Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/September-2020

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.


	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

African helmeted turtle

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2020 at 17:48:16 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Illustrates article well. Not appropriate as the lead image, but shows the way the animal retracts its neck and legs.
Articles in which this image appears: African helmeted turtle, Pelomedusidae
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:48, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to decide if the dirty shell is a problem. On the one hand, they do swim, so it would be possible to get a washed-off shell in the wild. On the other hand, the shell isn't the main focus. Charles, can you give your thoughts? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 23:53, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm far from an expert, but I understand that details of the shell are important for identification. I doubt we'd feature a picture of a beetle with dirty elytra. I don't think this is particularly suitable as an infobox image, and I'm not completely clear on the extent to which it adds significantly to the article -- which is not to say that I don't think it's a good picture! Lots of personality. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- This is not presented as an identification image, more behaviour i.e. the feet. October is a dry month in South Africa, so sand and dust everywhere - I could have gone and given him a brush down... Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Charlie could airbrush the dirt off. – Sca (talk) 12:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Support, then Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 21:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~null~~ Support – 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
null – 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn't reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Five-striped palm squirrel

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2020 at 17:43:14 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Northern palm squirrel
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute little fellow, isn't he? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 19:48, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nice picture, not a bad little article, appreciate that you can see the stripes and get an idea of habitat. Any idea of subspecies? Josh Milburn (talk) 07:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The experts do not agree about the number/validity of subspecies. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support – We're so used to seeing pix of gray squirrels and red squirrels that this sporty-looking striped squirrel is an interesting change. (Target article could be more detailed as to diet and habits, though.) – Sca (talk) 12:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Five-striped palm squirrel (Funambulus pennantii).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kee Mar College, 1860s

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2020 at 05:42:50 (UTC)

Reason: A lovely image of a historic women's college. Part of a lovely progression in the article where you can see the trees grow in at the college over the decades. The college ceased to exist in 1911, so there's limited chances to document it.
Articles in which this image appears: Kee Mar College
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Anonymous photographer, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 05:42, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looks tilted... --Janke | Talk 06:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought that it did, but I had some trouble telling as there's a small amount of what I presume is lens distortion as well. I'm uploading a -.3 degree rotation; if you want to have a poke, here's the uncropped restored version. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 06:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – It does look tilted; either that, or perspective is distorted. Detail might not be too bad for the 1860s, but huge featureless foreground detracts from EV regarding this obscure institution. – Sca (talk) 12:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
question Why is the infobox image not more valuable for the article? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:18, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Charlesjsharp: I'll be honest: I do like that one better, but it is a little smaller, largely because it's cut from a frankly bizarre and awful choice to make it an oval print, and I figured adding some extra sky was fine, but I didn't want to use excessive speculation on the actal grounds. Might touch it up a bit more and nominate it instead. Withdraw. I'll be back! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 23:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cephalanthus occidentalis occidentalis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 17:03:08 (UTC)

Reason: Recently featured unanimously on Commons. It bears a resemblance to something I have seen recently, but I cannot remember exactly what it was...
Articles in which this image appears: Cephalanthus occidentalis
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
Creator: The Cosmonaut

Support as nominator – MER-C 17:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, the photo could go viral Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alas, Charles' joke has already taken the crown. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 17:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Causing widespread pandemic panic. – Sca (talk) 14:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support – 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ©Geni (talk) 21:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cephalanthus occidentalis occidentalis1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nanook of the North

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2020 at 04:55:08 (UTC)

Original – Nanook of the North (1922), a American silent documentary film by Robert J. Flaherty. In the tradition of what would later be called salvage ethnography, Flaherty captured the struggles of the Inuk man named Nanook and his family in the Canadian Arctic.

Reason: An important documentary that was selected as one of the first 25 films inducted in the National Film Registry, this is yet another film that is worth watching for its achievements.
Articles in which this image appears: Nanook of the North
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Robert J. Flaherty

Support as nominator – GamerPro64 04:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Important milestone in cinematography, the first ever docudrama... --Janke | Talk 06:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Nanook of the North.webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ZenFone 6

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2020 at 23:03:55 (UTC)

Reason: One of the most detailed vector illustrations of a smartphone on Wikipedia.
Articles in which this image appears: Asus ZenFone 6, Asus ZenFone
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Electronics
Creator: 17jiangz1

Support as nominator – 17jiangz1 (talk) 23:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is incredibly impressive, but I'm not quite sure I understand why it exists. What's the advantage of this over a photograph, given any change from the real object lessens its encyclopedic value in representing that object? It's an amazing work, but I don't understand why it exists. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 01:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Static photos of electronic devices are inherently uninteresting and lack EV.
– Sca (talk) 13:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per above. Uninteresting, drab, thus fails criterion #3. --Janke | Talk 12:18, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose . Lack EV. --Gnosis (talk) 04:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ashta Matrika

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 12:24:14 (UTC)

**Original** – The Goddess Ambika (here identified with: Durga or Chandi) leading the Eight Matrikas in Battle Against the Demon Raktabija, Folio from a *Devi Mahatmya* - (top row, from the left) Narashmi, Vaishnavi, Kumari, Maheshvari, Brahmi. (bottom row, from left) Varahi, Aindri and Chamunda, drinking the blood of demons (on right) arising from Raktabija's blood and Ambika.

Reason: Quality image
Articles in which this image appears: Ajima, Brahmani, Chamunda, Devi Mahatmya, Kali, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Matrikas, Newa art, Puranas, Raktabīja, Vahana, Varahi
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Unknown Nepali painter; collection by Los Angeles County Museum of Art

Support as nominator – ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was going to complain about the resolution, then I saw the original size. About 500 dpi is ample. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 15:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 15:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 14:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ashta-Matrika.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nelly Martyl

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 15:06:25 (UTC)

Reason: A fine Reutlinger photograph. Some minor damage to the right edge of her dress, otherwise able to be restored to a pretty pristine state. Restored on the article creator's request.
Articles in which this image appears: Nelly Martyl
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Jean Reutlinger, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 15:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I like how you've managed to hold the detail in all that almost-white. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – What a great picture. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – As the article creator, I'm thrilled that the image on the biographical article will be of such good quality. Those Reutlinger arrays in Commons include some real treasures, but they're often damaged and need restoration. This is a great example of what's possible. – Penny Richards (talk) 15:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although the photographer was a apparently of the "shoot at f1.2 so only one eye is in focus" school.©Geni (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is that transitional period between the long-exposure film of the mid to late 19th century that required people to use devices to hold themselves still, and the more spontaneous poses allowed by faster film. I've noticed a bit of a nosedive in quality around the 1910s when they realise they can shoot faster with a bit of loss of quality, and are using it to shoot the same sort of compositions people are used to from long exposures, before film quality catches back up and compositions grow more interesting. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 23:45, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 14:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Nelly Martyl by Jean Reutlinger (Image 10715).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Constance Baker Motley

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2020 at 00:25:55 (UTC)

Reason: Quite a fine image, freely licensed, and from a somewhat under-represented period for free licensing. Also, she's clearly important. The light line on her shirt appears to be a reflection from her bracelet.
Articles in which this image appears: Constance Baker Motley
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Walter Albertin (World Telegram & Sun); restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 00:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support (t · c) buidhe 00:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 11:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 14:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mrs. Constance B. Motley, first woman Senator, 21st Senatorial District, N.Y., raising hand in V sign.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

University of Wrocław

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2020 at 17:42:25 (UTC)

Reason: great quality, already FP on commons
Articles in which this image appears: University of Wrocław
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Jar.ciurus

Support as nominator – Andrei (talk) 17:42, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Arty photo, but low EV due to the emphasis being on the river and the dusk light. Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Gimmicky. Looks oversaturated. Przepraszam. – Sca (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that was addressed and discussed on Commons already (with no objections) --Andrei (talk) 21:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ale WP:FPC isn't Commons. – Sca (talk) 13:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it is a big community of photo experts --Andrei (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mamoru Shigemitsu signs the Japanese Instrument of Surrender

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2020 at 11:15:16 (UTC)

Reason: High quality with an encyclopedic value
Articles in which this image appears: 1945, Surrender of Japan, Japanese Instrument of Surrender, Mamoru Shigemitsu, Richard K. Sutherland, Toshikazu Kase
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War II
Creator: Stephen E. Korpanty

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 11:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Widely known photo. What's new about it? – Sca (talk) 12:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Good EV, but the photo needs restoration before it meets the FP criteria. The composition is also not great, but that's true of most of the photos of this ceremony. Nick-D (talk) 23:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess I'll get it. Way easier than my current project. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 15:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Found the original TIFF - the JPEG is a very low-quality one - and started restoring. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 03:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Nick-D, Sca, and TheFreeWorld: I've done a full restoration. See what you think! Also, I Support Alt 1 Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 07:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support restored version, oppose original (t · c) buidhe 17:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 1. MER-C 18:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 1. Strong EV and a competently executed photo. As noted above, there don't seem to be any good photos of this historic ceremony, possibly due to the location where it took place (the deck of an operational battleship cramped with large numbers of VIPs and sailors). Nick-D (talk) 00:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 1. --Gnosis (talk) 03:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mamoru Shigemitsu signs the Instrument of Surrender, officially ending the Second World War.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barsana Holi Festival.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2020 at 16:13:40 (UTC)

Reason: Recently featured unanimously on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Lathmar Holi
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology
Creator: Narender9

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
question Having read the article, I don't see where pink smoke is relevant! Charlesjsharp (talk)
- @Charlesjsharp: I believe that's the pigment powders floating through the air - Holi is perhaps best known in the West, at least, for the coloured powders thrown about as part of the celebration, not that that's particularly well-explained in Holi, and barely touched upon in Lathmar Holi - I think it's presumed to be an "everyone knows this" sort of thing, when it shouldn't be. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 22:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Problems with the article aside, I'm inclined to Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 22:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 14:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Barsana Holi Festival.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ljubljana Marshes Wheel with axle

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2020 at 08:48:22 (UTC)

Reason: Ljubljana Marshes Wheel with axle is oldest wooden wheel yet discovered (around 5,150 years old - nomination 2020) and in very good shape.
Articles in which this image appears: Wheel
FP category for this image: Engineering and technology/Others
Creator: Petar Milošević

Support as nominator – Petar Milošević (talk) 08:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great VI, but not a FP quality composition unfortunately. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
comment date was pre the publication of IntCal20 so may need updating.©Geni (talk) 21:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's limited composition possibilities for a unique museum specimen like this. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 08:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
©Geni Date is up to Wiki article, if you know something more update. Charlesjsharp We are talking about oldest wheel, put in dark space, under the glass. This is not bird outside. --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment For me, a picture taken from in front of the exhibit would be better, not the side. The image on the 9GAG website shows a better POV, but the ideal would be from slightly higher up. Even better would be to ask permission from the museum to take a shot for Wikipedia with the glass removed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Charlesjsharp I can't find it on 9GAG, link ? Yes, glass off and tripod allowed, my wish. --Petar Milošević (talk) 12:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here you go [1] Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)ta[reply]
I have similar shot, but i don't like composition. I choose that above - diagonal. Also its more about wheel than axle, which should take good % of photo. --Petar Milošević (talk) 19:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Parked boats at Anjarle Creek

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 01:21:58 (UTC)

Reason: This photo is a great visualization of the Indian monsoon. It shows fishing boats, the lifeblood of the village Anjarle, lashed together tightly to protect from the unforgiving monsoon, whose clouds are visible behind the boats. It is already a featured picture on Wikimedia Commons and appeared as picture of the day on the Wikimedia Commons and the Bengali Wikipedia.
Articles in which this image appears: the FA India WP oldest country FA (to turn 16 this month) has had this picture in its Geography section for over a year now.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Natural_phenomena/Others
Creator: Dey.sandip

Support as nominator – I-82-I | TALK 01:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 08:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 14:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This looks oversaturated to me, and many of the white areas such as the roof of the frontmost boat are overexposed to featureless white. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Please nominator, you need to link to most relevant articles. See FP guidelines. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Image does not add value to articles and is incorrectly categorized for FP. This is not a natural phenomenon. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support It has been in the FA India in the Geography section—as an illustration of the monsoon—since September 2019. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 06:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well it doesn't illustrate a monsoon. The description is speculative and I have removed it from the article on India. Adam Cuerden DreamSparrow TheFreeWorld Fowler&fowler «Talk» Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry but I've reinstated the picture in India where the tradition is to add, remove, or replace pictures only during the annual or biannual, image discussions. Without that, a page with > 40K views a day would be in a mess. The next discussion is in (this upcoming) November. What exactly would be an illustration of an Indian monsoon anyway? An ordinary, anonymous, downpour, indistinguishable from those in Bangladesh, Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, ...? The pictures need to illustrate specific text. (Until last September we had two pictures showing the monsoon (part of a daily rotating template in Geography): File:NDRF in Bihar Flood 2.jpg and an FP File:Agasthiyamalai range and Tirunelveli rainshadow.jpg, both illustrating the text there.) I'm the primary author of India. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 15:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've already pinged Charlesjsharp, but would @Adam Cuerden, David Eppstein, and Mydreamsparrow: like to be judges in November? It would really help us out. We can work out something whereby you won't be importuned unduly. I will soon write a proposal on Talk:India and can ping you. Best, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 15:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Fowler&fowler: Insofar as I can. I'm not Indian, and can't speak on things like, say, which Indian monuments or cities most deserve pictures, but I can try and advise as far as I can. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 17:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: I'm not either. Nationality or citizenship is not a requirement, might even be a plus for NPOV. I think we need advice on an image's quality more than its appropriateness for the text. ( Recently, for example, someone objected to a picture File:Kurta traditional front sandalwood buttons.jpg (of our son, now an adult, but 15 at the time) as a part of an illustration of Kurta, a collarless shirt. The objection was: "Extremely low quality image. Low relevance. Probably violates children Personality rights. Just not an image for a FA." It is those kinds of issues I'm not very good with. Thanks, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 17:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is this 'tradition is to add, remove, or replace pictures only during the annual or biannual, image discussions.' User:Fowler&fowler? This is news to me as a regular Wikipedia editor. Please explain asap. As far as I know, any editor can edit any article at any time. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC). And to revert my good faith edit may be considered edit-warring which is not recommended. As a matter of fact, these boats are NOT secured ready for a monsoon. Any seaman could tell you that. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Parked boats at Anjarle Creek.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Fly Duet from Orphée aux enfers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 03:57:51 (UTC)

Reason: A really fun - and particularly daring for 1887! - photo of a ridiculous scene in a ridiculous opera. The wings are drawn on in multiple versions of this image; I presume the real ones didn't photograph well with the long shots of the time. Really encyclopædic for the scene.
Articles in which this image appears: Orpheus in the Underworld, Jeanne Granier
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE, I suppose
Creator: Atelier Nadar, restored by Adam Cuerden. The alternate was based on my work, but colourised by Wilfredor.

Support either as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 03:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support original, but Oppose Alt 1 well-executed colorized version Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know there is a lot of speculation with the colors, maybe it is a destructive version because we will never know exactly how it looked (since the colors of the garments can change even in events of the same work), but thank you very much for proposing it Wilfredor (talk) 12:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support original. MER-C 18:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original - DreamSparrow ^Chat 14:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support original (t · c) buidhe 18:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Atelier Nadar - Fly scene from Offenbach's Orphée aux enfers with Jeanne Granier as Eurydice and Eugène Vauthier as Jupiter, 1887 revival, wide-angle shot.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tenthredo scrophulariae larva

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 06:16:09 (UTC)

Reason: Stunning and terrifying detail. Saw this on Commons. It impressed me and set of all my insect phobias. But I am tampering them down. It was focusstacked from 28 images, so that every part of it is crystal clear and terrifying, especially the sharp pointy claws and fat white body. ...But, that said, this is one of the best insect photos I've seen, and we want it here, and I won't let my phobia of maggots and grubs stop that.
Articles in which this image appears: Tenthredo scrophulariae
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Animals/Insects, specifically, the figwort sawfly
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 06:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good example of where the nominated image should not be in the infobox. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aye. Infoboxes are a... useful tool, but not perfect at getting everything about something. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 03:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:00, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - well executed, lots of detail still present in the whites. MER-C 18:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 14:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support (t · c) buidhe 17:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Tenthredo scrophulariae larva - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orange-winged parrots

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 08:51:33 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Adds value to article.
Articles in which this image appears: Orange-winged parrot
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orange? – Sca (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When they fly! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason I've developed a deep-seated aversion to orange ones in recent years. – Sca (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks rather good. Could wish for more resolution, though; I can't think when I last wasn't able to count the individual feather barbs on your photos, but wildlife photography is all about taking chances when they come. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 08:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Resolution wise a bit tight considering the loose crop and especially if one is to focus only on one of the birds. What does the second bird add? --Muhammad(talk) 12:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn't reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schloss Favorite, Ludwigsburg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 08:58:29 (UTC)

Reason: Great composition, high EV, high IQ
Articles in which this image appears: Schloss Favorite, Ludwigsburg
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Julian Herzog

Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 08:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the second image is best, don't know why the first one is there at all as the trees block the building. This one is a lovely image, but doesn't add as much value to the article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I think Charles is right about the tree-image, so I tossed it, per the slightly terrible WP:SOFIXIT redirect. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 08:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On the one hand, the actual photo is gorgeous if zoomed in. It'd be an absolutely stunning poster. On the other hand, it's not really the most thumbnail-friendly photo. Perhaps {{CSS image crop}} to the rescue? But I think I'll Support on merits. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 08:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Beautiful image, used prominently and appropriately (if not as the lead image) on its article. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per David - this very attractively illustrates this building and its surrounds. Nick-D (talk) 11:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Schloss Favorite Ludwigsburg 2017 01.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to Places/Panorama instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Large red damselfly female

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 08:59:36 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Large red damselfly
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support and make as part of a set with existing FP File:Large red damselfly (Pyrrhosoma nymphula) male Dry Sandford.jpg. MER-C 18:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That is absolutely lovely. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 08:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 14:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is a bit harsh and I would have preferred a more lateral view --Muhammad(talk) 12:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Large red damselfly (Pyrrhosoma nymphula) female fulvipes 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Migrant spreadwing female

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 09:08:52 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Illustrates article well, particularly as it shows the two-toned wing spots
Articles in which this image appears: Lestes barbarus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp, focused perfectly, and even a rather artistic composition. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 08:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 14:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Adam --Muhammad(talk) 12:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Migrant spreadwing (Lestes barbarus) female Belgium.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Green-Meldrim House

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 08:04:52 (UTC)

Reason: There was a previous nomination back in 2012, but I don't understand the arguments. William Waud was an artist hired to document the American Civil War. There's no photographs of Sherman's occupancy of the Green-Meldrim House (or I'm horribly mistaken), but we have on-the-spot documentation of the most important event to happen there. I can't see how that isn't exceptionally valuable.
Articles in which this image appears: Green–Meldrim House, William Waud
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/History/USA_History
Creator: William Waud, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 08:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support (t · c) buidhe 17:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historical context. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I think the historic usage gives this enough EV. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Entrance Hall of Mr Chas. Green's house, Savannah Ga, now occupied as Head Quarters by Gen Sherman.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Volkswagen I.D. series Buggy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 07:47:34 (UTC)

Reason: high quality. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Volkswagen I.D. series
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Land
Creator: Alexander Migl

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 07:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. One of nine tiny thumbnail images on its article. Where is the EV? —David Eppstein (talk) 16:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to have to second David. It's a great image, but it's barely this side of used. It's the equivalent of a gallery image, and can't be an FP until that changes. If the model enters production, gaining its own article, it'll naturally gain prominence and will then be featureable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 03:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Looks like a common garden variety promotional pic. Lacks visual interest. (I say this despite a certain fondness for green VWs.) [2]
– Sca (talk) 14:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Evan0512 (talk) 02:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Macracantha

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2020 at 18:14:54 (UTC)

Reason: Featured on Commons. Hope you're not scared of spiders...
Articles in which this image appears: Macracantha
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Arachnids
Creator: Rushenb

Support as nominator – MER-C 18:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support either. MER-C 17:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support original – the spider isn't centered but the asymmetrical leaves filling the left side works. Bammesk (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support either Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 00:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edit 1 but would prefer a slightly cooler version. This one seems a bit too warm --Muhammad(talk) 08:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ I did not vote for this at Commons FP because of oversaturation and off-centre crop. Neither was corrected. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1 Much better. Oppose original Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden, Muhammad Mahdi Karim, and Charlesjsharp: Could you please indicate, which version(s) you support. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1 --Janke | Talk 05:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1 – DreamSparrow ^Chat 03:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Macracantha arcuata - Curved Spiny Spider (8550192839) by Rushen edit.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leland D. Melvin

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2020 at 19:38:19 (UTC)

Reason: A previous nomination of this astronaut had 3 supports, this version is sharper and has more pixels, it's also the lead image.
Articles in which this image appears: Leland D. Melvin
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: Robert Markowitz, NASA

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 19:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:56, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is an excellent example of NASA astronaut portraits, and a very good portrait of the subject. I really liked the previous FPC of Mr Melvin with his dogs (as a great portrait with lots of character, and potential to be used in a wide range of articles), and would also support it again if it was renominated. Nick-D (talk) 23:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 00:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 09:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great pic (t · c) buidhe 23:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 03:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Leland Melvin.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beulah Ream Allen receiving the Medal of Freedom

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2020 at 22:29:19 (UTC)

Reason: While not perfect, depicts a key event insofar as it shows her being recognised for her service
Articles in which this image appears: Beulah Ream Allen
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others, since we don't exactly have a category for non-research medicine, and she was a civilian capture.
Creator: Unknown photographer, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 22:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 09:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 16:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — high EV (t · c) buidhe 23:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 03:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Beulah Ream Allen receiving the Medal of Freedom (1945).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Masjid Nabawi The Prophet's Mosque, Madina

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2020 at 07:16:49 (UTC)

Reason: Good quality, symmetry and high EV of one of Islam's holiest places.
Articles in which this image appears: Al-Masjid an-Nabawi, Culture of Saudi Arabia, General Presidency of Haramain
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Muhammad Mahdi Karim

Support as nominator – Muhammad(talk) 07:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This image makes one of Islam's holiest places look like a drab office building with some spires stuck on top. It's a clear depiction of the layout of the place, but surely a low point of view hiding the buildings and streets behind, such as File:Gumbat Khizra, Masjid Nabvi, Madina Munawara - panoramio.jpg, or an elevated but oblique view, such as File:Flickr - omar chatriwala - Dawn breaks.jpg, would be more inspiring? —David Eppstein (talk) 16:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- PS also at a technical level there is visible grain in the sky and visible chromatic aberration at the edges of the buildings near the left and right sides of the shot. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
oppose I agree, pov Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per above, messy, uninspiring composition. --Janke | Talk 10:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's been a lot of commentary over recent years about the over-development around the sacred Islamic sites in Saudi Arabia. This photo clearly illustrates the results, and does a good job of presenting this site as it actually is, not as it used to be and is marketed. Looking at satellite imagery on Google maps shows that this site now sits in the middle of an grid of ugly buildings with yet more under construction. As such, the EV (which is a major consideration for an an encyclopedia) is strong, and much stronger than pictures which misrepresent the site. Nick-D (talk) 11:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Nick-D. EV goes above prettiness here (t · c) buidhe 23:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 04:09, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 03:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – This image appears to have been taken from a hotel about 1000ft away. A better camera and lens from the same location can achieve much better images. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 11:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kaaba

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2020 at 07:27:31 (UTC)

Reason: A difficult place to get good pictures of with a ban on cameras inside the mosque. I managed to get this from a nearby building. Kaaba literally means cube and the angle on this does a great job of showing that.
Articles in which this image appears: Kaaba, Qibla observation by shadows, Muhammad
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Muhammad Mahdi Karim

Support as nominator – Muhammad(talk) 07:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The pixel count is quite low for FPC, but I'm willing to overlook that given its extreme encyclopedic value as the stable lead image of its topic, the striking visual quality of the shot, the difficulty of getting this shot, and the image degradation that likely comes just from all the air across the distance needed to get this shot. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too small and too little definition. 09:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Quality issues - small, blurry at lower left & right. Why would it be difficult to shoot a better photo? --Janke | Talk 10:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I have heard the same argument since 2008. Here, here and and here. --Muhammad(talk) 12:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - OK, apparently not easy to take photos there. Struck my oppose. --Janke | Talk 15:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 23:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The pixel count is quite low. --Gnosis (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- It meets the criteria of 1500 pixels. --Muhammad(talk) 03:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 03:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – A better camera and lens from the same location can achieve a much better result. This appears to be a cell phone image. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 11:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Ouch. I'll wait for the better Camera and better lens. FWIW, this was taken on a Canon 7D with a 400mm L Lens --Muhammad(talk) 13:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Langtang National Park

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2020 at 12:20:20 (UTC)

Reason: Quality Image.
Articles in which this image appears: Langtang National Park, Langtang, List of natural monuments in Nepal
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: Q-lieb-in

Support as nominator – ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The "artsy" star trails distract to such an extent that the EV suffers. Besides, it appears this is a composite, not a real image. Strong (editing?) artifacts at top of mountains. --Janke | Talk 15:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Janke. Gimmicky. – Sca (talk) 14:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because this photo is likely edited to have fast-moving stars appeared, and also the blue sky. Evan0512 (talk) 00:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Foreground lighting (bright enough, from a single non-moving point of illumination, to have crisp visible shadows) seems highly inconsistent with star exposure (roughly 1.5 hours judging by the length of the star trails). —David Eppstein (talk) 01:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Christoph Willibald Gluck's Alceste

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2020 at 00:30:47 (UTC)

Reason: I think this predates anything else in WP:FP/THEATRE by about 50 years, which makes it unique for us, and starts to bring in a whole new generation of theatre and artists. Plus, it's one of Gluck's major operas, which makes it quite valuable. It wasn't an easy restoration - the paper was somewhat filthy - but I did my best.
Articles in which this image appears: Alceste (Gluck), François-Joseph Bélanger, et al
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator: François-Joseph Bélanger, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 00:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – that's a ton of restoration!, nice. Bammesk (talk) 03:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bammesk: I've kind of been enjoying this year. Bunch of things rejected in previous years as too much work to ever do are getting done. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 14:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive restoration work, has EV (t · c) buidhe 23:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:48, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 03:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:François-Joseph Bélanger - Set design for Gluck's Alceste.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Survey of Palestine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 15:36:08 (UTC)

Reason: Meets all 8 of the WP:FP? criteria, and represents the highest resolution 1:100,000 Survey of Palestine fully combined map available anywhere. The stitching of the 24 underlying maps has been done to a high technical standard, as has the georeferencing. The map is of great encyclopaedic value, representing the territory of Mandatory Palestine immediately prior to its dissolution into Israel and the Palestinian territories and the dispersion of the Palestinian refugees.
Articles in which this image appears: Survey of Palestine
FP category for this image: Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
Creator: Survey Department of Palestine (stitched by DutchTreat)

Support as nominator – Onceinawhile (talk) 15:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Caution: this image is 450 MB and 300 Mpx. MER-C 17:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – EV? – Sca (talk) 22:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sca: I have amended the nom text above to make this clear. Onceinawhile (talk) 13:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see the point in this technical exercise in cartography. – Sca (talk) 21:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sca: This has created the only highly detailed map of Mandatory Palestine, and it happens to be at the exact moment of its dissolution. Do you also not see the point of these four FPs: File:Daedongyeojido-full.jpg, File:Turgot map of Paris - Norman B. Leventhal Map Center.jpg, File:USPostRoadMap1804.jpg, and File:Waldseemuller map 2.jpg? This historical and encyclopaedic import of this map is on par with all of those. Onceinawhile (talk) 21:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion: how about a JPEG version with a file size of about 70 or 80 MB? It's not easy to open at 424MB. Bammesk (talk) 02:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Created a JPEG version with a white background. This file is around 60 MB. Let me know if you want any other changes - DutchTreat (talk) 10:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, much easier to open (with some additional minor artifacts at magnification). I did some spot checks and couldn't find any serious alignment problems. The rectangular grids don't always line up, but that seems to be a feature of the maps, not necessarily an alignment problem. I am Ok with supporting either the JPEG or the PNG, one is easier to open and the other has higher quality. I wait to see if others find any problems. Bammesk (talk) 03:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Bammesk (talk) 19:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now - the stitching is not quite right in places. MER-C 16:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MER-C: would you mind pointing out exactly where? Just in case there is a misunderstanding here, e.g. with the intended grid-shift at the top. Onceinawhile (talk) 21:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's a bunch of discontinuities across y~18800, particularly near the left hand side. These are mostly contours that are duplicated or terminate. If the map is actually like that, then please say so and I will withdraw my oppose. MER-C 16:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C:, @Onceinawhile: - Please find a close-up view of the coordinates (040, 070) at pixels y~18800. The original scans for 14Rafa and 17Nitsana have mismatched contour lines. For example, the diagonal line from SW to NE at (040,078) is only part of 17 (lower image), not part of 14 (upper image):

{{{annotations}}}

Survey of Palestine 1942-1958 1-100,000 14Rafa, close-up at 040,075

{{{annotations}}}

Survey of Palestine 1942-1958 1-100,000 17Nitsana, close-up at 040,075

- DutchTreat (talk) 13:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair enough. MER-C 14:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 18:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:06, 13 Sep!ltember 2020 (UTC)
Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have produced a new version of the file with tighter cropping. Due to the size > 100 MB, I am unable to update the original version. Should it be uploaded under a new file name and the nomination process continue with this new file? - DutchTreat (talk) 20:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- You want commons:User:Rillke/MwJSBot.js Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 02:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Cuerden Thanks for the tip. I uploaded improved versions using User:Rillke/bigChunkedUpload.js which is based on User:Rillke/MwJSBot.js - DutchTreat (talk) 12:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Survey of Palestine 1942-1958 1-100,000 sheet index georef.png --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Della H. Raney

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 22:39:39 (UTC)

Reason: A fairly charming image of the first African American nurse in the U.S. Army Nurse Corps. Rather like her wooden name plaque and it's clever positioning in the photo as almost a caption.
Articles in which this image appears: Della H. Raney
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military
Creator: Uncredited photographer, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 22:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice image. (t · c) buidhe 23:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – how about brightening the left side a bit? It looks to me like a scanning problem rather than a photographic or lighting feature. Bammesk (talk) 03:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bammesk: I thought it was lighting, but it is a bit extreme, so I've lightened it a bit. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 23:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was shot with a flash and that's the primary light source (see her neck, also the wall and window trims have a similar shadow). Flash doesn't leave a rectangular gradient on one side (left side), so the dark left side is not a feature of the photo. It can be corrected fully IMO. . . . Here are some possibilities of what could have happened: 1-the photo wasn't scanned properly (it can happen with flatbed scanners, similar to photocopy machines), or 2-something was partially impeding the path of the flash light on the left side (and vertically), this is unlikely given the well-defined shadows on the wall trims, also unlikely given nothing is impeding the path of the lens, or 3-the negative wasn't handled/developed properly. In any case, the dark left side is not a feature of the photo, so I think it is Ok to fix it. Bammesk (talk) 01:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bammesk: There's a definite shadow on the left side of her face. That makes me presume the lighting isn't centred. I could be wrong, but I believe a flash at the time would be the old flash pans, not one on the camera. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 02:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it is not an on-camera flash, and it is positioned slightly off center. Nonetheless the primary source is one flash, placed near the camera and above the lens. Bammesk (talk) 02:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With slight reluctance, Done. Given the clear reflection off of the one box in the upper mid-left, the upper left-centre clearly should be lighter than the bit left of that, though. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 03:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely an improvement. At first I thought her name was some kind of watermark :-) Bammesk (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a cheeky addition of a wooden nameplate, and I kind of.... really like it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 05:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good EV, and an interesting portrait. I'm also a fan of the nameplate, and want one just like it for my desk at work. Nick-D (talk) 11:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd suggest getting your own name. One just like it would be odd, unless you were a nurse of the same name and rank. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 19:45, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Dunno, it probably wouldn't be the weirdest thing my colleagues have seen me do. Nick-D (talk) 04:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:39, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:45, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 03:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Capt. Della H. Raney, Army Nurse Corps, who now heads the nursing staff at the station hospital at Camp Beale, CA - NARA - 535942.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roan antelope

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2020 at 16:01:29 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Roan antelope
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support prefer the composition of your other picture in the article but the quality of this one is much superior --Muhammad(talk) 06:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support with a quibble Every photograph in the article has the head facing the camera. It would be nice to have a profile on the article. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 18:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sorted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

THanks, Charles! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 12:38, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 03:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Roan antelope (Hippotragus equinus koba).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Balkan fritillary

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2020 at 16:08:44 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large images. FP on Commons. Illustrates article well, showing top side and underside of wings.
Articles in which this image appears: Balkan fritillary
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 19:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 03:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Balkan fritillary (Boloria graeca balcanica) Bulgaria.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:Balkan fritillary (Boloria graeca balcanica) underside Bulgaria.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Financial District, Manhattan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:06:34 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC recently where it was featured unanimously. Lead image, high detailed panorama.
Articles in which this image appears: Financial District, Manhattan
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
Creator: King of Hearts

Support as nominator – MER-C 17:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, thanks for the nom. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, interesting and detailed. Question: The left edge of the vessel (about 1/4th from right) looks a bit chopped off compared with the other blurry boat edge(s) - is this an artifact of stitching? --Janke | Talk 18:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The horizontal rays of light represent the distance the boat traveled during the exposure. It probably traveled slower / stayed for longer on the left than the right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – KoH, there are a couple of odd (sharp) transition lines in the water at around x=7400, I annotated it on Commons. They don't look real to me, are they? Bammesk (talk) 18:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now Great photo but have to oppose till image is corrected by KoH. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles, please be "specific" about what you want corrected, in your own words, so there is no ambiguity. Particularly since you are opposing. Bammesk (talk) 19:28, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same stitching issue as you pointed out. Very easy for KoH to rectify as he's an active participant on Commons. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bammesk and Charlesjsharp: I have verified on my source images that this is real and not a stitching error. Maybe it's caused by bright lights creating rays of light and dark? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks, it's a great photo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:06, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lower Manhattan from Governors Island August 2017 panorama.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justice K. K. Usha

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:06:39 (UTC)

Reason: Good quality photograph of a notable judge.
Articles in which this image appears: K. K. Usha
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others
Creator: Mydreamsparrow

Support as nominator – DreamSparrow ^Chat 17:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – she looks much younger than her age. Bammesk (talk) 19:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unfortunately a poorly composed photo though, both considering the backgound and her expression. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, her expression and the background are of a judge in India, both are realistic for the subject. Bammesk (talk) 19:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm not the biggest fan of the crop, but it's at least a standard one. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 21:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Encyclopedic value is there, and the somewhat supercilious expression is appropriate for her position. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as David, the expression is befitting. I'd prefer the background to be clearer if someone can clone out the 'thingy' --Muhammad(talk) 06:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support although I too want the lamp to disappear. MER-C 18:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Justice K. K. Usha.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lujiazui station

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 02:23:25 (UTC)

Reason: It is a Shanghai Metro Line 2 station near several famous buildings in Lujiazui, but also high quality and a bit of night mode photo.
Articles in which this image appears: Line 2 (Shanghai Metro), Shanghai Metro, Pudong, Lujiazui, Lujiazui station
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator: Evan0512

Support as nominator – Evan0512 (talk) 02:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. At thumbnail sizes the black-on-black makes only the metro sign legible. Even at larger sizes, where the detail in the black can be seen well enough, there is nothing interesting in that detail. And this is not used in any articles, so encyclopedic value is not evident (and it would need to be in stable use for some time before any nomination, so adding it now is not going to help). —David Eppstein (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close, with an explanation The image is decent enough, although those poles in the foreground are unfortunate, but I suspect there's better times to get this - sunset, say, or twilight, that'll give just enough light to bring everything up a bit. An Iphone is a pretty decent camera for a phone, but it comes out a bit grainy at low light levels as most digital cameras do. The real blocker is that it's not actually in any of the articles listed, and I'm not sure why you listed it as being in them - are they meant as suggestions? Unfortunately, it has to be used on English Wikipedia in order to be accepted and while there's exceptions for being stable in an article before nomination (like being the only photo in an article, or being so clearly important that no-one sensible would remove it), I don't think this hits any of them. If it's not in any articles, it's not a featured picture. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 03:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Inky, jumbled, lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sándor Vay

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 21:31:54 (UTC)

Reason: Last nomination barely failed to reach quorum. The 1910s were a bit of a photographic nadir - I think the ability to get faster photographs won out over quality for a while, and prints weren't amazing, but this is decent for the time, even having a bit of character to it. Think it's a rather good image from a very underrepresented country, and depicts someone who is both an important Hungarian poet and writer, and an important person in LGBT history.
Articles in which this image appears: Sándor Vay
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Unknown, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator - Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 21:31, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sándor Vay - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sherman's March to the Sea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 00:07:48 (UTC)

Reason: A high-resolution copy of a high-quality copperplate engraving. Copperplate is engraved at a literal microscopic level.
Articles in which this image appears: Alexander Hay Ritchie, F. O. C. Darley, Marching Through Georgia, Sherman's March to the Sea +5
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American Civil War
Creator: Alexander Hay Ritchie after F.O.C. Darley; restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 00:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very dramatic engraving (t · c) buidhe 06:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Fine engraving. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie - Sherman's March to the Sea.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A baby hamster

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 16:50:37 (UTC)

Reason: Good quality, high EV, good composition and lighting. Already FP in Commons and Persian language Wikipedia.
Articles in which this image appears: Syrian hamster breeding & Syrian hamster variations
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Mydreamsparrow

Support as nominator – DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because the hamster is mirrored on the floor. Evan0512 (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- But it is not negatively affecting the EV I feel. Please explain your concern, if I could rectify it, it would be better right ? DreamSparrow ^Chat 04:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cannot be FP as not in article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Charlesjsharp, I removed the first article name from the Nom page. The picture is related to breeding and the image is still there in the article. Have a look. DreamSparrow ^Chat 09:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oppose Does not add EV to breeding article, nor variations article as it is not described as a variation. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Oppose – Gimmicky, reducing EV. – Sca (talk) 12:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't see how a more artistic rendition hurts this in any way. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 22:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I don't like the two colour background and I find the reflection worrying. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - high quality and encyclopedic depiction, I don't see anything wrong with a creative layout (indeed the mirror allows more of the animal to be seen TSP (talk) 15:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Hogan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 10:49:08 (UTC)

Reason: Lawrence Hogan, a Republican, played a crucial role in bringing down Richard Nixon. See also previous nomination at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lawrence Hogan
Articles in which this image appears: Lawrence Hogan
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Collection of the U.S. House of Representatives; restored by Coffeeandcrumbs

Support as nominator – --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 10:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Totally unremarkable B&W mugshot. – Sca (talk) 12:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but have a look at the left dimple/ nose-mouth crease. It looks a little odd. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 22:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am only seeing natural deep crease. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 01:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edges look a bit odd, due to grain, I think. It's nothing major. Think I'm just more used to older filmstock. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 11:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 07:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Evan0512 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lawrence Joseph Hogan (restoration).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Henties Bay

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 11:56:32 (UTC)

Reason: High quality and high EV
Articles in which this image appears: Henties Bay
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator: Arne Müseler

Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 11:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support would prefer a slight denoise on the sky --Muhammad(talk) 13:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Enough encyclopedic value and conveys a clear sense of the place. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Henties bay.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chandra Shumsher Jang Bahadur Rana

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 15:48:32 (UTC)

Reason: Quality image
Articles in which this image appears: Chandra Shumsher Jang Bahadur Rana, Chandrapur Municipality, List of foreign recipients of the Légion d'Honneur by country
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya; Restoration by CAPTAIN MEDUSA

Support as nominator – ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but I'd suggest also uploading a JPEG version, as they thumbnail better, and switching the nomination to it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 06:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for the advice ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I could see maybe tweaking the levels of this as well. Don't stretch it the whole way, but I'd raise the white point a bit if I were you. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 23:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MER-C 18:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sir Chandra Shumsher Jang Bahadur Rana (restoration).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert le diable: The Ballet of the Nuns

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 06:17:12 (UTC)

Reason: A high-quality lithograph of probably the most popular scene of Robert le diable: The one in which the spirits of perverted nuns all seduce the "hero". ...Yeah, this opera's morality is really off. Don't worry, the "hero" decides not to sell his soul to his father, who is a devil, because he hears a song that reminds him of his mother, but only after his love interest arrives to tell him he's going to get everything he wants either way! (He was still going to sign the contract, just to make sure, though, before he heard the music)
Articles in which this image appears: Robert le diable, Ballet of the Nuns, Henri Duponchel
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator: Pierre-Luc-Charles Cicéri, Eugène Cicéri, et al.; restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 06:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful lithograph + restoration (t · c) buidhe 20:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Strong Oppose~~ Support. Evan0512 (talk) 22:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Evan0512, could you provide specific reasons for your "strong oppose"? --Paul_012 (talk) 00:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. another great work by Mr. Cuerden. --Gnosis (talk) 00:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - there is a large blurry smear on the top of the rightmost large foreground arch. It's bad enough that it is visible on the file description page. MER-C 10:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @MER-C, Gnosis, Evan0512, Mydreamsparrow, and Buidhe: Should be fixed now. Sorry. It was a slip of the healing brush. Luckily, I had the levels adjustments saved, so could just apply them to the original and copy over the patch. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 23:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support. MER-C 09:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pierre-Luc-Charles Cicéri - Eugène Cicéri - Philippe Benoist - Adolphe Jean Baptiste Bayot - Décorations de théâtre, Robert le diable, 3e act.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coronation of Tribhuvan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 12:54:37 (UTC)

Reason: Quality image
Articles in which this image appears: Tribhuvan of Nepal
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility
Creator: Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya; Restoration by CAPTAIN MEDUSA

Support as nominator – ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's some minor damage (whiter areas that don't appear to reflect any real objects) to the blurry part of the left background, but it's quite minor and I doubt anyone but me would even notice. It's a stunning photo. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 11:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Hm. Actually, right edge is rather dark. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 03:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 00:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Crowning Tribhuvan of Nepal (1911) (restoration).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mohiniyattam

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2020 at 12:42:00 (UTC)

Reason: A quality image of an Indian classical dance.
Articles in which this image appears: Mohiniyattam
FP category for this image: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Creator: Shagil Kannur

Support as nominator – Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Dancer not identified. – Sca (talk) 13:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sca, the dancer is unknown and unimportant here. This photo was taken from a dance competition. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's an established policy not to promote photos of anonymous individuals on the Main Page. – Sca (talk) 16:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then, nothing to say. This is a fine example of Indian classical dance. Thus, it should be promoted. The performer, a school student, was one among the many participants in a dance competition, not a well known dancer at all. The highlight here is the Indian classical Dance. I hope you consider the above facts.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And let me see where the above mentioned policy has been stated.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Identity is not required for FP. And FWIW, FP and POTD are not the same thing --Muhammad(talk) 07:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such policy. The guidance is the instructions on top of this page and the FP criteria, and neither mention the main page. Bammesk (talk) 03:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown but Support. Evan0512 (talk) 20:07, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For a dance, a still photo (particularly a still photo only showing a small part of the body) is not terribly educational. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – the article is about the dance so a full body photo would have more EV (encyclopedic value), FP criterion #5. This photo would meet the EV criterion if the article described (say in a paragraph) this upper body pose, but I don't see that in the article. Also as a technical critique, the crop is too tight on top and left side. Bammesk (talk) 03:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stowage of the British slave ship Brookes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 09:51:20 (UTC)

Reason: An unusual image I found looking through the table of the events leading up to the United States Civil War. According to our article on the relevant ship in question, the image is not 100% accurate as it contains omissions and the ship in question is known to have hauled for more slaves then depicted here, however the same article states with citations that "...this image has become the one most used to depict conditions on a slave ship" and asserts that the image "...has become an iconic image of the inhumanity of the slave trade." Submitting here for community consideration of an FP star.
Articles in which this image appears: Brooks (1781 ship), La Bouche du Roi (artwork), Slave Trade Act 1788, Slave ship, Thomas Clarkson, Triangular trade, Zong massacre
FP category for this image: Not entirely sure; best options I think would be Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water, Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others, or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Diagrams, depending on how its viewed.
Creator: Plymouth Chapter of the Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade

Support as nominator – TomStar81 (Talk) 09:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - needs restoration. There's also some text on the bottom left that is cut off. MER-C 10:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @MER-C: The text is physically cut off in the original, as you can see in the uncropped version. I'm not sure we would want to do a restoration on this as most of the damage is from tears, folds, and stains, rather than dust and scratches that you get on a photograph. Making such substantial alterations might affect the image's role as a verifiable historical document. But I would defer to Adam's opinion on this. Kaldari (talk) 21:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Looks like the text is cut off on LOC original too. From seeing several illustrations on Wikisource, the text plausibly contains authorship information so it's important to the historical veracity of the document. MER-C 16:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
...What's the source of this? It doesn't appear to be the LoC. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 06:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Adam Cuerden: Since the LoC seems to have the physical document (they have 2 different photographs of it and it's housed in their Rare Book Reading Room) and I wasn't able to find another high res version on the internet that pre-dates ours, I imagine the uploader acquired it directly from the LOC Prints and Photographs Division (which you can do for a fee). I've done this myself for images where the version on the LoC website was sub-standard, e.g. File:The Horse in Motion high res.tiff. This would also jive with the uploader's comment: "Higher resolution from LoC source". Unfortunately, the uploader retired many years ago, so we can't find out from them directly. Kaldari (talk) 21:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'd like to know a lot more about this particular print and its significance. The Brooks illustration was widely-distributed in a wide assortment of versions; the first, by Elford in 1788, seems to have simply been a single plan view with accompanying text (possibly this); this was then added to in a 1789 broadsheet. Many subsequent versions were made, of which this undated version seems to be one. Given it's not in great condition, I'd want some reason to believe it is both a historically-significant printing, and that no copy of this printing in better condition can be found. TSP (talk) 15:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emu

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 10:32:41 (UTC)

Reason: About to be featured unanimously on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Emu
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Muhammad(talk) 07:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 02:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kaldari (talk) 21:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Emu 1 - Tidbinbilla.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eurasian nuthatch

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 10:36:00 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons last year. This bird is 14 cm long, so difficulty is harder than it seems.
Articles in which this image appears: Eurasian nuthatch
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Isiwal

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support but needs a selective denoise on the tail --Muhammad(talk) 07:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 02:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as the good lead image of a featured article. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Kleiber Sitta europaea-0447.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]