Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2016-11-04/Discussion report

Discuss this story

The Pending Changes report doesn't make clear an important feature of the current RfC: it proposes to lower the auto-accept level for PC2 from the pending changes reviewer usergroup to the recently introduced extended-confirmed usergroup: so about 29,000 editors (extended-confirmed) would be able to edit PC2-protected articles without review compared to about 6,000 (PC-reviewers) under the previous PC2 framework: Noyster (talk), 21:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The community tech team rocks :-) Keep up the excellent work. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I commented after an editor made a statement on one of the help pages, and I got the response that the Internet Archive actually does a better job of archiving web sites than I thought. I still believe the story should say "links to the relevant pages, if any".— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]