This page is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
Conclusions of the discussion in a nutshell:
All disambiguators that are not part of the rocket or missile's official name should be in parenthesis
Titles for missiles should follow one of the following formats (in order of preference)
[Name] or [Official designation], if one is not available (eg. V-2)
[Name] (missile) or [Official designation] (missile) if one is not available, and the other is ambiguous (eg R-36 (missile)
Local designations should take precedence over NATO and US Library of Congress designations (eg. R-7 Semyorka not SS-6 Sapwood)
Families of rockets should be disambiguated using (rocket family) where there is ambiguity
Individual rockets should be disambiguated using {rocket) when there is ambiguity
When there is no ambiguity, there should be no disambiguation
Within families of rockets, there should be an overview article for the family, and individual articles for the variants
In some cases subgroups of a family can have their own articles
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
A vote on implementing this proposal is now being conducted, please see this page for voting and continued discussion
This is a discussion page for the proposal to bring rocket article namings into some form of a logical order.
Moves to bluelinked articles are over redirect unless otherwise stated. I'm not entirely sure whether "rocket" or "(rocket)" should be the standard disambiguator, but either way is an improvement. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk08:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
I prefer ()'s, you can use the link trick. BTW, Saturn (rocket family) covers two major designs and several redesigns, so simply (rocket) doesn't seem appropriate. Maury (talk) 03:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)