Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/June-2023

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.


	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Ignace Tonené

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 May 2023 at 17:06:16 (UTC)

Reason: Clearly taken in bright sunlight which leads to a somewhat high contrast, but that's fine. We have little Canadian content due to their libraries being fairly locked down, so it's nice to grab what we can. Nice photo overall.
Articles in which this image appears: Ignace Tonené +4
FP category for this image: I don't know what to put him under. Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others, I guess.
Creator: William John Winter, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 17:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Shame about the contrast, but if you set that aside it's actually a pretty good photograph and scan, with good detail on the face and the amazing left hand, and nice texture on the trousers and socks. And since this may be the only photo of him in existence, EV is very high. Choliamb (talk) 15:55, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:17, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: might be my eyes, but is it slightly tilted, and if so, should we correct? UndercoverClassicist (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I corrected to the point I'd have to start cropping a lot out. Original was worse. I could go a little further once it's off the main page. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 20:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Crisco 1492, Bammesk, Choliamb, MER-C, and UndercoverClassicist: Gave it a little tweak. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 04:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Tournenie (HS85-10-21122).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing KC-46 Pegasus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2023 at 03:55:39 (UTC)

Reason: Quality photo of a KC-46 refueling aircraft connecting with a F-35. The KC-46 is to replace the KC-135 as the primary refueling aircraft of the U.S. Air Force. The transition process is ongoing and the replacement is to take place in the coming years in late 2020s.
Articles in which this image appears: Boeing KC-46 Pegasus, 461st Flight Test Squadron
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Air
Creator: U.S. Air Force, photographer: Ethan Wagner

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 03:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Meh. – Sca (talk) 14:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's pretty nice, and a difficult shot - remember, it'd likely have to be shot by an aircraft matching speed. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 03:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Snehrashmi (talk) 16:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:45, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 13:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:KC-46 refuels F-35 20190122.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Sullivan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2023 at 02:57:31 (UTC)

Reason: A nice photo of a notable actor with several premières to his name, most famously as the Judge in his brother's Trial by Jury. Died in 1877 after a relatively short career (he started acting in 1870), so there's not that many options. This replaced File:Fred Sullivan.jpg in the article, which is basically the same image, just worse (Some sort of book reproduction, maybe?).
Articles in which this image appears: Fred Sullivan, The Lost Chord
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Oliver Sarony (Napoleon Sarony's brother), restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 02:57, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 09:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Josh Milburn (talk) 11:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 13:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 16:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - MA Javadi (talk) 06:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Fred Sullivan by Oliver Sarony.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coenonympha glycerion

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2023 at 09:45:55 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC this month, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Coenonympha glycerion
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:45, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:36, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 13:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 10:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.207.232.203 (talk) [reply]

Struck vote as it was made by an unregistered user. If it was Aviafanboi, then he should login and vote after that. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 19:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Coenonympha glycerion - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chatham albatross

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2023 at 09:59:21 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Chatham albatross
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support: cracking photograph which shows a lot of technical skill. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 19:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 20:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is not the infobox image, it appears lower down in the page. If it is to be FP, should it not replace the infobox image? --Tagooty (talk) 03:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 13:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Chatham Albatross 0A2A3857.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth II

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2023 at 21:55:43 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image of the late Queen of the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth realms
Articles in which this image appears: Commonwealth realm, Diamond Jubilee of Elizabeth II, Diamond jubilee, Monarchy of Australia, Order of Australia, History of monarchy in Australia, Jewels of Elizabeth II etc
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility
Creator: State of Queensland

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 21:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Not sure of the impetus for this Australia-specific nom. Given the massive coverage of her death last September, every literate reader knows she was queen of the United Kingdom and of the Commonwealth realms, including Australia. – Sca (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're right. – Vinícius O. (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a good photo, but I'd like to see it in her article. I'm not saying you can't promote multiple images for multiple uses, but that's usually from sense of time, e.g. a young Darwin, or W.S. Gilbert nearer the age he wrote a play; What makes her more Australian in this photo than any of the other ones from her Diamond Jubilee? Is there a wallaby cropped just out of frame? Does the crown have corks dangling from it that were photoshopped out?

I'm a bit sarcastic there, but ye see the point. It's a fine photo of her; better for her late years than any other photo in her article. So it's promotable, but... not as used. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 04:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your feedback. It is much appreciated. – Vinícius O. (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That said, I will follow this up with one more thought: If that ribbon she's wearing is significant and meaningful, that might pull this up a bit. But, as I said, I think all that really needs to happen with it is it being in Queen Elizabeth II in some prominent usage, or even just being the lead in Diamond Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II might be enough. Just, y'know. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 12:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The EV seems pretty strong here for articles on the monarchy of Australia. Elizabeth II's role as Queen of Australia was, at least technically, separate to all her other roles. The photo depicts her with broaches linked to this role: that on her right shoulder is themed around Australia's national flower, the wattle. That on her left shoulder is also wattle themed and includes the Australian coat of arms. Nick-D (talk) 01:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That does justify this a lot more, although I'd like to see that explained somewhere - file description page, say. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 06:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditional~~ Support on Nick-D's points being added to the file descripion. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 19:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 11:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wow (talk) 00:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Queen of Australia.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Cleveland Orchestra

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 00:05:31 (UTC)

Reason: Image is of good quality capturing the essence of a spirited performance by the Cleveland Orchestra in front of a packed house inside the legendary and elegant Severance Hall.
Articles in which this image appears: Cleveland_Orchestra
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Cbusram

Support as nominator – Cbusram (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Barely minimal size, the iPhone 12 camera has more resolution than that... Also highlights in choir clothing are quite blown. Going back to the original for some editing might improve this a bit. Janke | Talk 20:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for valid criticism. Image is unedited. I felt this effect made choir appear angelic but you are correct in the technical sense choir is overblown. Your comments are appreciated. Cbusram (talk) 00:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – the composition (framing) is awesome. I agree with Janke and I am undecided on voting for it. Bammesk (talk) 13:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you I appreciate your taking time to provide feedback. Cbusram (talk) 01:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The photo's quality is good in ttal; but my personal expectation of the photo's resolution was/is higher. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 11:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response. I apologize for resolution. Photograph was taken under challenging and difficult conditions. DLSR cameras and cell phone usage are prohibited during performance at Severance Hall. Person seated close to me was asked several times to turn off phone by usher and I didn’t want to distract other people attending concert so I had to shoot picture quickly with almost no time to adjust camera settings. Cbusram (talk) 01:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Schröder

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2023 at 13:28:31 (UTC)

Reason: Quality lead image of this professional basketball player. A wider crop of this image is FP on Commons. En-Wiki editors have cropped it and I agree that this tighter vertical crop is more expressive and impactful. Schröder currently plays for the Los Angeles Lakers.
Articles in which this image appears: Dennis Schröder
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Sport
Creator: Stepro

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 13:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Don't know how I missed this. Support. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 19:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:19, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wow (talk) 00:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:2022-07-03 Basketball, Männer, European Qualifiers, Deutschland - Polen 1DX 1386 by Stepro (cropped).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dirt jumping

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2023 at 13:02:35 (UTC)

Reason: Quality lead image of the sport dirt jumping. Somewhat oddly it is also the lead image in the article Free will. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Dirt jumping, Free will
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Sport
Creator: Fischer.H

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the dirt? There’s nothing to indicate that this couldn’t be a ramp jump. Step hen 14:15, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's a valid critique. I was concerned about it as well. It is a drawback. Then I thought the visual strength of the image (in terms of making users want to read its article, per instructions on top of the WP:FPC page) might make up for that drawback. So I put it up for a vote. That's certainly a valid critique though. Bammesk (talk) 16:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a very good image. I'm just in doubt of the EV for its current uses Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 17:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wulfenite

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 09:59:17 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Wulfenite, La Paz County, Arizona
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the best mineral images in a while. Not that the others are bad, just I think this one is particularly well lit, and a particularly attractive specimen. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 12:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 16:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for another great "Leidus" - --Janke | Talk 09:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 12:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I always support an Ivar Lidus image Aviafanboi (talk) 11:27, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Wulfenite - Red Cloud mine, La Paz Co., Arizona, USA.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Winter moth caterpillar

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 10:08:20 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Winter moth
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Reinhold Möller

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Quick clarification: Is a "small frost moth" a type of/synonym for "winter moth", a literal translation from the German, or...? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 12:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adam, the file description was written by the photographer, a native German speaker. This link says "frostspanner" translates into "winter moth", not "frost moth", despite google translation which gives "frost moth". A search for "frost moth" doesn't turn up anything meaningful. I updated the file description and the image caption of this nom. Bammesk (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, then. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 17:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Personally, I prefer this illustration. – Sca (talk) 12:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 17:09, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – --Janke | Talk 09:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 12:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good shot. --Petar Milošević (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nythar (💬-🍀) 07:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Operophtera brumata (caterpillar) focus stacking-20230508-RM-131624.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very Large Telescope

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 21:06:49 (UTC)

Reason: Image of the Very Large Telescope array in northern Chile. The image is a bit noisy and unsharp, but hopefully the EV and composition makes up for it.
Articles in which this image appears: Very Large Telescope, plus one
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Understanding
Creator: European Southern Observatory, photographer Gerhard Hüdepohl

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 21:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though I should note my dad worked on designing the mirror mounts for this, so I'm biased. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 07:15, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – --Janke | Talk 09:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 13:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 11:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Paranal and the Pacific at sunset (dsc4088, retouched, cropped).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Davison

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2023 at 07:13:47 (UTC)

Reason: A nice photo, replaced a much worse copy of same. I could square off the border, if desired, but I'd have to edit out the photographer's stamp to do so.
Articles in which this image appears: Emily Davison + several others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political is where we generally put political activists.
Creator: Andrew William Dron, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 07:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support strongly – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – nice restoration. Bammesk (talk) 03:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Though I'm wondering just a bit if we need all that blank backdrop over subject's head. – Sca (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a common feature in photos of the era. We could do it, but it'd mean losing the border as well - can't have half a border, which does mean cutting the signature, etc. There's a link on the file description page to a squared-off version if you want to play with it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 13:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think I can resist that urge. -- Sca (talk) 11:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I always like to make a version like that, though: Can fill in corners and such and thus avoid the pitfalls of when others do it. And then compare the two and see which I like better. (e.g. Was pretty sure I was going uncropped for the recent Charleston after Sherman picture, but it ate up too much space for thumbnails. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 12:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I read somewhere that when she arrived at Dron's studio he asked her to stand on a milk crate so that she would fill the whole frame, but she wouldn't do it because she felt it would be undignified. Choliamb (talk) 00:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 00:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Emily Wilding Davison by Andrew William Dron.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incense in Vietnam

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2023 at 20:06:57 (UTC)

Reason: As a disclaimer, I was actually asked to nominate this by User:Aviafanboi, who is new to Wikipedia and hence ineligible to participate at FPC, but has an interest in the area having been helping with POTD scheduling recently. That said, I'm happy to own this nom and recommend it myself - the picture looks excellent quality to me, and was recently passed at Commons as a Featured Picture over there. It also has good EV for the incense article, depicting the production of incense in Vietnam.
Articles in which this image appears: Incense
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Other
Creator: Vietsui

Support as nominator – — Amakuru (talk) 20:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – User:Aviafanboi can participate at FPC as of June 1st, when they had 100 total edits (which broke down to 90 live edits and 10 deleted edits). Bammesk (talk) 00:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bit biased as I asked to nominate this. Aviafanboi (talk) 11:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I love the picture, but I'm not sure I fully understand it. Are the "bushes" how the incense is dried, and then they're collected, and are the ones on the ground collected or being set up? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 12:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I pretty sure that the bushes are the way the incense is dried and I think that the ones on the ground are the ones that have been collected, but I'm not sure. Aviafanboi (talk) 13:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I checked with the photographer. This is mid-setup. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 18:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Doesn't add much EV to incense article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:26, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment & Abstain- Nice composition & color, but the bottom part of the image is very unsharp. --Janke | Talk 17:44, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (talk) 22:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Incense in Vietnam.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Algal bloom

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 10:07:30 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Algal bloom
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Other
Creator: Nikolay Bulykin

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support as an author Thank you for nomination, but being honest, it's not algae, it's duckweed. But not so matter tho. Red ^{wanna talk?} 12:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your honesty - but that means I have to withdraw this as it does not illustrate the article in which it was placed. MER-C 13:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn. MER-C 13:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Male European bison

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2023 at 13:47:00 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image of vulnerable species in the wild. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: European bison
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 15:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Replaces existing FP File:Bison bonasus (Linnaeus 1758).jpg. MER-C 18:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Only major thing better about that one - and Charles' has a lot more going for it - is the old FP shows the feet a bit, which is arguably a plus. Charles' composition is much cleaner; the old FP is very unbalanced and busy. Pose maybe a hair better in the old FP. Think Charles wins here. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 19:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~@Adam Cuerden: Looks like you voted twice here, Adam.~~ Oops, I confused your comment with MER-C's vote. Sorry about that. Choliamb (talk) 11:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I prefer the existing FP, which MER-C linked above, and which I think has a much stronger sense of place. The image nominated here, with the subject standing in an open, grassy field in perfect light, is a fine photograph, as one expects from Charles; it would be perfect on a cattle breeder's web site, but in my opinion it has less EV than the previous FP, which better reflects the original forest habitat of the European species (in constrast to the plains-dwelling North American species). The previous FP had been stable in the article for more than a decade, and was replaced by this one only a month ago. As a result, the previous FP no longer appears in the article at all. I think that was a ill-advised change and one that should probably be reverted. Choliamb (talk • contribs) 12:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure your comments above were made in good faith Choliamb, but let me explain the European bison's habitat. It lives in the forest but has to come out to feed. It is standing in a natural meadow, not a farm field. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:22, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I certainly didn't mean to imply that you had actually taken the photo on a farm, Charles, only that it was the kind of perfectly lit and posed image that any stockbreeder would love. But I still prefer the previous FP, precisely because of the mud and the mist and the unruly framing, and I think it's a shame that you chose to remove it entirely from the article in favor of your own. Choliamb (talk) 23:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do put it back if you wish. I have a thing against captive animals; their appearance, habitat etc. can be quite different to those of wild animals. A bison in the wild would not be in this sort of muddy spot in March. This animal is in a small bison enclosure in what is effectively a zoo. Not good for the animal at all. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 11:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 18:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:European bison (Bison bonasus) male Białowieza.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffroy's tamarin

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2023 at 13:44:28 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image of species Near Threatened in the wild. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Geoffroy's tamarin
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 13:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 15:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 23:57, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – MA Javadi (talk) 20:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Geoffroy's tamarin (Saguinus geoffroyi) 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Emerald swift

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2023 at 13:55:30 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Sceloporus malachiticus Phrynosomatidae
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:55, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 13:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 15:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light could be beter. --Petar Milošević (talk) 07:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – MA Javadi (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nythar (💬-🍀) 07:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Emerald swift (Sceloporus malachiticus) Finca El Pilar.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ike & Tina Turner, 1971

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2023 at 15:07:16 (UTC)

Reason: Quite a nice image; probably the best we have of them together. Admittedly, African-Americans with dark hair in a darkish background isn't ideal for black and white photography, but I think it does very well within the constraints
Articles in which this image appears: Ike & Tina Turner, crop used in Tina Turner
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Rob Mieremet for Anefo, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 15:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tricky to support anything to do with Ike. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:30, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I get that, but it's part of her history. Can't tell the story of Tina Turner without him. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 21:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, but our term FP looks like an endorsement. I'm not going to oppose. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Must admit to misgivings about featuring Ike Turner, given his personal foibles. -- Sca (talk) 14:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sca and Charlesjsharp: I mean, we have FPs of Confederate generals, Nazi propoganda, and Queen Elizabeth II, who apparently is even more controversial, so I'm not sure I can quite see it as an endorsement, so long as we caption it appropriately, noting his bad behaviour. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 17:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Point taken. Not opposed if handled appropriately. -- Sca (talk) 12:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Not a fan of a FP of them as a couple. I much rather have her solo photo. Bammesk (talk) 16:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, this is what existed that I could work on. It's the era of her work that there's photos worth restoring for, and it's better than any other image we have for this era. Given it was this or not do anything to celebrate her life. I chose this Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 17:22, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 23:16, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm as reluctant as anyone to endorse Ike Turner, but that's not what we're deciding here. Supporting because of the work of the photographer and restorer and because of the quality and historical importance of this image. MartinPoulter (talk) 10:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Despite my misgivings about Ike, the duo are notable enough as a pair that the EV carries the nom for me. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just to note, this has now passed on Commons. I am very bad at actually putting images up for the POTD dates on Commons, mind ye. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 23:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ike & Tina Turner, Bestanddeelnr 924-2170 - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plantago lanceolata

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2023 at 15:41:18 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Plantago lanceolata
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 15:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 02:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 23:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:17, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Plantago lanceolata - Kulna.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Raikoke

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2023 at 16:06:40 (UTC)

Reason: Featured unanimously on Commons in 2021.
Articles in which this image appears: Raikoke
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking back
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 16:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 01:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Slightly concerning is the "as of 2019" phrase in the target article. – Sca (talk) 12:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – MA Javadi (talk) 17:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Raikoke Volcano Erupts (48132762546).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kowloon Walled City

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2023 at 16:59:58 (UTC)

Reason: Good lead image of Kowloon Walled City. This is a 1989 photo. The neighborhood was demolished in 1993. The photo quality isn't high (resolution and sharpness). Given the neighborhood is now gone, I think the EV of this image makes up for its quality.
Articles in which this image appears: Kowloon Walled City, +4
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator: Ian Lambot

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 16:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I saw where this was at Hong Kong Wikimania. Lovely park now. Quality isn't great, but it's irreplaceable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 17:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per Adam Cuerden. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and very high EV Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 14:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Kowloon Walled City - 1989 Aerial.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Experimental Diesel Engine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2023 at 04:53:44 (UTC)

Reason: The picture has been taken in a (very) good quality; also: the importance of the topic in automobile engineering & mechanical engineering majors/disciplines.
Articles in which this image appears: Diesel engine, Overhead valve engine
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Machinery
Creator: Kulmalukko

Support as nominator – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – nice subject but the image isn't sharp when viewed at full size, especially the top half. Bammesk (talk) 01:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I like the image, that vent is kind of distracting, and... I don't know, I haven't been there, but it feels like a higher view would help deal with the ceiling issue. It's a good image, but it doesn't feel very... intentional as to how they arranged the background and such. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 00:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trooping the Colour

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2023 at 02:20:27 (UTC)

Reason: Good quality picture
Articles in which this image appears: British Army, Trooping the Colour, List of Trooping the Colour by event from 1890
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Others
Creator: Corporal Paul Shaw

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 02:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – The composition is great but the technical quality is poor. There is lens distortion (the verticals are tilted) and chromatic aberration. On a sidenote: it was shot with a high-end camera [1], so I am surprised by the pixel count. Bammesk (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Bammesk. It should be possible to have a much better photo of this regularly conducted event. Nick-D (talk) 23:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose — It's a great picture but it's not level. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 18:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Mundy Peterson

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2023 at 00:38:50 (UTC)

Reason: A rather good image; souvenier of a celebration of the man (hence me including the mount) so decent EV in itself, and very high resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Thomas Mundy Peterson
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: William R. Tobias, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 00:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 13:43, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 20:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 23:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Thomas Mundy Peterson by William R. Tobias.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese hajj scroll

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2023 at 10:08:09 (UTC)

Original – Chinese scroll with the text of surat al-Hajj

Reason: Extremely high-resolution scan of a five-meter long scroll with Arabic and Chinese text, showing the routes used by pilgrims from China. Already an FP on Commons. Multiple sections of the scroll have educational value in their own right.
Articles in which this image appears: Al-Hajj
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/East Asian art
Creator: Khalili Collections/ Google Art Project, uploaded by MartinPoulter (KC WIR)

Support as nominator – MartinPoulter (talk) 10:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Visual information is not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 12:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think Sca's point is completely valid - perhaps it might take more explanation than some, but there's plenty of imagery, but I'm confused about the curved lines. Was this photographed not lying flat? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 16:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the paper (or substrate) shrunk (or deformed) over time because of unusual storage conditions?! I think it's lying flat because the focus or sharpness is uniform. Maybe it wasn't photographed, but scanned (in multiple sections) using a flatbed scanner (it's 12 inches wide). Bammesk (talk) 02:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Looking at the items most likely to be square (i.e., the seals), there does appear to be some warpage of the scroll. I see that portions of the scroll are also used elsewhere (the map is used at Islam in China), which shows how high the EV is. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Between this and Bammesk's comment, Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 18:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:07, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 02:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Khalili Collection Hajj and Arts of Pilgrimage MSS 1288.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Philippe Chaperon

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2023 at 16:20:16 (UTC)

Reason: Quite good for its period. We've featured so many of his works, it seems worth it to have a photo of him. Face is very sharp (for the era, anyway).
Articles in which this image appears: Philippe Chaperon
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Atelier Nadar, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 16:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 11:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Interesting person, visage. – Sca (talk) 13:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Great restoration. Nythar (💬-🍀) 13:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - something in the top right corner? MER-C 11:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, missed a little bit when removing the edge of the frame, it seems. A moment. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 00:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Snehrashmi (talk) 03:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Choliamb (talk) 23:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 14:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Philippe Chaperon by Atelier Nadar.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Female cardinal butterfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2023 at 20:59:44 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Argynnis pandora
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 12:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 23:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 14:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cardinal (Argynnis pandora) female underside Dobruja.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Male hairy dragonfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2023 at 21:07:44 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Hairy dragonfly
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 12:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 23:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 14:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hairy dragonfly (Brachytron pratense) male Burren.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Sagan and a Viking lander

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2023 at 16:21:46 (UTC)

Reason: High quality photo
Articles in which this image appears: Carl Sagan, Viking program
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there
Creator: NASA/JPL, photo from the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum collection

Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 16:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Sadly, a LOT of compression artifacts. A better version must exist somewhere... --Janke | Talk 16:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not going to lie - I'm very disappointed that I was unable to find anything better online. This appears to be from the same event, but the LOC is not actually indicating whether the photographer was officially with NASA/JPL (and thus the image is free) or if he was a private-sector photographer who happened to be there (and thus non-free). It's a shame, too - this is an excellent image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
LoC photo is credited to Bill Ray here [2]. Artem.G (talk) 14:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's also credited to him on the LOC page. It doesn't specify anything that would help us determine whether the image is free. For comparison, the images Pete Souza took for the White House would be PD, but anything he's done in the private sector are copyrighted unless released under a copyleft license. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing nomination. I wasn't able to find a clearer photo, and though it's a great photo its quality is mediocre at best. Artem.G (talk) 13:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lesser violetear

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2023 at 21:14:38 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Lesser violetear
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 19:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 12:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Snehrashmi (talk) 03:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lesser violetear (Colibri cyanotus cabanidis).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:15, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sergei Prokofiev

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2023 at 14:03:48 (UTC)

Reason: Another great Bain image of a composer with a high EV
Articles in which this image appears: Sergei Prokofiev, his symphonies 1 and 2, War and Peace (opera), Music of the Soviet Union
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Bain News Service, uploaded by Materialscientist

Support as nominator – MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 14:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Looks like Prokofiev was not sitting still for the camera. Not quite sure how I feel about it; for 1918, I can forgive it, but at the same time it is a major flaw in the image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) Comment – I was about to say the same thing when Chris's comment went up. At small sizes this looks okay, but at higher resolutions the face is pretty badly out of focus, so much so that I think it probably fails to meet the criteria for FP. Prokofiev was photographed a lot, so I would think that it shouldn't be too hard to find a better image. But then I haven't actually tried, and the number of photos without copyright restrictions may be much smaller than I imagine. Choliamb (talk) 15:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a series, these two looks sharper File:Sergei Prokofiev 04.jpg and File:Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708412.jpg, and these two are out of focus File:Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708410.jpg, File:Sergei Prokofiev 03.jpg

File:Sergei Prokofiev 04.jpg is a nice image... a recrop (current crop is too close on the shoes) might be featurable — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see then, I'll get started on File:Sergei Prokofiev 04.jpg and reupload the original. Withdrawing nomination. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Crisco 1492 and @Choliamb, thoughts on this crop? I tried following what File:Sergei Prokofiev 04.jpg did by keeping the fireplace in frame, but it may be odd having him off center. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 16:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MyCatIsAChonk: I may be wrong, but I don't think that's what Chris had in mind when he mentioned recropping. I suspect he was suggesting that you go back to the original full version of no. 4 from the Library of Congress (File:Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708419.tif) and make a more generous crop than the one by Materialscientist that you originally linked to (File:Sergei Prokofiev 04.jpg), which is very tight at the bottom. It's a good full-length portrait and worth preserving, rather than cutting him off at the thighs, which to me at least looks a little odd (although maybe that's because I've already seen the original). Cheers, Choliamb (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was thinking more like File:Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708419 Crop 2.tif (I'm a sucker for full portraits). If we were to go for a 3/4 crop, I'd definitely want more space by the elbows to give him some breathing room. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That makes more sense, I'll get started soon. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 01:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Crisco 1492, just uploaded a restored version. Before I send it to FPC, what're your thoughts? MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 02:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MyCatIsAChonk, that looks excellent. I'd definitely support that. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing in favor of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708419 Crop 2.jpg. MER-C 11:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted MER-C 11:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Livingstone

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2023 at 00:31:31 (UTC)

Reason: This is one of the most stunningly detailed photos I've seen in a while - probably need to look at George N. Barnard or Mathew Brady et al. to get similar. While that does definitely make the narrow focus planes of 1860s cameras a little more obvious, this is stunningly well reproduced. Admittedly, there was A. a drop in quality when the long exposure cameras gave way to the quicker exposure ones, so the 1860s is a bit of a sweet spot as that goes, but also B. the quality of prints from the photos generally wasn't as good as this - the recent George N. Barnard photo shows others could do it, but it was rarer and certainly not in wide-distribution prints like cabinet cards. Anyway, restoration notes on the file description page.

Any suggestions, leave 'em here, I'm going to bed and will review them in the morning. I find image restoration a good treatment for anxiety, so, yet again, Wikipedia benefits from my stress and panic. But now that I'm done - Sleep.
Articles in which this image appears: David Livingstone +3
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Religious figures, I guess?
Creator: Thomas Annan, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 00:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – a few spots in top right corner? Bammesk (talk) 03:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Uploading a fix now. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 07:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Historically notable; face shows strong character. – Sca (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with you. I am new around, not a professional user in the field of image reviewing, and just have relative knowledge about the topic. The image, which is taken in 1864, seems totally solid, completely worthy, and is certainly adequate for being a "Featured picture". – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bremps... 14:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Snehrashmi (talk) 03:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 23:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:David Livingstone by Thomas Annan.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sitar, late 19th Century

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2023 at 16:16:44 (UTC)

Reason: Good quality
Articles in which this image appears: Sitar (infobox photo)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: unknown, MET museum

Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 16:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Below the minimum threshhold of 1,500 px on the one side. Which is a shame, too, because this is a beautiful example. If only the MET had released the original resolution of the file. 13:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

(Unsigned entry by Crisco 1492)

Thanks, Janke. Signed now. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Kissel

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2023 at 13:49:18 (UTC)

Reason: Dynamic image of a performer on stage - he still plays his guitar raised over his head like this during concerts
Articles in which this image appears: Brett Kissel +2 lists
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Matt Duboff on Flickr

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's a surprising number of white specks at the bottom of the image. Was this a film photo? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 01:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a film photo. It was shot with this. The specks might be dead camera sensor pixels?! They can be removed. Bammesk (talk) 01:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have to look at the layout of the venue, but they could be phone screens or something similar. Whenever I had dead pixels they wouldn't really blur into the background like that. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, looking on a PC I'm seeing a couple that are certainly dead pixels (right above his arm, near the hat). I can deal with these after I get home from the office. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's arguably still a bluish dead pixel on his butt, though. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 11:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Garlic

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 09:56:17 (UTC)

Reason: Featured on Commons last week. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Garlic
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Others
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not sure this is Leidus' best work, but his very good is still excellent. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 01:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 15:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Garlic bulbs and cloves.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Three-spot grass yellow/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 09:59:37 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Nominated July 22. Received 4 support votes; no opposes.
Articles in which this image appears: Eurema blanda
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Timer reset due to delayed transclusion (was going to nominate this myself). MER-C 09:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 01:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Three-spot grass yellow (Eurema blanda blanda) underside Phuket.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Red-whiskered bulbul/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 09:59:37 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons. Nominated in Jan 2023; received 3 support votes; no opposes.
Articles in which this image appears: Red-whiskered bulbul
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Timer reset due to delayed transclusion. MER-C 09:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 13:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - can something be done about the ca. 3-pixel wide halo seen mainly on head and left of body? Looks like a masking artifact (maybe during de-noising the sky?) --Janke | Talk 19:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Focus is on tail, should be on the head. And too dark, exposure should be added. --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)--Petar Milošević (talk) 09:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Focus is on the head. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good EV and I find the focus to be proper as well --Muhammad(talk) 17:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Viperine water snake (Natrix maura)/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 09:59:37 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Nominated June 22 by TheFreeWorld. Received 4 support votes; no opposes.
Articles in which this image appears: Natrix maura
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Timer reset due to delayed transclusion. MER-C 09:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 01:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sol de Mañana 2018

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 11:48:07 (UTC)

Reason: It's a high quality image that depicts most components of the fumarole field in one photo: There is a steam vent along with rising steam, a mud pool with grey mud in the centre, several ponds of hot water rimmed by yellow sulfur deposits. One also sees the brown and white rocks, colours originating presumably from hydrothermal alteration.
Articles in which this image appears: Sol de Mañana
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: Kallerna

Support as nominator – Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The panorama may have more EV Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In the panorama the fine details are less visible, though. Especially the mud pools and steam emission. Also, maybe it's just me but it seems like there is a weird distortion in the middle. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination! —kallerna 06:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – --Janke | Talk 19:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Aviafanboi (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sol de Mañana 2018.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anemonoides blanda

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 16:58:03 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Anemonoides blanda
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
Creator: Reinhold Möller

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 15:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Snehrashmi (talk) 02:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nythar (💬-🍀) 20:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Balkan Windröschen (Anemone blanda)-20230407-RM-124525.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwig van Beethoven

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 18:01:19 (UTC)

Reason: appropriate quality
Articles in which this image appears: Ludwig van Beethoven, Joseph Karl Stieler, etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Joseph Karl Stieler (painter; 1781–1858)

Support as nominator – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Resolution is below the minimum, and far below the resolution threshhold that's been common for painting nominations. I'm also not sure on the colours - the pure white on Beethoven's forehead looks like blown highlights, for example. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's a version on Google Art Project. A moment. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 00:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 1. Alt 1 looks much better. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hamid Hassani and Crisco 1492: I've uploaded a much larger version. Support Alt 1 Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 00:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: Thank you indeed for uploading this much larger, clearer image. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alt 1, much better. The file description is missing the author: Joseph Karl Stieler. Bammesk (talk) 01:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. It was sort of there, just a bad typo ( {{Creator| instead of {{Creator: ) Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 09:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Oppose – Well, I'm ~~not sure about~~ against altering the saturation in this very famous portrait. The Joseph Karl Stieler article notes that it's "possibly Stieler's most reproduced work," and indeed it's been reproduced zillions of times (including on a CD I have of the Ninth Symphony by the Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra). One tends to think the Beethoven House in Bonn's version would be authoritative. As to which is more 'lifelike,' that's not the point. For encyclopedic purposes, it's which is more accurate? (FWIW, German Wiki also uses the orig.) – Sca (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Google Art Project is the same as on the museum's website Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 15:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention that this is an entirely different digitization than the one originally nominated. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 – Choliamb (talk) 15:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 Artem.G (talk) 06:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
comment the only problem with Alt 1 is that it's not used in any article... Artem.G (talk) 07:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alta get switched in on promotion Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 10:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 --Janke | Talk 19:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 1. MER-C 11:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Joseph Karl Stieler's Beethoven mit dem Manuskript der Missa solemnis.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore von Kármán at Arnold Air Force Base

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 12:25:13 (UTC)

Reason: High quality photo
Articles in which this image appears: Theodore von Kármán, SM-65 Atlas, AGARD-B, AGARD
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Vehicles/Air or maybe Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Weaponry
Creator: U.S. Air Force

Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 12:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There is minor damage to the image. Restoration should be quick and painless, but should be done before featuring this image. Aside from that... this is a very well staged picture, and honestly it probably has more EV for the two testing models. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can do it if you don't feel like it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 01:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't restored anything in ages. I can have a go tonight, though. It should only take a few minutes. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ALT 1 uploaded, support ALT 1 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

great, thanks for the restoration. I'll also support clean version. Artem.G (talk) 06:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alt 1 – What a great photo. When I was growing up in the 1960s and making plastic models of Sealab and Mercury space capsules, this is exactly what I thought working at NASA would look like. Choliamb (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ALT 1 – Bammesk (talk) 01:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 – --Janke | Talk 19:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 1. MER-C 17:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Theodore von Kármán 230419-F-F3405-0001 (restored).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Považský hrad

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2023 at 21:22:13 (UTC)

Reason: Good EV, nice quality, good composition, FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Považský hrad
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Ximonic

Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 21:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question - The other images in the article make it look like there's more to the castle. Is this just a different piece, or is it the angle, or...? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the site on Google Earth and although the details weren't clear, I am pretty sure the nom image is shot with the camera pointing east, and the infobox image is the other side of the same dwelling with the camera pointing west. Bammesk (talk) 01:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a great shot, technically, but (at thumbnail size, at least) it doesn't really look like a castle. The other images have higher EV in my view. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda have to agree about angles here. It's a quality image, and I'm glad we have it, but... Weak support. If it was part of a set shot at different angles, it'd be clearer. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 13:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Aviafanboi (talk) 13:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Vinícius O. (talk) 18:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]