The result of the debate was No Consensus/Default keep. A majority of the comments favor keeping; however, this would not prevent a deletion closure if there were an obvious personal attack present. Despite the efforts of those opposing this page, I see no clear personal attacks. Hyperbolic and baseless criticism of Wikipedia as an organization, to be sure, but no personal attacks. Strangely enough, maintaining baseless criticism on the page of a banned user benefits Wikipedia -- the encyclopedia gains by taking the high moral ground in these cases, remaining an open and transparent forum by so doing. For this reason, I believe the majority is (at the very least) not wrong on the merits, and that there are compelling commendable reasons to keep the page. Xoloz 03:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)