How does this compare to the rest of the encyclopedia? About 58% of assessed, non-list articles are marked as stubs. I'd be curious about the evidence that Limnology/Oceanography coverage suffers any more than any other topic area. czar 02:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)more than 60% of the articles assessed for the project remain in poor condition and lack references, have poor structure, or are missing crucial information.
← Back to Recent research