Abaoji

Emperor Taizu of Liao
遼太祖
Emperor of Khitan Empire
Emperor of the Liao dynasty
Reign916–926
PredecessorDynasty established
SuccessorEmperor Taizong
BornAbaoji (阿保機)
872
Died6 September 926(926-09-06) (aged 53–54)
Burial
Zuling Mausoleum (祖陵, in present-day Bairin Left Banner, Inner Mongolia)
SpouseEmpress Shulü Ping
Names
Family name: Yēlǜ (耶律)
Khitan given name: Ābǎojī (阿保機)
Sinicised given name: Yì (億)
Era dates
Shence (神冊): 916–922
Tianzan (天贊): 922–926
Tianxian (天顯): 926
Regnal name
Emperor Dasheng Daming Tian (大聖大明天皇帝)
Posthumous name
Emperor Dàshèng Dàmíng Shénliè Tiān (大聖大明神烈天皇帝),
shortly Emperor Tiān (天皇帝 or 天帝)
Temple name
Tàizŭ (太祖)
HouseYelü
DynastyLiao
FatherYelü Saladi
MotherXiao Yanmujin
Abaoji
Traditional Chinese阿保機
Simplified Chinese阿保机
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinĀbǎojī
Wade–GilesA-pao-chi
Emperor Taizu of Liao
Traditional Chinese遼太祖
Simplified Chinese辽太祖
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinLiáo Tàizŭ
Wade–GilesLiao T'ai-tsu
Yelü Yi (sinicised name)
Chinese耶律億
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinYēlǜ Yì

Abaoji (872 – 6 September 926), posthumously known by his temple name as the Emperor Taizu of Liao,[1] was a Khitan leader and the founding emperor of the Liao dynasty of China, ruling from 916 to 926.[2] He had a sinicised name, Yelü Yi; some sources suggest that Abaoji's family name, Yelü, was adopted during his lifetime,[2] although there is no consensus amongst historians on this point.

Abaoji was born in 872 in Southern Mongolia and had a turbulent childhood. His grandfather was killed in a conflict between tribes, and his father and uncles fled. He was hidden by his grandmother for his safety. He became khagan of the Khitans on 27 February 907, [3]and was subsequently enthroned as emperor in 916, proclaiming his own era name.[4] He died on 6 September 926.[3] He was responsible for the conquest and unification of all of Inner Mongolia, northern China and southern Manchuria.[2] After the Khitan Empire became the Liao dynasty in 942, Abaoji was posthumously considered a Liao emperor.

  1. ^ Hoiberg 2010, p. 1
  2. ^ a b c Dupuy & Dupuy 1986, p. 276
  3. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Wittfogel was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ Twitchett & Tietze 1994, pp. 60, 62