Wilson v. Libby | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
Full case name | Valerie Plame Wilson and Joseph C. Wilson IV v. I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Jr., Karl C. Rove, Richard B. Cheney, Richard L. Armitage and John Does Nos. 1–10 |
Argued | May 9, 2008 |
Decided | August 12, 2008 |
Citation | 535 F.3d 697 |
Case history | |
Prior history | 1:06-cv-01258, 498 F. Supp. 2d 74 (D.D.C. 2007) |
Subsequent history | Cert. denied, 557 U.S. 919 (2009). |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | David B. Sentelle, Karen L. Henderson, Judith W. Rogers |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Sentelle, joined by Henderson |
Concurrence | Rogers |
Plame affair |
---|
Timeline |
People |
Criminal investigation |
Context |
Wilson v. Libby, 498 F. Supp. 2d 74 (D.D.C. 2007), affirmed, 535 F.3d 697 (D.C. Cir. 2008), was a civil lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on 13 July, 2006, by Valerie Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, IV, against Richard Armitage (individually) for allegedly revealing her identity and thus irresponsibly infringing upon her Constitutional rights and against Vice President of the United States Dick Cheney, Lewis Libby, Karl Rove, and the unnamed others (together) because the latter, in addition, allegedly "illegally conspired to reveal her identity."[1][2] The lawsuit was ultimately dismissed.