Support Sure! Looks good, even if likely a bit of artistic license insofar as I believe black holes tend to have more accretion discs than shown. Adam Cuerden(talk)12:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2016 at 16:10:20 (UTC)
Reason
Shows the spread of Women's Suffrage across America in a very engaging way. The poem by Alice Duer Miller adds a fair bit of interest, and this image has been the main illustration on the artist's page since late 2014, albeit in a much lower-quality copy.
Henry "Hy" Mayer, restored by Adam Cuerden. Does "Hy" really count as a nickname, or is that just like the old Wm as short for William type of traditional abbreviations?
Support Not sure quite what the benefit is of Sca's comment. Yes it is dark. The room is dark. Anyway, looks good to me, excellent detail, and darkness is representative of the lighting level in the hall, on the basis of the heavy focussed lights on the exhibits, but not on the main floor itself... gazhiley16:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Being dark makes detail less accessible to the casual viewer of the Main Page, of whom there are millions every day. This isn't a technical comment – understand it's a dark scene. Sca (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I understand what you meant Sca, but not what the benefit of adding that comment is? What is the intended result of leaving a single word comment? And if there was no intended result then may I ask why you felt the need to do so? I just find it odd personally... gazhiley16:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we all have our personal foibles, don't we? But in this case, IMO, the photo doesn't fully meet criteria Nos. 1 or 3 due to the darkness of the subject. Sca (talk)
It wasn't a comment on you personally Sca, just saying the comment itself with any follow up or explanation was odd. Not you. The comment. Your further explaination makes more sense now, as I see that your "Dark" comment was saying that that is a bad thing - not just a random comment stating a fact... Thank you for explaining futher... gazhiley11:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It appears to be tilted to the left and underexposed between 1/3 and 2/3 EV. Also vertical center of the hall isn't in a center of the frame. SkywalkerPL (talk) 17:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC) +[reply]
The exhibition being off to the left justifies the choice of centre though. I'm not sure it's underexposed - I think that any increase in exposure would blow the brightly-lit exhibit. SupportAdam Cuerden(talk)02:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Depends on the arrangement of the station. If the architecture near the platform iis a lot more standard, the interesting other parts might well have higher EV. In any case, I think there's room for both. SupportAdam Cuerden(talk)05:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A few minor scratches, but that's easily fixable. I'll do that by tomorrow. Support ^alt in the meantime. Very grainy, but nothing appalling. Period where we kind of have to take what we can get Adam Cuerden(talk)10:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2016 at 10:10:19 (UTC)
Reason
ANZAC day is approaching, and I think we often forget New Zealand. This is an iconic image of the Māori Battalion, well-known in in New Zealand (I am assured by New Zealand friends).
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2016 at 15:47:40 (UTC)
Reason
High quality scan of a poster which both illustrates the subject and was used in education in the same, under a regime which emphasised Pancasila in all walks of life.
Support I don't understand a word of it, but it looks like it is high quality and its use is definitely encyclopedic. Cat-fivetc ---- 08:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Crisco 1492: That's mainly because it's a rather extreme crop of the original, though. Why not remove this from articles and put in the original, CSS cropped? I like the original better, anyway. Adam Cuerden(talk)15:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support ALT – uncropped version, and its use in articles by CSS image crop template, per above. It has the minimum pixels and good composition. Bammesk (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- This is going to get confusing... The "original" meaning the original presented here, or the original pre-crop image (which hasn't been presented here as an alt yet)?-Godot13 (talk) 16:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I introduced an alternate and amended my vote. The scan has some technical issues but the photograph's quality is too good not to support, IMO. Bammesk (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's an ACTUAL picture of ACTUAL Mars. Technology is amazing... Oh and this is an excellent picture that will get the attention of visitors to the site. gazhiley09:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2016 at 02:33:23 (UTC)
Reason
A rather nicely-composed image, showing many of the symbols of Welsh nationalism - flag, daffodil, druidicism/historical dress (I believe that's part of the druidicism that pervades such things as the Eisteddfod, but I can't prove that without a source).
Comment - @Adam Cuerden: the shot's amazing. Great quality. Symbolism is good. However, I'm hesitant in voting support (I'm inclined for a weak support, unless you convince me otherwise, and you usually do) because I'm worried about EV here. It seems like any other parade in Wales, and how this particular theme relates to St. David's Day is questionable on my end. Is this the only way they celebrate it? If so, is the costume of this person unique for St. David Day parades, or do people dress like this during other Wales parades as well? If it's the latter, I'm afraid the EV may drop considerably. Also, the guy on the left with the yellow jacket is kinda bugging me. Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@EtienneDolet: Offhand, I can't think of any other day widely celebrated with parades, to be honest - Admittedly, when I lived in Wales, I was out in Haverfordwest, not one of the big cities - still, anything I can think of that would be a parade, e.g. celebrating a sporting win, probably wouldn't involve costumes. Adam Cuerden(talk)09:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2016 at 08:15:00 (UTC)
Reason
This is a historic painting and a high technical standard and extremely high resolution photograph by the restoration team (53,671 × 47,584 pixels). High resolution is valuable for encyclopaedic use, as Bosch is famous for his fine detail work, for example the top right of the work shows a sinking ship and a crowd of fishermen dragging a giant fish out of the sea, details that are almost impossible to examine at conventional resolutions and best viewed on Wikipedia using the media zoom viewer. This image replaced a manipulated image and is an official research quality photograph/scan taken after recent restoration by the Bosch Research and Conservation Project. A scan at the same resolution of the painting using infra-red reflectography is available at File:Triptych of the crucified Martyr (infra-red reflectography).jpg.
Note, the image was so large that it was breaking the zoomviewer. The viewer has now been rebuilt after a modification to be able to cope, and you should be able to see the correct version of the file and zoom in down to see every brush stroke. --Fæ (talk) 22:48, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - What a treat. And a nice tie in for Bosch's quincentenary. (Especially for those of us who are not likely to get to the exhibition in the Netherlands). Mr impossible (talk) 12:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nergaal-I thought about it, but wanted to include some of the background (how often do you get to use part of an iceberg washed up on the shore as background?). The article does use a css image crop to make it a bit tighter.--Godot13 (talk) 17:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Borderline Support per Chris Woodrich. Given the file size I was expecting crisper. It's crisp enough to show the water droplets though, hence support. No opinion on the crop... gazhiley08:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough - possibly because hand held 1/200sec at 300mm not a good combination. The composition doesn't work very well for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent work, quality is exactly what this process is for - highlighting pictures like this. I'm intruiged by the way that the Chimneys appear to be habitated (if not now, then previously). Excellent... gazhiley08:49, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Nice capture of a nice little owl. Two notes: Detail at full resolution is a bit fuzzy, and the matching background doesn't provide much contrast. Sca (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support No issue with the background - it is the scenery this owl is found in, so helps with EV. Not full support though because per Sca the detail at full res is fuzzy, probably due to this literally being borderline sizewise. gazhiley08:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I like the background. It looks like a good camouflage, EV worthy. The details aren't perfect, but I think are Ok. (probably as good as it gets for the small camera and sensor, just about meets the 1500 pixels given the down sampling.) Bammesk (talk) 17:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support ALT – per comments below, seems like Atsme denoised and the jpg artifacts are gone (eye area). I agree with the file size comments by user Charlesjsharp below. May be denoising the original 4000x3000px image and then down sampling to 2000x1500px can produce a higher quality image. I like the image, but agree that the technical quality could be better. Bammesk (talk) 03:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the size of the file meets the requirements for FP (minimum of 1500 pixels in width and height) but I also realize larger files are preferred. The binomial name can easily be added by the nom.Done ✓16:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC) I agree that it lacks definition but does the EV make-up for it? I'm neither familiar with the region nor do I know how difficult it is to photograph this species. Input? Atsme📞📧16:15, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a shame so much of the Viper is out of focus, but the important parts are well captured, and the EV pushes this into the realm of a support... gazhiley08:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - have to agree with above, basically, only the head is sharp, so the rest of the area in the photo is almost superfluous. And cutting off the tip of the tail is just too much... ;) --Janke | Talk09:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – The in-focus area has lots of white spots, both on the animal's skin and on the sand (visible at 100%, but easier to see at 200%). Also, for a zoo photograph it can be better (stack focus and better lighting). Bammesk (talk) 01:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator – Full disclosure: Pallas' cat is also called "Manul", which is my name (conflict of interest?). Manul ~ talk15:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'd like to support, but the crop is too tight, with clipped head. Commons has several full-body shots, but they look unsharp at full size. Looks like it could be retaken easily. Brandmeistertalk17:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support – due to crop (or framing), but it's an interesting species and detail of coat and eyes is very good. Sca (talk) 15:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – for article use [2] 220px is too small, the car is hard to see. To the right is a 270px example crop, it puts more emphasis on the car. Just a suggestion. Bammesk (talk) 02:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
comment The lighting of the ski run is unfortunate and also it would be better to use the description cable car rather than North American tramway. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good EV. Admittedly at first I had some difficulty seeing the restoration other than some specks in the image. But then I noticed the very subtle restoration (not cropping) at the top and right edges...--Godot13 (talk) 04:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's why, when I copied images from the MET, I always kept a black border, to keep the canvas from looking artificially straight... Shame Google doesn't have the other three edges online. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I don't mind having a small bit of the painting cropped just to even it out. But is it such a crime to do so under FP standards? Étienne Dolet (talk) 06:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – The obverse includes what appears to be an image of a repeat of Franklin's kite experiment (and a flying topless lady at right), and I'm wondering what that has to with Hawaii. Sca (talk) 14:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good question Sca- The design of National Bank Notes was uniform with the exception of the section of lettering on the front identifying the name of the bank and its location (sometimes called the "tombstone") and the charter number engraved in the border (and in large numbers across the center reverse). For most states and some territories the reverse side left oval contained the state or territorial coat of arms. Since Hawaii was annexed in 1898 and the 1882 series in essence ended in 1902, an official territorial coat of arms was never added. (Idaho, for example, stated issuing in the 1860s and there are two versions of the territorial seal). The remaining territories (like Hawaii) simply had two versions of the eagle in the ovals. Hope that helps...--Godot13 (talk) 18:08, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Still puzzled. But, well, it's different. Colors seem somewhat reminiscent of some Confederate notes. Sca (talk) 18:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The purpose of having all the notes with the same basic design was familiarity and recognition. They were backed by the Treasury and were legal tender in any state or territory. The early vignettes were meant to be "educational" in nature (particularly the reverse).--Godot13 (talk) 18:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2016 at 02:25:27 (UTC)
Reason
One of the most important late works by W. S. Gilbert, this expanded retelling of H.M.S. Pinafore for children teaches them such things as how one goes about singing a song to the moon (Step one: During the intermission evening, stay in your cabin composing it on your guitar...) It's a very fun read, and, while we currently lack an article on the book itself, this image is used to represent it in H.M.S. Pinafore and Gilbert and Sullivan
I think it might give a false impression about the borders to an average user (technically they are still part of the page), but wouldn't oppose on that basis. Brandmeistertalk19:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]