Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reliable sources/Noticeboard page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9: 31 days

WT:RSN

Note: This talk page is for discussing issues relating to the Noticeboard itself. Please post questions or concerns about sources and articles on the main project page: WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.
For the record, the discussion about creation of this noticeboard took place here and here.

Section sizes in Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

Section size for Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard (39 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	629	629
RfC: Universe Guide	850	7,197
Background (Universe Guide)	997	997
Survey (Universe Guide)	5,350	5,350
RFC on The South African	3,188	7,036
Survey (The South African)	2,474	2,474
Discussion (The South African)	1,374	1,374
RFC Jewish Chronicle	779	113,942
Note (Jewish Chronicle)	1,928	1,928
Survey (Jewish Chronicle)	71,535	71,535
Background (Jewish Chronicle)	1,585	1,585
Discussion (Jewish Chronicle)	38,115	38,115
Is this Retracted LA Magazine Article a reliable source?	34,204	45,404
Summary of the Discussion so far	7,312	7,312
mynewsla.com and parent company CalNews, Inc	3,888	3,888
The Jerusalem Post	10,914	10,914
MassLive	2,720	2,720
Japan Forward	4,006	4,006
Are these sources appropriate for a private limited company specialising in Fintech?	3,679	3,679
Raksha-anirbeda	1,336	1,336
Blocking Yahoo Finance and MSN so the actual articles have to be cited	3,304	3,304
Reliability of Airfleets.net	3,528	3,528
RfC: using photos of record labels from Discogs?	436	16,192
Survey (Discogs images)	9,077	9,077
Discussion (Discogs images)	6,679	6,679
PulseSports	3,587	3,587
Showbiz411	1,726	1,726
AccuWeather for damage estimates	7,661	7,661
Grenada	8,219	8,219
IGI Global	10,368	10,368
Buzzer Blog	1,234	1,234
mustreadalaska.com	792	792
Good source?	901	901
Car brochures	1,913	1,913
Status of the Burji people according to self-published book by Gollo Huka Liben	14,901	14,901
LionhearTV	1,297	1,297
Unicode Discussions on Nivkh alphabets	1,991	1,991
www.ace.hu	889	889
National Football Teams	956	956
Total	276,322	276,322

This noticeboard has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Jasper Jackson (8 February 2017). "Wikipedia bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source". The Guardian.
Will Oremus (9 February 2017). "Wikipedia's Daily Mail Ban Is a Welcome Rebuke to Terrible Journalism". Slate.
Kalev Leetaru (10 February 2017). "What Wikipedia's Daily Mail 'Ban' Tells Us About The Future Of Online Censorship". Forbes.
Samantha Cole (2 October 2018). "Wikipedia Bans Right Wing Site Breitbart as a Source for Facts". Vice.
Omer Benjakob (9 January 2020). "Why Wikipedia Is Much More Effective Than Facebook at Fighting Fake News". Haaretz.
Oliver Darcy (24 July 2020). "Wikipedia administrators caution editors about using Fox News as source on 'contentious' claims". CNN.
Nishant Kauntia (30 November 2020). "The Edit Wars: How Wikipedia earned the ire of the Hindu Right". The Caravan.
Samuel Breslow (29 September 2022). "Wikipedia's Fox News Problem". Slate (magazine).
Asaf Elia-Shalev (18 June 2024). "ADL faces Wikipedia ban over reliability concerns on Israel, antisemitism". Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
"Wikipedia declares Anti-Defamation League 'unreliable' on Israel, antisemitism: Report". Middle East Eye. 18 June 2024.
"Wikipedia declares ADL 'unreliable' on Israel-Palestine conflict, antisemitism". i24NEWS. 19 June 2024.
Josh Marcus (19 June 2024). "Why Wikipedia just labeled a top Jewish civil rights organization 'unreliable' on the Israel-Palestine crisis". The Independent.
"Wikipedia labels prominent Israeli civil rights organization 'unreliable' on Israel-Palestine crisis, antisemitism". Arab News. 19 June 2024.
Rob Eshman (June 19, 2024). "Wikipedia called the ADL 'unreliable.' It's a wake-up call the civil rights organization badly needs". The Forward. Retrieved June 20, 2024.
David Goldman (June 20, 2024). "Wikipedia now labels the top Jewish civil rights group as an unreliable source". CNN. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
Daniela Ginzburg (June 21, 2024). "Wikipedia deems ADL 'unreliable' due to Israel advocacy". Jewish News Syndicate. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
Aaron Bandler (June 21, 2024). "Wikipedia Editors Label ADL Only Reliable for Antisemitism When "Israel and Zionism Are Not Concerned"". The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
Aya Youssef (June 23, 2024). "Palestine's battle against Zionist editing on Wikipedia". Al Mayadeen. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
Rob Eshman (June 24, 2024). "'Does anybody question the NAACP?': The ADL head thinks Wikipedia is biased. Is he right?". The Forward. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
Etan Nechin (June 25, 2024). "Leading Jewish Groups Rebuke Wikipedia's 'Attack' on ADL's Credibility on Antisemitism". Haaretz. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
"Jewish orgs pen letter to Wikipedia condemning ADL ban". The Jerusalem Post. June 25, 2024. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
"'Concern, dismay' by Wikipedia attack on ADL, 43 Jewish groups tell Wikimedia Foundation". Jewish News Syndicate. June 25, 2024. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
Shiryn Ghermezian (June 25, 2024). "Jewish Groups Lambast Wikipedia for Its 'Attack on ADL's Credibility' About Antisemitism, Israeli-Palestinian Conflict". Algemeiner Journal. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
Asaf Elia-Shalev (June 25, 2024). "Wikipedia's operator rebuffs Jewish groups' call to override editors on ADL trustworthiness". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
Ben Brasch (26 June 2024). "Wikipedia defends editors deeming Anti-Defamation League 'unreliable' on Gaza". The Washington Post.