Avillia, this case is about whatever Arbcom decides it's about. And Morven is a member of Arbcom. Thatcher131 17:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I was not aware that Morven was a arbitrator and I apologize. I didn't want things to have more tension created by a arbitrator taking offense to the comment removal for some reason or another. As for "This case is about BluAardvark", some comments like Lethe's are going more into the entire situation than the specific issue of Blu; The situation is relavant, but not the topic. While I'm all for it if the scope of this case is to be expanded to include MSK and such, right now it's not, and I was hoping to keep this from turning into something similar to the ANI thread which reached 200kb. --Avillia (Avillia me!) 18:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Does Raul, a potential litigant, get to define the parameters of the case so that they do not include him? How convenient for him. -lethe talk + 18:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Go make a motion. --Avillia (Avillia me!) 20:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- OK. -lethe talk + 20:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]