This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2016) |
Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders | |
---|---|
Argued February 26, 2008 Decided June 9, 2008 | |
Full case name | Allison Engine Co., Inc., et al., v. United States ex rel. Roger L. Sanders and Roger L. Thacker |
Docket no. | 07-214 |
Citations | 553 U.S. 662 (more) 128 S. Ct. 2123; 170 L. Ed. 2d 1030 |
Case history | |
Prior | United States ex rel. Sanders v. Allison Engine Co., 471 F.3d 610 (6th Cir. 2006) |
Subsequent | Law amended by Congress in 2009 with the effect of reversing the decision |
Holding | |
Plaintiffs under the False Claims Act must demonstrate that the defendants intended to deceive the government, not simply that government money was used to pay the claim. Decision of the appeals court vacated and case remanded. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Alito, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 | |
Superseded by | |
Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 |
Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders, 553 U.S. 662 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that plaintiffs under the False Claims Act must prove that the false claim was made with the specific intent of inducing the government to pay or approve payment of a false or fraudulent claim, rather than merely defrauding a contractor.[1] Congress overruled this decision with the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009.[2]