 An LED display resembling the cartoon character Ignignokt from Aqua Teen Hunger Force giving the finger as seen in Cambridge, Massachusetts | |
| Date | January 31, 2007 |
|---|---|
| Time | 8:05 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. |
| Location | Boston, Cambridge, and Somerville, Massachusetts, U.S. |
| Type | Guerrilla marketing campaign, falsely identified as a bomb threat |
| Organised by | Interference, Inc. |
| Participants | Peter "Zebbler" Berdovsky |
On the morning of January 31, 2007, the Boston Police Department and the Boston Fire Department mistakenly identified battery-powered LED placards depicting the Mooninites, characters from the Adult Swim animated television series Aqua Teen Hunger Force, as improvised explosive devices (IEDs), leading to a massive panic. Placed throughout Boston, Massachusetts, and the surrounding cities of Cambridge and Somerville by Peter "Zebbler" Berdovsky and Sean Stevens, these devices were part of a nationwide guerrilla marketing advertising campaign for Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters.
The massive panic led to controversy and criticism from U.S. media sources, including The Boston Globe, Los Angeles Times, Fox News, The San Francisco Chronicle, The New York Times, CNN, and The Boston Herald. Some ridiculed the city's response to the devices—including the arrests of the two men hired to place the placards around the area[1]—as disproportionate and indicative of a generation gap between city officials and the younger residents of Boston, at whom the ads were targeted. Several sources noted that the hundreds of officers in the Boston police department or city emergency planning office on scene were unable to identify the figure depicted for several hours until a young staffer at Mayor Thomas Menino's office saw the media coverage and recognized the figures.
After the devices were removed, the Boston Police Department stated in its defense that the ad devices shared some similarities with improvised explosive devices, with them also discovering an identifiable power source, a circuit board with exposed wiring, and electrical tape. Investigators were not mollified by the discovery that the devices were not explosive in nature, stating they still intended to determine "if this event was a hoax or something else entirely". Although city prosecutors eventually concluded there was no ill intent involved in the placing of the ads, the city continues to refer to the event as a "bomb hoax" (implying intent) rather than a "bomb scare".[2]
Reflecting years later, various academics and media sources have characterized the phenomenon as a form of social panic.[3][4] Gregory Bergman wrote in his 2008 book BizzWords that the devices were basically a self-made form of the children's toy Lite-Brite.[5] Bruce Schneier wrote in his 2009 book Schneier on Security that Boston officials were "ridiculed" for their overreaction to the incident.[6] In his 2009 book Secret Agents, historian and communication professor Jeremy Packer discussed a cultural phenomenon called the "panic discourse" and described the incident as a "spectacular instance of this panic".[3] In a 2012 article, The Boston Phoenix called the incident the "Great Mooninite Panic of 2007".[4] A 2013 publication by WGBH wrote that the majority of Boston youth thought that the arrests of two men who placed devices were not justified.[1]
- ^ a b Cite error: The named reference
sixyearswas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "Turner, 2nd firm to pay $2 million over scare". NBC News. Associated Press. February 5, 2007. Archived from the original on April 20, 2013. Retrieved December 19, 2007.
- ^ a b Cite error: The named reference
jeremypackerwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ a b Cite error: The named reference
mooninitepanicwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
gregorybergmanwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
schneieronsecuritywas invoked but never defined (see the help page).