all proposed
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.
On this case, [N] Arbitrators is/are recused and [N] is/are inactive, so [N] votes are a majority.
Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.