as Bath have a bit of space for framing). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2015 at 21:50:59 (UTC)

Reason

An excellent depiction of a nice looking hoverfly, much adding to the article

Articles in which this image appears

Eristalinus taeniops

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Alvesgaspar (talk)

• Support as nominator – Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – CorinneSD (talk) 22:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Admittedly we already have a current FP, but this is better for IDing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Sharp "Macro" photo. Nice. --talk→ WPPilot  19:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Blacknclick (talk) 09:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Eristalinus June 2014-1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 01:18:00 (UTC)

Reason

High quality scan of this interesting painting, which has a great article to support it. Science can be so cruel...

Articles in which this image appears

An Experiment on a Bird in the Air Pump +10

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Joseph Wright of Derby

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - What a coincidence that I was thinking about this painting earlier. Forgot its name but not the painting. If I did I would've nominated it myself. Real fine looking piece of work. GamerPro64 02:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support I was under impression it's already featured. The philosopher looks like Isaac Newton, while the guy to the right reminds Ben Franklin. Brandmeister^talk 13:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  The article about the painting is featured. – Editør (talk) 08:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Yep, perhaps that's why. Brandmeister^talk 08:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - Hafspajen (talk) 14:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - One of my fave paintings of all time; I'm jealous I didn't nom first! - SchroCat (talk) 22:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Great painting, great quality reproduction. mustermark 18:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:An Experiment on a Bird in an Air Pump by Joseph Wright of Derby, 1768.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 02:45:00 (UTC)

Reason

Good Quality

Articles in which this image appears

Saint-Gaudens double eagle Liberty Head double eagle

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Currency

Creator

Coin: Augustus Saint-Gaudens (as modified by Charles Barber)
Image by Lost Dutchman Rare Coins
Uploaded By:Crisco 1492

• Support as nominator – National Names 2000 (talk) 02:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - A fine photo, well framed, well in focus, of a century-old goid coin that is a genuine piece of American coinage history. Photo currently used in 2 Wikipedia articles. Jusdafax 03:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This should have been promoted as a set, obverse + reverse for better EV. Brandmeister^talk 12:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Reluctant Oppose - Half the object is missing... (I think a single image with the obverse and reverse is preferable) but more importantly there are distracting scratch marks on the transparent holder and the stars around the edge go in and out of focus.--Godot13 (talk) 13:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There are lots of minute rectangular artifacts surrounding the periphery of the coin, a left over of background cleaning. Perhaps they may be cleared? --Fauzan^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 14:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Fauzan, are you looking at full size or thumbnail? If thumbnail, that's unavoidable JPG artefacting, owing to how the Wikipedia algorithms downsample images when creating thumbnails. We should be judging images at full size, per the header at the top. (The cut out used the simple "circle crop" function of GIMP; there should be absolutely no leftovers).23:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

• I was looking at full size. Though I am no expert, it was just an observation. It seems that the crop was done by repeatedly removing rectangles from the periphery. You can easily observe it by opening the image in paint and filling the background with black color. --Fauzan^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 01:24, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Those are definitely JPG artefacts. But why is your crop of such small resolution? If you made it from the original, that shouldn't be an issue. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Well, I'm not an expert on images, so I'll leave supporting and opposing to the people who are. I will say that I don't think this image quite reaches the same level as the Saint-Gaudens double eagle that is already an FP (File:Specimen1Obv.jpg). From what I know about photography, which is very little, I would say that this one is slightly out of focus at the top, and there also appears to be a haze about the coin which mutes the color.-RHM22 (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 07:17:19 (UTC)

• 
  Original – The Adoration of the Kings (1564) by Pieter Bruegel the Elder; A rather unusual take of the Adoration from PBeE. Many of those surrounding Christ—including the Three Kings—are caricatured slightly or shown as a grotesque, and the Virgin is shown naturally and not idealised. The viewpoint is from a slightly elevated position, which has the effect of focussing attention on the Christ figure in the Virgin's lap, which is shown in the exact centre of the painting.
• 
  ALT 1: Cropped slightly to remove the frame

Reason

Excellent scan of a superb picture

Articles in which this image appears

The Adoration of the Kings (Bruegel) + 1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Pieter Bruegel the Elder

• Support as nominator – SchroCat (talk) 07:17, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Frame should be cropped out. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Argh! Forgot about that. ALT 1 showing cropped version is now uploaded. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 14:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support cropped version. Nice. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support cropped version. Hafspajen (talk) 06:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support cropped version. Nice painting. !__Alborzagros (talk) 09:34, 8 April 2015 (UTC)__![reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Anbetung der Könige (Bruegel, 1564) – cropped.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 14:11:34 (UTC)

Reason

Highly encyclopaedic and good quality depiction of an unusual instrument, which has been illustrating various articles (here and in other wikis) for a long time. It was nominated in May 2013 and failed for half a vote: here

Articles in which this image appears

Stereoscope, Stereoscopy, Carl Zeiss AG

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Others

Creator

Alvesgaspar (talk)

• Support as nominator – Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Resolution issue is still present. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes but somehow mitigated by the age of the photo (and of the camera) and by the closeness to the minimum length of 1500. In fact the total numer of pixels is larger than 1500 X 1500. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:43, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Fair points, and enough for me. Support. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - EV. Bammesk (talk) 01:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - The case hasn't been made that the pocket stereoscope is rare enough to justify an exception. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 12:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 15:19:00 (UTC)

Reason

A super quality picture with a good EV

Articles in which this image appears

Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors

Creator

Benison

• Support as nominator – -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Nice photo. I like the reflections and the lack of people in the foreground. Sharp and crisp..talk→ WPPilot  19:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - I find the darkness of the interior subtracts from the EV. Taken another time with less strong sunlight coming through the windows would have been fine. mustermark 18:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Substandard lighting. Totally empty, generic-looking interior lacks informational EV. Sca (talk) 13:30, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - low EV. Does not provide a good overview of the space, neither of any particular details. Is not clear from the image where the main entry is, or anything else significant. --ELEKHH^T 15:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 17:53:18 (UTC)

Reason

Very slightly undersized, but also rather unrepresented, which I think makes up for it. Sudanese architecture is gorgeous and relatively unique.

Articles in which this image appears

Larabanga Mosque, Sudano-Sahelian architecture, Ghana's material cultural heritage

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Sathyan Velumani

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:53, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Composition leaves much to be desired (a bit more to the bottom and the right, for starters). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:45, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. It's a shame that this shot isn't slightly wider all round, but for me there are sufficient positive aspects to overcome this objection. 109.153.245.106 (talk) 21:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Unusual, ergo educational EV. Sca (talk) 15:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - while it has minor compositional shortcomings as pointed out by Crisco, given the massive under-representation of Africa, its overall EV is very high. --ELEKHH^T 15:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 15:37, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose I agree that its underrepresented however it wouldn't be difficult to vastly improve on this photo. Composition is poor, and actually I think it could be lit better. Seddon ^talk 11:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Larabanga Mosque Ghana.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:54, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 18:44:44 (UTC)

Reason

1904 The Miners Hospital was built for $5,000 raised by Park City locals and the Western Federation of Miners. Six thousand miners are treated for “Miner’s Con”, or silicosis, in the first year. Nice photo of historic location

Articles in which this image appears

Park City, Utah

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

--talk→ WPPilot  18:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support as nominator – talk→ WPPilot  18:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Building is in the shadows. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – This structure isn't representative of Park City (I've been there) as a whole and has little EV. Sca (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - @Sca: I once lived in Park City, for a year and I would have to disagree. It was always the "Historic" building in the town and today serves as a location for the Community Center. Here talk→ WPPilot  05:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I see. Well, if you lived there, I'll defer to you – even tho I agree with Crisco that it's not the best technically. Sca (talk) 13:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Sadly the sun raises behind the building and during this time of year, it sets over the ridge, so the front never really sees sunshine till about mid winter.talk→ WPPilot  14:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:47, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 18:56:13 (UTC)

Reason

Perfect photo of this former military base located in Hollister California. This is one of the airports that I flew out of as a student pilot, 25 years ago.

Articles in which this image appears

Hollister Municipal Airport - Hollister, California - San Benito County, California

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban

Creator

--talk→ WPPilot  18:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support as nominator – talk→ WPPilot  18:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Very useful. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Do you know what the blue is? Some kind of crop with blue flowers? It would be interesting to add that information to the caption if it is available. 109.153.245.106 (talk) 20:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - I lived here a long long time ago and remember the flowers as being one of the crops that fed the cattle in the area, but I really have no idea. I will reach out to a friend. talk→ WPPilot  04:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Comment – Subject of little EV. Composition unexceptional. Sca (talk) 15:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• How does an image of an airport have little EV in that airport's article? WP:FP? requires the image have EV in the article, and not that the article meet some random extra notability guideline. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• (Delayed) – It's a general aviation field, not a scheduled airline stop; thus the subject would seem to me to have have little importance transportation-wise. OK, pic has EV for the article, which however won't be read by many. But whatever. Sca (talk) 13:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @Sca: It has been added to the main page on the city of Hollister as well as the county page. I hope that overcomes your concerns. Thanks. talk→ WPPilot  06:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Please note that I withdrew my oppose vote ystdy. Sca (talk) 14:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Support I dissagree Sca - not sure what definition of EV you have, but to me this shows perfectly the layout, number of runways, proximity to other urban areas (in this case mostly agricultural), even (just about given the lack of focus) the types of planes that use it, based on the planes on the apron in front of the main hangars... There's even a single prop plane taking off towards the end of the runway... What else could you want from EV?! EV and importance are not the same... As for my weak support, I love it, but the clarity just isn't there sorry - whether this be due to motion blur, engine resonance of the mode of transport being used, or just not quite good enough camera/settings... Shame, but I find the EV high enough to just about support... gazhiley 13:05, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I must be visually impaired – I don't see the plane, even at full res.
  Oh! There it is, heading leftward – but even at full res it's just tiny. Sca (talk) 13:20, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• yeah it's very tiny! I love plane spotting in these sorts of pictures (No I don't hang around at airports it's just in these sort of pictures!) so always look closely... Google Earth is fun for that sort of activity too... gazhiley 10:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]

• Thank you all for the comments. I have been working in a different plane then I normally fly, it is a pressurized Pilatus PC-12 that, due to the pressurization requirements has super thick windows in the cockpit. Often these windshields turn into yet another lens, and have a light amount of tinting built in, arrgggg. I am trying to deal with it but using my Nikon looks to be mandatory and the little Leica I have done this last set with is struggling. I have a flight tomorrow and plan to use my Nikon and some big glass but this is a ever evolving process, and I do thank all of you for your comments as it does serve to improve my work. @Gazhiley:, thank you for the support.. talk→ WPPilot  06:25, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• BTW, as you can see here, the windshield is tinted (green) in the cockpit to protect the pilots from UV light on high altitude operations. It has become tough to overcome this and I am open to any suggestions, I am considering a new plane in the near future [2], that would address any quality concerns. The current nomination photo was taken from around 12,000 feet of altitude inbound to San Jose. talk→ WPPilot  06:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support as the image has a good EV and plus a good depiction. -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 05:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak support Camera is a bit less than ideal at the necessary shutter speed, but I think the rarity overcomes this. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 12:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hollister Municipal Airport photo D Ramey Logan.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:57, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 20:10:49 (UTC)

Reason

Wonderful photo of famous ski resorts top peak you can see three skier's on the way down one of the toughest runs on the resort.

Articles in which this image appears

Snowbird, Utah

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

--talk→ WPPilot  20:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support as nominator – talk→ WPPilot  20:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I think this picture gets a whole lot more interesting when you realise that there are tiny skiing figures on the slope. Trouble is, it's easy to miss these, especially at the small size in the article. Perhaps the caption could highlight this aspect. Also -- and probably I am being too demanding -- it's a shame it isn't just a little sharper. 109.153.245.106 (talk) 20:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Not sure if its your camera WPPilot or a setting you use, but once again I find myself dissapointed at the level of clarity and detail in this picture, compared to other pictures nominated here... lovely looking at thumb level, but really blurred when you click on the picture... Sorry... gazhiley 12:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2015 at 23:33:51 (UTC)

Reason

High quality scan of a notable artwork.

Articles in which this image appears

Madonna of Loreto (Raphael) +1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Raphael

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Hafspajen (talk) 18:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – good quality scan of interesting painting backed up a very reasonable article to provide EV. SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 12:54, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Raphaël - La Madone de Lorette - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2015 at 07:25:26 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Ceramic glaze, Earthenware, Qajar art, Pottery and Tile

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others

Creator

Owji

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Crisp quality. Qajar ceramics at its best. Étienne Dolet (talk) 17:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Hafspajen (talk) 15:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - @Alborzagros - the nomination is incomplete: missing category and image creator. The caption provides barely enough information and says nothing about the potential EV of the object. With this information I would be inclined to support...--Godot13 (talk) 23:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:20, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Added missing information after closure. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2015 at 08:16:24 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Fort de Bois l'Abbé, Caponier, Barrel vault

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors

Creator

ComputerHotline

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 08:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional support so long as the image remains in Caponier — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - add that to more articles. Hafspajen (talk) 11:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Could you please tell me some examples? I will add it to them. thanks Alborzagros (talk) 13:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I meant that added it to Barrel vault, but I guess more places could use it, Stonework maybe? Or the Wall article? Also Stone carving, section Stone shaping and tools. Very nice distinct pattern on those walls. Hafspajen (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:31, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Not enough support for promotion. --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:31, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2015 at 07:42:35 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Pampus

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Johan Bakker

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 07:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Great encyclopedic shot. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per Crisco. A tighter crop might be worth experimenting with though. Nick-D (talk) 11:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Hafspajen (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Clarity is good, and as far as EV goes I instantly gravitated to the article it is in to find out about it - thus ticks my box there... gazhiley 12:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:526452-Fort Pampus.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2015 at 08:32:22 (UTC)

Reason

EV + HQ

Articles in which this image appears

Fête de la Concorde, Champ de Mars, Pierre-Victor Galland

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others

Creator

Pierre-Victor Galland

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 08:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Wish the main article was better developed, but it looks notable. Good image. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Adam's got a good point. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - useful. Hafspajen (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose A badly-done crop. One may use {{CSS image crop}} in articles; there is no excuse for cropping captions anymore on the image itself. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 12:26, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2015 at 10:30:55 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Auguste de Beauharnais

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility

Creator

G.Dury

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Blown-out highlights. --Janke | Talk 15:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Janke. The people at Google appear to have cooked this one a bit too much. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2015 at 10:49:20 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Gabrielle Cot, William-Adolphe Bouguereau (recently added), Pierre Auguste Cot

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

William-Adolphe Bouguereau

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 10:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - We've got tons of Bouguereau already, including several paintings which have their own articles. This doesn't have the necessary EV. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – A pleasant likeness, but I don't see anything particularly notable about it. (If we're going to have more Bouguereau, it should be something more representative (which probably means one of his numerous nudes). Sca (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - well, it's his daughter. But do we have a category artist's ... lovers, wifes and such? Hafspajen (talk) 13:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Cot's daughter, not Bouguereau's. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• ^{Yeah. Cot's daughter.} Hafspajen (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - because I was thinking - why not. I was now looking at this painting and I think it is a good painting. Bouguereau's nudes are great, and I want more of them. It is one of his not to many portraits, and it has EV in Pierre Auguste Cot. I am not sure we have tons of Bouguereau's either. We have two, File:William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - The Wave (1896).jpg and File:Bouguereau-Linnocence.jpg. Crisco 1492, am I missing something? Hafspajen (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, that one too, that makes three of him. File:William Bouguereau - Dante and Virgile - Google Art Project 2.jpgHafspajen (talk) 16:18, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• He was not much for painting portaits, Bouguereau, actually. Hafspajen (talk) 16:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Is three FPs (two of which have articles) not enough to say "We can show his style pretty well". If the painting had its own article, or Cot's daughter had her own article, I'd change my mind... but if the only EV is "Bouguereau's style!", then we've got that covered. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Groan. I guess I have to write an article on Cot's daughter too. Hafspajen (talk) 06:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Crisco 1492, there was an article on her, it is a blue link, can you show me what was in it? There was text in it too. Hafspajen (talk) 06:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Nothing, it was created as a redirect. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, User:Hafspajen/ Gabrielle Cot .... Hafspajen (talk) 17:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Now that there's an article on the painting. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Charming painting, good scan with EV now provided by short article. SagaciousPhil - Chat 06:20, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 21:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:William-Adolphe Bouguereau - Gabrielle Cot - Sotheby's.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2015 at 11:19:58 (UTC)

Reason

EV + HQ

Articles in which this image appears

Willem van de Velde the Younger

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Willem van de Velde the Younger

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 11:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Reasonably interesting 17th C. nautical scene, moderate EV.

Note: Dutch title is Hollandse schepen op een kalme zee – "Dutch ships on a calm sea." Suggest adding word "sea" to title, changing "in" to "on."

Sca (talk) 13:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Lots of lovely details. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 12:29, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Willem van de Velde II - Dutch men-o'-war and other shipping in a calm.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2015 at 11:34:42 (UTC)

Reason

EV + HQ

Articles in which this image appears

Mir Castle Complex

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Вадзім Новикаў

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 11:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Foreground is distracting. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Other than cutting the grass, how would you eliminate it in order to get this shot of the castle? Don't you think this is a good shot of the castle? It gets all the parts of it into one picture, and it's quite clear. CorinneSD (talk) 03:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• You move about a meter forward, then you make a panoramic image. It's really simple. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Crisco, thank you for explaining how a better photo could be taken. I'm puzzled, though. Do featured pictures have to be nearly perfect photos – the kind that would win first, second, and third prize in photo contests – or can they just be really good photos such as this one? - CorinneSD (talk) 01:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Not necessarily "nearly perfect", but they should show the subject well. For me, at least, having part of the foreground covered in foliage is distracting. The Commons nomination had some people bring it up too, though not to the point of opposing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I didn't even know images went through a similar process on Commons. Must all images that are now on Commons be promoted as featured pictures? Also, if they are approved for featured picture status on Commons, why do they have to be approved on WP? - CorinneSD (talk) 01:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]

• No CorinneSD, two very different processes. Quite often those that pass on Commons end up here, but the criteria is different, so not all pass... But it's a good place to look as they tend to go there first, so a lot of discussion has taken place... But they do need to be approved here seperatly due to the different purposes of each "forum"... Does that help? gazhiley 12:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]
• Or come here first, then go there. In terms of technical demands, Commons is sometimes the more challenging, but what gets a lot of supports on Commons may not get any support here if it's not used well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you both for your comments and explanations. If I understand correctly, how the image is used in articles in WP, that is, how they contribute to our understanding of a subject – encyclopedic value – is very important here, and more important than on Commons. CorinneSD (talk) 15:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]

• Tis my understanding yes... Commons seems to be more about the technical quality than anything else, whereas FP is more about whether or not there is a place for it in an Encyclopedia, and if it is the highest standard picture we can get of that subject... gazhiley 15:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]

• Oppose Agree with Crisco. Alternative to moving forward and doing a panorama, the photographer could just take a slightly higher picture... Off the back of a car, or on a stepladder or the suchlike... gazhiley 12:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Per Crisco. Sca (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2015 at 17:55:25 (UTC)

Reason

Great scan of excellent picture

Articles in which this image appears

Gaudentius of Brescia, Romanino

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Religious figures

Creator

Girolamo Romanino

• Support as nominator – SchroCat (talk) 17:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – He looks weighed down by a lot of responsibility. ^{Just wondering: do you think the original colors were brighter? It looks a little dull now.} – CorinneSD (talk) 19:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. This is not a painting by Gaudiosus of Naples- it's a painting of Gaudiousus of Naples. More precisely, it's what someone who lived centuries after his death imagined he would look like. This is not at all useful as a likeness, which is how it is currently used. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• The history of Western portrait art can be pretty much summed up by Blackadder, "painted to a romantic ideal rather than the true depiction of the idiosyncratic facial qualities of the person in question", so we could question many of the portraits that end up featured. Everything with Christ in, for example... – SchroCat (talk) 22:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I think you have missed my point. This image is not being used as a reproduction of a painting or an example of a particular style of artwork (as any FP featuring Christ will be) but as an illustration of Gaudiosus. Were this image being used to illustrate an article about Renaissance views of historical bishops, or as an example of a painter's work/style, or in an article about the painting itself we would not be having this conversation. As it is, the image is being used apparently simply as a likeness for the subject, and, for that, it is ill-suited. Josh Milburn (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment But nobody knows how Hamlet, Ophelia, Jesus, Nicodemus, Augustinus, St. Peter, or even Robin Hood looked - and still they are depicted. This guy is from the 5th century... It is impossible to ask for a real likeness. I really can't notice any point in this opposition. The art of depiction in the 5th century - was not in such state that it would have been any good for depicting any real likeness. Hafspajen (talk) 01:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Other guys from that period were: Augustine of Hippo - nobody has the faintest idea how he looked, really. Hypatia - same there, and all the rest from that period, Saint Patrick, Pelagius, Attila the Hun ... we just don't KNOW how they looked. And still we depict them... And use them in articles. Hafspajen (talk) 01:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Also. Even if even if Romanino's article (Girolamo Romani (c. 1485 – c. 1566) - currently is badly illustrated, he is a rather well known Italian High Renaissance painter - and he is good. The above reasoning could have possibly occurred if somebody asked for featuring a Bible-card or random Bible illustration, but Romanino, who is an artist of his own right. You don't get the Interpol to go find a stolen painting if it is not an important artist's painting. Hafspajen (talk) 01:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm slightly mystified by this response. No, we don't know what Hamlet looked like, and no, I wouldn't support promoting a painting of him presented as a likeness, either. And yes, we do use "likenesses" in these articles (though it's an open question as to whether we should- I think I recall Ealdgyth getting annoyed about this at one point) but "we use type x pictures in articles" is very different from "we should be promoting type x pictures to FP status". I remain unconvinced about the EV of this image. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, I get annoyed when folks use non-contemporary images for medieval (or earlier) subjects - especially (as in this case) when it's not made clear that it is not at all contemporary. There is no caption in the biography article - which is misleading the readers. Quite honestly, it should be removed from that article - as it's not at all useful. We'd be better off running a cartoon image ... that way readers wouldn't assume that the depiction is accurate, which they probably do now given there is no disclaimer. I see it was added just on 7 April 2015. I was tempted to remove it, but instead put in a caption. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• And I am not with you two here. The painting is in the church, on the high altar, where he was a bishop, in the very church, where he is buried in Brescia. He was an Italan bishop. It is also an artwork of a well know artist.Hafspajen (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• You're not getting the point ... it's not about whether or not it is supposed to depict the subject of the article. It is that it was placed in the article with no caption pointing out that it is not at all likeness of the individual. Without that context, it's misleading. And it's just a pretty decoration without any real accuracy - the vestments depicted would not be correct for the actual period that the person was bishop. Historical writing has gotten away from using non-contemporary depictions for medieval and ancient subjects because it gives the wrong impression. The work was painted 1000 years AFTER the bishop lived. There is no way it can be considered historically accurate and not making that clear to the readers is being misleading. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry, but You're not getting the point ... This is not photography, but art history. Are you familiar with art, art history and such? Nobody would ever start considering an artwork like this historically accurate. Nobody ever said it was either. Hafspajen (talk) 12:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not objecting to it's use in the article on the painter or in an article on the town or church. But using it on the article about the bishop turns it into history, not art history. It really does not belong in the bishop's article, but at the very least it should have a good caption that explains that it's not contemporary. When this FPC was started ... the bishop's article did not have that. I'm hoping that all future such uses will have the proper context given - that's my point. Or better yet, don't place a non-contemporary image into a medieval or ancient history biography article just for decorative purposes. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I think it can very well illustrate the article, as you did, adding: 16th century depiction. Hafspajen (talk) 13:55, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Also there is a wast amount of artwork on different themes that is part of our cultural human heritage, and it only shows that the theme they are illustrating is interesting, is a living, actual theme - that preoccupies people and they are still keep on depicting it, adding additional information and things that comes from them, from their time. It is certainly not a reason to oppose a nomination. Hafspajen (talk) 14:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• No one is opposing this nomination because there is "a [vast] amount of artwork on different themes". Josh Milburn (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• One can't really judge artwork like this, if they are depicting enough likeness or not. How about Picasso, Mondrian, Matisse? Those artist's works bear with almost no likeness with depicted persons or even objects. One have to be careful about what criteria is risen. Art is not really about photographic likeness at all. Hafspajen (talk) 10:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Hafspajen, I think that's a little patronising. I agree fully with Ealdgyth. The picture is in use in a biography, not an article about art history. I am not going to judge it for its contribution to art history, but nor am I going to judge it as a photograph. I'm going to judge its effectiveness as a portrait of a real person. How are you judging it? Because, as far as I can see, it doesn't have much to do with how it's actually used, and that's what we're meant to be judging. Also (and I'm disengaging after this- if you still don't get it, I give up), "Nobody would ever start considering an artwork like this historically accurate. Nobody ever said it was either." I disagree. A lot of people are going to assume at a glance that this is historically accurate, and when it's placed in the lead in the way that it was (and, arguably, the way it now is), it is presented as historically accurate. Josh Milburn (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - also, fixed his article. (Romanino's *) Hafspajen (talk) 02:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Sorry, but as either art or portraiture, strikes me as bland, humdrum. Granted, it's 16th C., but still.... Sca (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Hm. Have you looked closely? Great brushwork, though. Hafspajen (talk) 01:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Maybe it needs cleaning? Sca (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2015 at 23:45:48 (UTC)

Reason

High quality sports picture; a nice action shot.

Articles in which this image appears

Yacine Brahimi

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Sport

Creator

Clément Bucco-Lechat

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:45, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - useful... Hafspajen (talk) 06:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Blacknclick (talk) 09:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Sorry, at first glance I can't tell which of the two players is Yacine Brahimi. The places the EV into question. Étienne Dolet (talk) 03:58, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • This image is not to identify him (there's a lead image that does that), but to show him in action. If one's already seen the lead image, it's rather hard to mistake him for Taron Voskanyan. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crisco 1492, but this photograph has a chance of going on the main page. What happens then? Étienne Dolet (talk) 05:05, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• There is always a description following - on can say, he in the green equipment. Hafspajen (talk) 10:56, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Or, as done here: "right". Simple. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:30, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, images are not supposed to be judged based on their encyclopedic value on the main page, but in the articles in which they are used. See WP:FP? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FP? makes it clear: Its main subject is in focus, it has good composition and has no highly distracting or obstructing elements. I happen to find Taron Voskanyan the distracting element in this photograph. Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, what now. I don't realy find Taron Voskanyan distracting ... The are rater well coordinated. Hafspajen (talk) 20:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with Haffy. If one is on the attack in football, are we to expect nobody to try and defend? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - EV + HQ Alborzagros (talk) 05:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support I have to agree with Crisco 1492 here - having the other player in shot trying to tackle him only adds to the picture for me - more natural setting... gazhiley 15:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support This is a striking and professional quality sports photo with excellent EV Nick-D (talk) 11:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - Yacine Brahimi (Alg) face à Taron Voskanyan (Arm).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:46, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2015 at 04:32:59 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Evert Collier

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Evert Collier

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 04:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Please disambiguate the Collier link. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

done_Alborzagros (talk) 07:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak support - Looks to have okay EV for the artist's article, but considering how many high quality scans of paintings out there, 1500px is a bit small. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:49, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - it is a nice painting. Interesting with the different scripts. Hafspajen (talk) 12:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:29, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2015 at 04:48:08 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Jan Abrahamsz Beerstraaten + Battle of Scheveningen (RECENTLY ADDED)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War

Creator

Jan Abrahamsz Beerstraaten

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 04:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional support - if this image replaces File:Beerstraaten, Battle of Scheveningen.jpg in usage. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done-Alborzagros (talk) 07:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -Hafspajen (talk) 09:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – SchroCat (talk) 21:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Category?--Godot13 (talk) 00:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Busy. Sca (talk) 12:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Battle of Scheveningen (Slag bij Ter Heijde)(Jan Abrahamsz. Beerstraten).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2015 at 05:47:45 (UTC)

Reason

High quality isometric picture

Articles in which this image appears

Tomb of Safdarjung

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Anthropoligist

• Support as nominator – RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 05:47, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Overexposed. Blown highlights throughout the sky. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Interesting architecture, but I'm not wild about the corner-centered isometric view. Sca (talk) 13:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The extreme perspective spoils it for me. 109.153.245.106 (talk) 20:45, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^{Yes, this viewpoint, combined with the structure's size, seems to exaggerate the perspective recession. Sca (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

• Oppose Heavy distortion. Yann (talk) 12:50, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2015 at 07:15:56 (UTC)

Reason

High resolution, good quality picture with high EV of an Amur leopard showing the entire body; being critically endangered, captive pictures are often the best available.

Articles in which this image appears

Amur leopard

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals

Creator

William Warby

• Support as nominator – —Bruce1ee^talk 07:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Beautiful animal, but to my eye backlighting in this view impairs contrast with background. Sca (talk) 13:31, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: Fylbecatulous talk 22:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Something seems wrong with this photo. The animal looks sharp, but the background is awfully blurry. Did someone Photoshop the animal into this scene, or is there some photography technique that would allow a photographer to get a sharp main subject while having the background look so bad? This isn't bokeh, it's just plain bad. --Pine^✉ 02:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  This picture is part of a series taken by the photographer at Colchester Zoo here. I see no evidence of digital manipulation. —Bruce1ee^talk 04:57, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Bruce1ee, I like the set but that background of this particular image I find too distracting at full res, even if it's not manipulated. Some of those other images might be good Commons FPCs. --Pine^✉ 06:50, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose I agree with Pine. Distracting background and to be honest the lighting isn't particularly great. Seddon ^talk 10:47, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted -- — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:29, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2015 at 13:43:22 (UTC)

Reason

Good scan, own article. EV + dramatic, masterful depiction by a good artist. Andromeda's stupid, arrogant and evil mother was showing off and claiming she was more beautiful than the sea nymphs. Their father, the God of sea, has decided to send a sea monster to haunt her kingdom as a divine punishment for her pomposity. The Queen and King then decided to sacrifice their daughter - instead of saying sorry, I was an idiot. Andromeda was tied by the sea at the rocks, in chains, to be murdered by the monster.

Articles in which this image appears

Perseus and Andromeda (Leighton) - Andromeda (mythology), Frederic Leighton, 1st Baron Leighton, Walker Art Gallery

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Lord Frederic Leighton

• Support as nominator – Hafspajen (talk) 13:43, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Wowish, never seen this before. Brandmeister^talk 18:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Very nice image. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - No need to say why, because reasons are clear. As Persians (Persian: ناگفته پیداست) say «That is shown without saying». Alborzagros (talk) 14:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• - Hafspajen (talk) 21:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support-Great image!--Godot13 (talk) 22:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support New one for me...and such detail.--Mark Miller (talk) 09:25, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 12:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Frederic, Lord Leighton - Perseus and Andromeda - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2015 at 17:52:41 (UTC)

Reason

One of the good photograph available out of very few. Quality and the framing is good. A bit noisy but still I feel its meeting Wiki FP criteria. Moreover, it is very difficult to get the Judge's photos since they are very limited to public functions. Apart from all these, Judicial Head of the Country will have tight security, therefore it will be noway possible to take a close up shot like this unless the photographer is representing a media or an official shoot. I think, the reasoning will be considered while voting.

Articles in which this image appears

H. L. Dattu, Chief Justice of India

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People

Creator

Prathyush Thomas

• Support as nominator – Blacknclick (talk) 17:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Subject's face looks OOF; artificial background is distracting. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:46, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Looking at his left ear and shoulder, it looks like he's been cut out. And I wouldn't go for that background colour either. mustermark 18:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It not artificial background. Something was written over there, I have removed it but did not change the background color. Blacknclick (talk) 07:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - background noise, cropping issues (unless his left ear is naturally deformed), soft focus on his face, mustache and hair out of focus, and a problematic background color. Sorry...--Godot13 (talk) 00:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Garish background does not comport with subject's high position in Indian justice system (although it complements his tie!). Sca (talk) 12:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2015 at 23:42:09 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image, very attractive and encyclopedic

Articles in which this image appears

Baturraden

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

Chris Woodrich

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:42, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Godhulii 1985 (talk) 15:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Support Stunning colours, but depth of focus isn't great - a lot of blur or noisy edges... But not enough for me to oppose... gazhiley 12:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]
  • Where do you see blur? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]
    • Maybe blur is a strong word... Lack of detail maybe - very soft... Can't see as much detail as I'd expect from a picture this size... I agree the saturation could be knocked down a bit - that may be part of the issue... Only minor issue anyway, hence still supporting... gazhiley 15:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Changing my vote to full Support as new version seems to have made the picture clearer - maybe my eyes were not coping with the brightness before! gazhiley 14:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment It looks oversaturated to me. - Blieusong (talk) 07:26, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Saturation is actually down by five, but I can drop it further if everyone agrees. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support- great colors (but I wouldn't mind seeing the saturation slightly tweaked).--Godot13 (talk) 04:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • If my internet at home gets fixed I'll do it. It up and went kaput yesterday. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Wikimania 2017 should be here. --Pine^✉ 02:20, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The internet connection would be a deal breaker, sadly. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Baturraden overview from ridge, Purwokerto, 2015-03-23.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:47, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Added to Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:47, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2015 at 06:08:55 (UTC)

Reason

EV + HQ

Articles in which this image appears

Yosemite National Park and Glacier Point

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama

Creator

Ðiliff

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 06:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support WOW. Amazing clarity... Excellent... Alborzagros please update the title, reason field and Catagory when you get a chance please. gazhiley 12:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support A fine image. If I was being picky though I'd say that there's a visible fringe running the length of the skyline which it wouldn't hurt to remove. mustermark 18:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 22:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Stunning ---Godot13 (talk) 22:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Hafspajen (talk) 06:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Yes...please.--Mark Miller (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Glacier Point at Sunset, Yosemite NP, CA, US - Diliff.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:48, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2015 at 06:39:57 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Ofotfjord and Herjangsfjord

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama

Creator

Ximonic

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 06:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Love glorious Norwegian fjord scenery, but something about this shot underwhelms. The unremarkable autumnal foreground is prominent, while the stupendous mtn. background is only hazily visible under lowering skies in the distance. Sca (talk) 13:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Why autumnal foreground is unremarkable? It gives the picture more beauty. Alborzagros (talk) 14:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• ^{Golden autumnal trees are pretty but could be anywhere. Sca (talk) 21:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

• You can see Golden autumnal trees anywhere but these trees give the picture more beauty next to mountain in the back.Alborzagros (talk) 06:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -Jobas (talk) 22:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Although the creator has done a fine job of removing fringes, there is still work to be done in terms of IQ. Specifically my problem is the large amount of noise in the sky. I am not sure why there is so much noise at ISO 100 on a fairly decent camera. mustermark 18:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Usually postprocessing, to save highlights. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment-Category? --Godot13 (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 12:47, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2015 at 07:01:06 (UTC)

Reason

EV + HQ

Articles in which this image appears

Papilio demodocus

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

William Warby

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 07:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the nom. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 22:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Blacknclick (talk) 09:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Category? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godot13 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 10 April 2015 UTC

• I've added it. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:18, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support--Godot13 (talk) 04:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Papilio demodocus larva Stratford Butterfly Farm (1).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:03, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2015 at 13:50:22 (UTC)

Reason

EV + HQ

Articles in which this image appears

Mungo Park (explorer)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Literary illustrations

Creator

N/A

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 13:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – I'm torn. Some historical interest & EV; OTOH, some of our English-WP readers be put off by the German text – and Mungo Park wasn't German. (I say this even tho I know German.) Sca (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Opps, Mungo Park ( 1771 – 1806) was a Scottish explorer of the African continent. Was he eaten? lost? Hafspajen (talk) 17:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment-Category, creator?--Godot13 (talk) 00:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Who's the actual author? If it's by Mungo Park himself, that ups the EV a lot more than if it's a simple text that includes him (and may not be illustrating him on the cover). Bit on the small side, but, given it seems to capture the detail well, I can overlook that. Frankly, I think it'd have far higher encyclopedic value (EV) if we had any information about the book: At the moment, the claim to EV is that it mentions Mungo Park in the text on the cover - not a very high claim, when we don't know much about the significance of the book. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 15:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• The book was written by Eduard Schauenburg, BTW. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2015 at 13:54:54 (UTC)

Reason

Excellent scan of a superb painting

Articles in which this image appears

The Trinity and Mystic Pietà, Hans Baldung

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Hans Baldung

• Support as nominator – SchroCat (talk) 13:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - great artwork. Hafspajen (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -Jobas (talk) 22:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Great scan! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support yup, excellent image.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hans Baldung Grien - The Trinity and Mystic Pietà - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:55, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2015 at 10:00:37 (UTC)

Reason

A quality image with a good EV

Articles in which this image appears

NH 28

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban

Creator

Benison

• Support as nominator – -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 10:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose No EV and quality. the picture is too dark too be FP.-Alborzagros (talk) 10:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)-[reply]

 Done Fixed lighting and shades. With EV, I can't see why you said so? Its used in the article and demonstrate the article clearly. -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 10:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose – Per Alborzagros. Could be almost anywhere. Sca (talk) 13:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. I like the composition, but the image is incredibly hazy/grainy. I also agree with Sca that this could be anywhere- is there not some way that the "character" of the road could be better illustrated? Josh Milburn (talk) 16:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted ---The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 16:17, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Nom withdrawn...snow close, I presume..;) -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 16:17, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2015 at 00:00:30 (UTC)

Reason

Tizian mature style characterized by the use of broad brushwork and brilliant colours.

Articles in which this image appears

The Entombment (Titian, 1559) +3

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Titian

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Great painting. Alborzagros (talk) 06:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - ... I think that article could be a bit better though... ^{(never mind, fixed it)}Hafspajen (talk) 07:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – SchroCat (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• SUPPORT AT THE ELEVENTH HOUR.-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 18:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Entierro de Cristo (Tiziano).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2015 at 09:10:03 (UTC)

Reason

EV + HQ

Articles in which this image appears

Self-portrait (David), Jacques-Louis David, +3 other

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Jacques-Louis David

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 09:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Sourcing needs to be cleaned up; where's this scan from? (looks like a book to me) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:56, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Nom should include Articles in which this image appears. Sca (talk) 15:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Category? --Godot13 (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Nomination is incomplete: missing article(s) in which the image appears and category. Reason and caption provide minimal if any support for EV (for example, mentioning that it is the lead image for the article on the artist would be helpful...). --Godot13 (talk) 23:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Added missing information shortly before closure. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2015 at 09:11:24 (UTC)

Reason

Excellent scan of superb painting

Articles in which this image appears

Supper at Emmaus (Caravaggio), London + 1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Caravaggio

• Support as nominator – SchroCat (talk) 09:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Too dark. Sca (talk) 15:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• That's the version as it appears at the National Gallery (i.e., it's a dark picture, with the use of chiaroscuro one of the key elements - SchroCat (talk) 15:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2015 at 09:15:34 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Julia Dujmovits

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Sport

Creator

Manfred Werner

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 09:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Blacknclick (talk) 09:51, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Negligible EV. Article is stub. Sca (talk) 15:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – the poor state of the article is neither here nor there: it can always be improved at a later date. – SchroCat (talk) 21:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• FP category for this image? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Also, oppose - the choice in background is a problem. If there weren't so many advertisements, I'd be fine with this, but the numerous logos are distracting. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:56, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Per Sca. This image shows what Ms Dujmovits looks like, which is always very useful, but doesn't have any connection with the reason for which she's notable (when I saw the photo I assumed she was a tennis player given the headband: it turns out that she's a snowboarder). The posture is also a bit awkward. Nick-D (talk) 11:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional weak support (if I'm allowed to do that). This is a great photo, for my money, though the background is a little distracting. I would quite like to see an improved article, though. Josh Milburn (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose as above, not much indication that she is a snowboarder, distracting advertising in background, and minimal EV as article is a stub. Mattximus (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. There is more indication of her profession (i.e. indication that she is a sportsperson of some kind) than is the case with many other successful nominations, which have no indication at all. I also personally find the background ads more scene-setting than distracting. 109.157.11.62 (talk) 17:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2015 at 23:52:33 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image; useful in the article; mathematics is sadly underrepresented.

Articles in which this image appears

Yitang Zhang

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering

Creator

Aynsley Floyd for the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:52, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – High-quality photo, character-full face of noted practitioner in esoteric field (Greek to me – New Yorker article looks interesting). Could be cropped from right to remove distracting ovoid reflection in background. Sca (talk) 12:30, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cloning would be a much better approach. If there is consensus for it I can it myself. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:32, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do. Sca (talk) 12:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Gone. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TNX. Sca (talk)

• Support – who knows why... Hafspajen (talk) 23:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support I agree with Sca, you can really see all the character in his face, WordSeventeen (talk) 02:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support High quality image, relaxed/natural composition.--Godot13 (talk) 23:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 15:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2015 at 05:27:44 (UTC)

Reason

Never nominated a head of state before, but the quality of this photograph is exceptional.

Articles in which this image appears

Serzh Sargsyan

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/People/Political

Creator

517design

• Support as nominator – Étienne Dolet (talk) 05:27, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Colors strike me as a little dull. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Bland official portrait of serving politician (re-elected two years ago). Doesn't add significant EV. Sca (talk) 12:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Sca: while useful, this is a boring image which doesn't have particularly strong EV Nick-D (talk) 07:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I am not judging the quality of the picture, but EV is indeed there, lead picture of the article of the president of a country ? President of Armenia, read it. Should really be enough EV. I know about Sca protesting as soon as he notices a political photo, but hey, in 100 years people might want to know about them ... I really don't think it is a criteria. 10:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC) Hafspajen (talk)

• How recently was pic added to Serzh Sargsyan? Sca (talk) 14:13, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• In regards to EV, this is a generic formal portrait of a middle-aged man wearing a suit. The only thing differentiating it from a portrait of any kind of professional is that part of the flag of Armenia is partly visible in the background, but even then it's not distinct. There's nothing that implies that the subject of the photo holds an important position, or is a successful politician. Nick-D (talk) 00:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd say a flag is a big indicator. Besides, under that logic, we'd have to delist these: File:Salman Khurshid portrait.jpg, File:Mark Rutte-6.jpg. Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Sorry Nick-D I really don't follow your logic... It is a photo of a notable person because he is a notable person... That is enough implication that it is of a notable person... We could never pass a picture of anyone if we had to somehow have evidence in the picture of who they are... Do stand up commedians now need people in their pictures of people laughing, with a speech bubble coming out of their mouth? Do racing drivers now need to have their picture taken ONLY in their race car? Do Scientists now have to have their picture taken only in laboratories mid-experiment? Vets have to be mid-laceration of a pet otherwise we don't believe that they're a vet? No, therefore to somehow prove in the picture that this is the president of the country is uneccessary if it is stated that it is the president and that he actually is the president... It is certainly NOT a generic picture as it contains the President of Armenia - I'd say that is fairly un-generic...... gazhiley 14:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree. It is a similar point to the one I made below in the case of Julia Dujmovits. 109.157.11.62 (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• It's a painfully boring photo of a notable person which gives no indication to him being notable, or why. Nick-D (talk) 11:33, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Numerous featured pictures give no indication of why the subject is notable. If that is now a criterion then many will have to be delisted. 109.157.11.62 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2015 at 23:02:02 (UTC)

Reason

Unusual Madonna by the Italian Renaissance master Antonello da Messina. The name derives from the collector George Salting, the donor who gave the painting to the National Gallery, London, in 1910. The golden crown above her head with the two angels; one wearing a red robe, the other one a green robe, with the funny wings is indicating a depiction of her as the Queen of Heaven.

Articles in which this image appears

Salting Madonna (Antonello da Messina)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Antonello da Messina

• Support as nominator – Hafspajen (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Unusual and interesting painting. CorinneSD (talk) 23:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Good scan; like how you can see the cracks. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yes, very unusual. I like it. WordSeventeen (talk) 02:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Fantastic and high quality.__Alborzagros (talk) 10:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – SchroCat (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Wow. Nice. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 12:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Antonello da messina, madonna salting.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2015 at 23:51:55 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image and interesting composition

Articles in which this image appears

Jacob Cornelisz van Oostsanen

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers

Creator

Dirck Jacobsz

• Support as co-nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as co-nominator – a very interesting painting. This is the guy who painted the Laughing Fool. Hafspajen (talk) 00:04, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - I think his painting style and technique improved. This painting is dated 1550 and The Laughing Fool is dated c. 1500. I'm confused by the caption. The artist is van Oostsanen, right? Is he painting himself painting his wife? Then what is "by Dirck Jacobsz"? Are you saying that the portrait of his wife in this painting is by another artist? Was it a separate, pre-existing painting by Jacobsz, and van Oostsanen was just copying it? If so, wow! CorinneSD (talk) 00:57, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fixed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• It is not a bit complicated. -it is (as the article states too) a painting of a son, also painter, painting his parents. (Jacobs meaning Jacob's son) Hafspajen (talk) 01:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support I agree with Hafspajen. This painting is even more intriguing because of what Hafs said. It sort of reminds me of another painting. Same sort of concept. There is a little girl sat down in front of a big television, She is watching a scary horror movie, but she watches the movie not by looking at the television screen. She has a good sized hand mirror. She only watches the movie as it appears in the mirror. She figures the monsters cannot travel into the mirror and then get to her. It is a very multi-dimensional theme much like this painting. Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 02:34, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vivid personal images coming to us across five centuries. Sca (talk) 14:08, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dirck Jacobsz - Jacob Cornelisz. van Oostsanen Painting a Portrait of His Wife - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2015 at 15:14:49 (UTC)

Reason

Strong picture of a fairly obscure species. We didn't have an article before today, though, interestingly, there were articles on four other Wikipedias.

Articles in which this image appears

Ramaria gracilis

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Fungi

Creator

H. Krisp

• Support as nominator – Josh Milburn (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support about what I'd expect from a fungus image. A less busy foreground would be desirable, but I don't see it happening. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support EV + HQ Alborzagros (talk) 13:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - High EV, but I wish these technical images would feature a scale bar, but I suppose the grass gives a reasonable reference. Mattximus (talk) 13:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - per Crisco. --Godot13 (talk) 04:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 15:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Zierliche Koralle Ramaria gracilis.JPG --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2015 at 23:37:56 (UTC)

Reason

A great and encyclopedic image. Beautiful

Articles in which this image appears

Indus River +1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama

Creator

KennyOMG

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT as well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Much of the right-half of the picture appears to be in shadow – could another be taken without cloud cover? —Bruce1ee^talk 07:51, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • No idea. You'd have to ask the photographer. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree. While it is a spectacular panorama, the extreme lighting variation looks odd (almost like two photographs taken at different times of day merged together), and rather spoils the effect. 109.157.11.62 (talk) 19:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support ALT - I think that's better. —Bruce1ee^talk 13:29, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support sharp image and personally I like the contrast. --Pine^✉ 02:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support original and ALT - Better image is possible but will be hard to come by. ALT is manipulated but I think it retains the integrity of the subject. Bammesk (talk) 02:41, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ALT Nice now. Yann (talk) 12:45, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ALT gazhiley 13:55, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ALT much more balanced feeling to it now...--Godot13 (talk) 00:44, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ALT per Yann & gazhiley. --talk→ WPPilot  12:50, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Indus Valley near Leh - alternate.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2015 at 05:48:14 (UTC)

Reason

This runway was know as 19L for almost 20 years. The polar shift caused the FAA to renumber it to align the runway in late 2014 to 20L. This is the shorter of two runways next to each other that caters to smaller private and charter aircraft

Articles in which this image appears

John Wayne Airport

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Others

Creator

WPPilot

• Support as nominator – talk→ WPPilot  05:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Off center and blurry at full size, but good angle anyway. Brandmeister^talk 20:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I could crop it square, but I left that short section on the right to show the right runway., as the the blurry comment, remember the camera is traveling at about 75mph directly at the subject, so a number of limitations (i.e. you cant setup your tripod on a skyhook) keep the amount of aperture and shutter speed, at minimums. talk→ WPPilot  01:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose as above, it is blurry, but also I'm not sure I can see the EV. It's supposed to be of John Wayne Airport, but only shows a single runway. Mattximus (talk) 22:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Please note Mattximus the nom isn't for the airport, it's specifically just for the runway... Although I really appreciate the effort and limitations caused by this type of photography, I also sadly cannot support due to the level of blur... Just too much detail lost... Cool picture though, excellent attempt... Oppose sorry... gazhiley 13:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose It's so crucial to have a runway centered in such a photograph. Étienne Dolet (talk) 08:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2015 at 21:50:20 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image of the first issue of Greenlandic krone (1874), scarce image, high EV.

Articles in which these images appear

Greenlandic krone

FP category for this image

Currency

Creator

Kingdom of Denmark for use in Greenland.
From the National Numismatic Collection, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution.
Image by Godot13.

• Support as nominator – Godot13 (talk) 21:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Question - Looks like a good scan, but isn't it missing EV if we only show one side? Mattximus (talk) 22:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mattximus- It is only printed on one side (as noted in the description).--Godot13 (talk) 22:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OOps missed that, Support Mattximus (talk) 00:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - Nice! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 15:23, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Historical EV, plus aesthetic values that knock my 'crown' (krone) off! Sca (talk) 16:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Historical EV and HQ -Alborzagros (talk) 10:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC)-[reply]

Promoted File:GRE-A37-Greenland-50 Øre (1874).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2015 at 08:02:50 (UTC)

Reason

An important figure in today's Ukrainian government. The EV is good, especially considering that the Ukrainian conflict is still ongoing.

Articles in which this image appears

Arsen Avakov, Ministry of Internal Affairs (Ukraine)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political

Creator

Виктор Г. Алексеев

• Support as nominator – Étienne Dolet (talk) 08:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Bland, official-looking portrait of serving politician & govt. official. Rather dark due to 'official'-looking pinstripey suit. Sca (talk) 16:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Unnecessarily political and may be perceived as Wikipedia taking a position on current issues. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 12:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Surely that can't be a consideration here, can it? 81.141.231.231 (talk) 21:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• In that case, then we should be delisting all political peoples as FPs. Étienne Dolet (talk) 16:45, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• That should be argued case by case (as we are now). My thinking is that the PoD/FP should be different from the "Hot News". Ukraine is as as hot as you can get right now. Why go there? It will come off as an endorsement and just invoke backlash the Admins will have to deal with. Are the FPs intentionally political? No. Should the incidental politics be considered? Oh my, yes. Nice photo. Good looking smart guy. I support Ukraine. But just no. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 17:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd agree, but Wikipedia is not censored. Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Apologies. I do not understand your point, and I presume you are not accusing anyone here of breaking not censored for expressing opinions about the possible political inclinations of certain photos. But I do wonder, how is discussion and the process of reaching consensus, automatically "censuring"? My personal (non admin) opinion is that having this photo, or one of Putin for that matter, on the main page (just now) is inherently, and unnecessarily, argumentative. I, as an editor, get one vote/recommendation and "Oppose" is how I am recommending, and the reasons for the recommendation have been fully explained, or at least I believe so. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 18:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Follow-up Comment - Will Hillary Clinton (or any other political candidate) appear on the Main Page before elections? If so, then I am dead wrong about this and will recant. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 19:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• According a picture FP status and putting it on the main page are two different things. One does not necessarily entail the other. Consideration of the sensitivity of pictures presumably takes place at the time they are selected for the main page. 86.188.80.40 (talk) 19:25, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• HullIntegrity, the IP has a point here as well. But Wikipedia has specific policies in regards to this. One of them being WP:NOTCENSORED, which makes it clear that we shouldn't edit or disapprove of anything on Wikipedia because it'll harm someone's beliefs. But, in all honesty, you may be right about the main page. After reading this: Wikipedia:NOTCENSORED and the Main Page, I think content that is deemed offensive should be excluded from the main page. But again, this doesn't mean that this photograph has to be on the main page, neither does it mean that a simple photograph such as this should offend anyone. But then again, I'm just a neutral observer. Étienne Dolet (talk) 23:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2015 at 08:20:14 (UTC)

Reason

Excellent scan of superb picture

Articles in which this image appears

Young Man with a Skull + 7

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Frans Hals

• Support as nominator – SchroCat (talk) 08:20, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Great scan! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Out of category of rudimentary paintings. Belonging to adroitly-painted works.____Alborzagros (talk) 13:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There are a lot of white dots, specially on the lower part. Yann (talk) 12:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The vast majority appear to be light reflecting off imperfections in the paint (par for the course for these types of images). A couple (the one on his chin, for instance) are so square that I wonder if they could be hot pixels, but I dare not remove them considering the issues we've had with digitally manipulated paintings before. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2015 at 10:27:13 (UTC)

Reason

After the way my internet's been acting, I need a drink. Also, it's a very nice scan of a notable painting.

Articles in which this image appears

The Plum +4

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Édouard Manet

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Looks good to me, has EV as well. Mattximus (talk) 12:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - SchroCat (talk) 15:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Manet does it again. Étienne Dolet (talk) 08:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support I'm an avid fan of this kind of works. ___Alborzagros (talk) 12:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)____[reply]
• Support – Fetching – good detail re brushwork. Sca (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- Agreeing with above. Fetching. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 17:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Edouard Manet - The Plum - National Gallery of Art.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2015 at 23:48:44 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image of a notable camera; illustrates the article perfectly.

Articles in which this image appears

Agfa Optima 1a

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment

Creator

Uwe Aranas

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support A great camera with tangible photos in 1960's. Alborzagros (talk) 12:52, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 12:56, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Per nom. Mattximus (talk) 20:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- Totally digging it. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 17:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Great photo of a classic. talk→ WPPilot  12:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Agfa-Optima-1A-01.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2015 at 09:37:49 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Crucifixion of Jesus + Wood engraving

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others

Creator

Gustave Doré

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 09:37, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose We really can't accept these cropped versions of engravings; the borders are absolutely necessary to proper reproduction. {{CSS image crop}} makes mangling the original file unnecessary. This is from his Bible, right? I own said Bible; I shall eventually get all of it scanned. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 15:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:30, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 10:53:41 (UTC)

File:Bahá'u'lláh Portrait.jpg

Reason

High quality, high EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Bahá'í Faith,`Abdu'l-Bahá

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/People/Religious_figures

Creator

unknown

• Support as nominator – Qian.neewan (talk) 10:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Interesting face despite very grainy old photo. However, I don't understand this part of text/caption — "...closed the eyes of the world." Sca (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Unless you are a 130 years old, you couldn't have possibly taken the image yourself. The sourcing of this image needs to be cleaned up, too. Also, little EV; this isn't even used in the article on the man. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - The picture is not even of Baha'u'llah, but of `Abdu'l-Baha. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 22:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Excuse me, sorry for the wrong file name.Qian.neewan (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Not just wrong file name - not a picture of the person claimed in your original caption.--Soundofmusicals (talk) 21:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• RefuseQian.neewan (talk) 06:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2015 at 15:13:59 (UTC)

Reason

Spanish-born dancer, actress and courtesan, "the most sought after woman in all of Europe" in her time. High resolution image with restoration

Articles in which this image appears

La Belle Otero

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers

Creator

Jean Reutlinger, restored and uploaded by Yann

• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 15:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Pic. is hazy in the 19th C. manner but typical of period portraits. Interesting story – a fin de siècle diva. Sca (talk) 15:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - If the original image was not B&W, we shouldn't be making it B&W. Keeping the original tone would have been much better. Also, the masking tape is distracting and not part of the original photograph (only a subsequent addition to this print). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The negative of this picture IS B&W. I think sepia prints were done to preserve the quality of the prints. I don't see the point of doing that now. Just to show you that it doesn't make sense: File:La Belle Otero, par Jean Reutlinger, sepia.jpg. Do you like better like that? Obviously it brings absolutely no additional value. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • If our scan is of a print, then we should remain true to that print (minus later additions such as dust, scratches, tape, fingerprints, etc.). I'm against adding sepia to non-sepia images (say, scans of negatives) and removing sepia from sepia images. Aside from being a way to make the quality of the print more easily preserved, the choice of sepia could have easily been a creative choice from the photographer. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • You don't answer to my question: do you like like File:La Belle Otero, par Jean Reutlinger, sepia.jpg better? i.e. would you support that alternative? Regards, Yann (talk) 20:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • Currently, no. That tape in the corner would need to go first (as it was not originally part of the print). I've said or implied this three times already. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
          • @Crisco 1492: I removed the tape, and also tried to correct the over-exposition in the right bottom corner. OK now? Regards, Yann (talk) 20:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support sepia version, but still oppose the B&W image. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2015 at 21:28:44 (UTC)

Reason

The original file, at 5,444,352 pixels, is very high resolution. There is no significant contrast in this photo, and no image noise that I can see. It shows its subject, the Queensboro Bridge, in nearly its entire length (it's impossible to show it fully from this angle, though, because the bridge extends inland on both sides and is sandwiched between skyscrapers). It's also a FP on two other wikis.

Articles in which this image appears

Queensboro Bridge, List of Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology

Creator

User:Simsala111

• Support as nominator – Epic Genius (talk) 21:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Highly compressed, looks like there's a bit of CA on the bridge. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:03, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • 3,264 × 2,448 px is the largest size of the original image. Epic Genius (talk) 01:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Absolutely irrelevant. I didn't say it was downsampled, but it's been compressed. At that resolution, the file size should be northwards of 3 mb (at least). This was saved as JPG 6 or 7, probably, and it shows: there are numerous JPG artefacts in the image. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • I apologize if I misunderstood you. However, I was not the creator of the original image. Epic Genius (talk) 12:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Appears tilted. Composition is not great. 109.157.11.62 (talk) 23:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Support -- A significant NYC landmark that is difficult to photograph, even from a boat, and (if the image quality is fine) then go for it. Though I do see how the composition might be in question since the entire bridge cannot be photographed. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 12:10, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose I agree with Crisco, the image must have been compressed to have that high resolution but such low file size, it's lacking in crispness in parts. Mattximus (talk) 02:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2015 at 23:09:13 (UTC)

Reason

High quality scan of a notable and interesting painting. Important for any of us who've thought of washing our hands of this place.

Articles in which this image appears

After the Bath, Woman drying herself +1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Edgar Degas

• Support as co-nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – as a co-nom - Hafspajen (talk) 00:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – It's Degas. Sca (talk) 00:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:26, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Oh my, yes. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 17:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:After the Bath, Woman drying herself - Edgar Degas - National Gallery.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2015 at 02:24:50 (UTC)

Reason

Striking illustration of a patrol boat moving at high speed. The photo is already featured on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Patrol boat, United States Navy

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water

Creator

Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Kenneth G. Takada

• Support as nominator – Pine^✉ 02:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Aerials are cut off, and this can be easily re-taken to include them, as well as have a brighter day that might help bring some details out - very dark in places... gazhiley 13:48, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Fantastic quality action shot. I agree it's a shame about the aerials, but everything else is great to my eye. 81.141.231.231 (talk) 20:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Only -- I am not sure I am qualified to vote on this one, but the aerials being cut off is . . . distracting. Like a photo of someone without the feet. Though I would love to be on that boat! HullIntegrity^\ talk / 17:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2015 at 23:41:17 (UTC)

Reason

High technical quality, good view of an important part of Spanish architecture

Articles in which this image appears

Cybele Palace, Plaza de Cibeles +3

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Carlos Delgado

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:41, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Impressive structure. (Should the asphalt in the foreground be cropped a bit?) However, Cybele Palace is a two-paragraph stub; one has to read Plaza de Cibeles to find out the palace was built in 1909. Sca (talk) 13:06, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Looks good to me, although I do agree with above, the stub makes the EV low, but good enough for now. Mattximus (talk) 20:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2015 at 23:41:41 (UTC)

Reason

With the original painting lost, this copy has the greatest possible EV in the article Portrait of Alfonso I d'Este, and good EV in the article on the subject

Articles in which this image appears

Alfonso I d'Este, Duke of Ferrara, Portrait of Alfonso I d'Este, +1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Titian

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. Pity they don't know who painted it or the year, but like Crisco said, it's the best we'll ever have. Mattximus (talk) 20:38, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support EV Alborzagros (talk) 10:14, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 04:09:24 (UTC)

Reason

Dramatic photo of a colorful sunset in Newport Beach, California

Articles in which this image appears

Newport Beach

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban

Creator

WPPilot

• Support as nominator – talk→ WPPilot  04:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - This looks to have been heavily upsampled. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Nice colors, but lacks discernible features in background. Sca (talk) 12:48, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Lacks features that distinguish this harbor from any other on earth, so there is no EV. Mattximus (talk) 14:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2015 at 21:54:15 (UTC)

Reason

Pilatus PC 12 is a Turbo Prop commuter plane that is designed to provide affordable commuter transportation to charter clients. Here it is shown next to 2 Challenger 600 jets to show is size in comparison to the larger charter Jets.

Articles in which this image appears

Pilatus PC 12

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Air

Creator

WPPilot

• Support as nominator – talk→ WPPilot  21:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Composition seems a bit confused to me. 86.150.71.4 (talk) 00:27, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Sorry, but the front part where the engine is appears too shadowy. The neighboring aircraft are distracting. It doesn't appear that the full width of the wingspan is in the photograph either. Étienne Dolet (talk) 02:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Per Étienne, lighting issues, composition. Sca (talk) 12:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I have to agree -- the shadow really takes away from what the picture is trying to show. chsh (talk) 17:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist - talk→ WPPilot  02:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2015 at 22:20:48 (UTC)

Reason

High quality scan of an illustrative historical image. I'm surprised we don't have any FPs of chain gangs.

Articles in which this image appears

Chain gang

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others

Creator

Detroit Publishing Co; restored by Scewing

• Support as nominator –  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:20, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support This is a shocking photo which clearly illustrates this topic. Nick-D (talk) 23:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per Nick-D.--Godot13 (talk) 00:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - High EV. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Historic value Alborzagros (talk) 10:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Sociological EV. Sca (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 18:15, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: a sad time in history and needs to be kept for documentation. Now there would be videos. Excellent EV. Fylbecatulous talk 12:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Per Nick-D, Fylbecatulous, Sca & Bruce 1ee. Great find. talk→ WPPilot  06:04, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Wonderful picture and great EV! chsh (talk) 17:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:A Southern chain gang c1903-restore.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:21, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2015 at 06:48:16 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Emma, Lady Hamilton

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

George Romney

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 06:48, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Yann (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I removed the spot in her hair. It looked bad. Yann (talk) 12:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is the spot in the original painting? "It looked bad" does strike me as a pretty poor reason to edit a painting... Josh Milburn (talk) 21:33, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've reverted- you shouldn't be uploading files over the top of featured pictures. If you want to upload it separately, go for it, but my question above still stands. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • @J Milburn: Looking at the spot closely, it doesn't seem to be from the painting. I mean, either it is a defect on the picture, or the painting is damaged. Yann (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2015 at 07:07:43 (UTC)

Reason

EV + HQ

Articles in which this image appears

Carl Larsson

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Carl Larsson

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 07:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Question I'm not sure I see any EV here, is in only found in one article buried in one of the two galleries? Mattximus (talk) 13:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  This painting belongs to Carl Larsson's art works and is so artistic and has got much EV. Alborzagros (talk) 13:16, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2015 at 14:08:21 (UTC)

Reason

Looks like the previous image was delisted and currently we don't have an FP for this. This one is the current lead image, showing the recent condition of the wall as of 2013. Also, the greenery typical to wuxia films is there. Despite some noise at remote distances looks fairly good.

Articles in which this image appears

Great Wall of China, List of walls, Ibn Battuta

FP category for this image

Places/Architecture

Creator

Severin.stalder

• Support as nominator – Brandmeister^talk 14:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ALT Yann (talk) 18:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. Although the Great Wall of China certainly deserves a featured picture, I can hardly believe this is the best and most encyclopedic picture available to Wikipedia, considering thousands of tourists photograph it every day. While it has plenty of aesthetic appeal, my main concern is that the colours seem to be far from accurate: the saturation appears to have been artificially increased to the point that the distant mountains are a fluorescent blue (compare with the more natural pale bluish grey of the faraway mountains in File:A_long_stretch_of_the_Great_Wall.jpg and in File:GreatWall_2004_Summer_1.jpg and in File:GreatWall6.jpg). There also seems to be some vignetting. dllu (t,c) 06:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Dllu — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit added. Brandmeister^talk 08:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2015 at 05:37:02 (UTC)

Reason

High quality, high EV. First year of issue of the Japanese yen. Twenty yen in gold was the highest denomination struck. On average, the 20 yen gold coin weighs 33.33 grams, is 0.900 pure, and weighs 0.96 of an ounce. (The present layout appears customary).

Articles in which these images appear

Japanese yen

FP category for this image

Currency

Creator

Empire of Japan.
From the National Numismatic Collection, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution.

• Support as nominator – Godot13 (talk) 05:37, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support High quality image and much EV. Alborzagros (talk) 06:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Is it just me, or is there an artefact surrounding the coins? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite sure I understand, could you elaborate?--Godot13 (talk) 17:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• There appear to be faint, light gray circles around both coins. Maybe a pixel thick, if that. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll tweak it in a few hours when I'm home...--Godot13 (talk) 20:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Crisco- I couldn't really see the lines, but I reworked the image from the original regardless. Any better?--Godot13 (talk) 22:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - Yep, that got it. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Yann (talk) 16:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Nice photo good contrast and color. talk→ WPPilot  01:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Japan 1870 20 Yen (alt).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2015 at 09:56:50 (UTC)

Reason

HQ + EV

Articles in which this image appears

Les Joueurs de football and Harald Giersing

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Harald Giersing

• Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 09:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Very nice painting, and it helps to illustrate a genre of sports painting that is described quite well in the article Les Joueurs de football. CorinneSD (talk) 15:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Awesome painting. Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Category? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:37, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I also question the EV of this image (in addition to the one above), there is no article for this painting, it is only found in the gallery section, and under the painter's main page, less than a sentence is given to this painting. It's a lovely painting and scan, but I'm not sure it is useful in an encyclopaedic sense. Mattximus (talk) 02:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - great image, but not sharp for a still photo. Bammesk (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]