Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.
For promoted entries, add '''Promoted Example.ogg''' --~~~~ to the bottom of the entry, replacing Example.ogg with the file that was promoted.
For entries not promoted, add '''Not promoted''' --~~~~ to the bottom of the entry.
For entries demoted, add '''Demoted Example.ogg''' --~~~~ to the bottom of the entry.
Use variants as appropriate, e.g. with a large set of files, all of which pass, '''Promoted all''' is fine, but if one of them didn't pass for some reason, make sure that's clear.
Support although the seemingly "whistle sound" at 6 sec is tiny a bit distracting, this is a 100 old sound of Wagner's famous work.--Caspian blue04:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Either we need a good performance or a historic one by a famous orchestra. This is neither. There should be some good material available for such a famous piece. Has anyone looked? Berlin Phil? Furtwängler? --Kleinzach01:26, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Do you imagine that there is the slightest likelihood that the Berlin Philharmonic or DGG would grant public domain for a recent recording? Get serious. Edison (talk) 04:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the technical issue; the noise seems like a result from transferring sound to computer with a wire. Unless this distracting noise is reduced, my vote would remain here.--Caspian blue02:42, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The original file [1] is free of the weird artifacts introduced by the "restoration." I would support the original file without the odd sounds introduced in the background. Edison (talk) 04:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]