Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Dbachmann (2)

I think the best solution to this conflict is if all parties talk it out. Those who accuse the other party of incivility are also themselves guilty of incivility. I have requested a mediator to look into it. Radiant_>|< 23:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is this RfC valid? Isn't Talk:Rajput a more appropriate place for discussions concerning the content of that particular article? --Ghirlandajo 10:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Doubtful; there is little evidence that more than one user tried to resolve the dispute with DAB and failed. But that's hardly the point, because the way the RFC is worded and written, people are going to be unlikely to comment on it anyway. Yes, the logical place would be the talk page, and the logical step would be to ask the MedCom. Radiant_>|< 12:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Seconded. --Ghirla | talk 12:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Seconded. I saw the debate only recently (I am not a contributor to the article in question) and have been trying to put some order in place thru the respective talk page, and by talking to the individuals (both sides) on their talk pages (It appeared to me as a triangular debate: DAB being the initial third corner). I think there are precedents of individuals trying to resolve this, but I doubt if it worked (Ref: Talk Archives). Agree to flag this to MedCom. --rgds. Miljoshi | talk 14:02, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


charges by sisodia is baseless for he and his freinds are themeselves engaged in editing on many pages without assigning any reason and trying to push their view.specially on kshatriya page these users don't even care their language and are abusive of sort on others.I would ask them to limit their presence on Rajput page and refrain from editing on kshatriya page as these users have blocked the proper views to emerge on kshatriya page pushing their unilateral view that rajpus are kshatriya and being highly intolerant towards other viewpoints. Thanks satyamev jayate —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.177.144.177 (talkcontribs)