This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2018 January 7. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result of the discussion was: delete . I'm going to quote Primefac here: "if the creator of the draft cannot find enough sources to pass AFC after three declines, an AFD, a DRV [actually a REFUND], and more AFCHD bludgeoning than I can count, then the subject of the draft is likely not notable". It is insane to keep debating this in forum after forum. No amount of semantics can cause this to be acceptable to our standards with the current state of sourcing. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)