 | The Closing Administrators would like to thank everyone for their contributions in this unique Request for Comment process. We appreciate the civil discussions and commend User:Coffee and User:The Wordsmith for their moderation of the entire process. After a thorough review of the editors' comments on the twenty-two proposals, we find that Proposal 1 has the strongest community consensus, and therefore close the RfC in support of Proposal 1.
As per the criteria of the RfC, these discretionary sanctions will immediately apply to the eleven articles listed in the Introduction section, and will be implemented, broadly construed, for other articles in the subject area. It may be overturned only by another widely published full 30-day RfC, a consensus of administrators at WP:AE, or by decree of the Arbitration Committee. Katietalk 20:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC) |
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. Parts of this page relate to genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. Restrictions placed: 12 March 2016 |
This is a Request for Comment, conducted under discretionary sanctions issued by the Arbitration Committee, concerning how to indicate the scientific views on the safety of genetically modified crops for human consumption. The WordsmithTalk to me 14:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)