The result of the discussion was Keep. Consensus is clear that this MfD was premature and that the status of the project should be revisited at a later time. As for the claim that the page is "clearly is a violation of the GNU license", that is undoubtably wrong. The GFDL license covers sharing and attribution, it has absolutely nothing to do with open access to editing. BJTalk 03:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)