- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. The MfD instructions are clear that already-operating process pages should not be nominated here. If you want to close or modify the process, please open an RfC. (For the record, I have not been involved in any of the RfCs that led to the creation of WP:AARV, nor have I participated in the board itself since it was established.) RL0919 (talk) 22:52, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Previous closure attempt:
The result of the discussion was: Speedy procedural keep: Wrong venue. Policies and noticeboards are not deleted, they are marked as historical if consensus to do so is found at a central non-MfD venue. This is described at WP:MfD and has previously happened, for example, to WP:RFC/U, which has been deprecated by a discussion at the VPP (permanent link). Feel free to move all existing comments to a proper discussion venue and fix the CENT link afterwards. I'm personally not interested, I'm just closing this as clearly inappropriate. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Indeed. For an even more pertinent example, see Wikipedia:Administrator review. – wbm1058 (talk) 20:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- (Note: It has been correctly noted that I may not be the ideal closer for this discussion, which is why I'm thankful for the endorsement by wbm1058 who has at least not participated in the sub-RFC about the creation of this board. I guess an ideal uninvolved closer would not have participated in WP:RFA2021/P at all? I don't know.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
In the hope of someone uninvolved coming to the same conclusion (it's not that hard in my opinion), I'm re-opening this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|