Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District | |
---|---|
Argued February 24, 1993 Decided June 18, 1993 | |
Full case name | Zobrest et al. v. Catalina Foothills School District |
Docket no. | 92-94 |
Citations | 509 U.S. 1 (more) 113 S. Ct. 2462; 125 L. Ed. 2d 1 |
Case history | |
Prior | 963 F.2d 1190 (9th Cir. 1989) |
Holding | |
A school must continue to provide an interpreter under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act even if the child elects to attend a religious school; to do so does not violate the Establishment Clause. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by White, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas |
Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Souter (in full); Stevens, O'Connor (Part I) |
Dissent | O'Connor, joined by Stevens |
Laws applied | |
Establishment Clause; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act |
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, 509 U.S. 1 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a school must continue to provide an interpreter under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act even if the child elects to attend a religious school; to do so does not violate the Establishment Clause.