- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
Bureaucrat note: There is sufficient support in this RfA to merit promotion. Although there is concern in the opposition about the overuse of huggle and the lack of experience in content and consensus building, there are no examples of incivility, misunderstanding of policies, abuse of huggle, edit warring, drama, controversy; nor are there problematic answers to the RfA questions - and in the few instances of questionable actions (specifically reverting edits and dealing with anonymous editors), Camw has admitted to making mistakes and shown a willingness to learn and improve.
I have also read the many editors weighing in as neutral. Their concerns are no different really than those in opposition, but they are decidedly neutral, and not in opposition. Kingturtle (talk) 15:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)