Some have suggested that this closure is worthy of discussion and that it would be helpful to have a few words from the closing bureaucrat. I am happy to oblige.
I think, notwithstanding that this RfA falls (numerically at least) within an area where bureaucrats are granted a certain amount of discretion in determining the will of the community, that this discussion demonstrates a consensus that Bsadowski1 should be an administrator on this project. In particular, I note that (as has been the case for a number of years) there remains no consensus as to whether a proven record of article-writing ability should be a prerequisite for a contributor to Wikipedia to become an administrator.
General concerns about "inexperience", though valid, cannot be given the same weight as (for instance) inflammatory exchanges with other users or prior misuse of tools. The concerns of those opposing are general and examples of improper behaviour (whether as an editor of this project or sysop of another) are noticeably lacking. Looking at the comments of those supporting this candidate, his contributions and status on other projects were clearly an influential factor.
I have to say that I do not regard this as a particularly borderline call. I think the discussion between users in this RfA shows a consensus for promotion. WJBscribe (talk) 23:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]