Animal testing

"Animal research" redirects here. For other uses, see Animal studies (disambiguation). For the journal, see Animal Research (journal).
See also: Vivisection

A Wistar laboratory rat
DescriptionAround 50–100 million vertebrate animals are used in experiments annually.
SubjectsAnimal testing, science, medicine, animal welfare, animal rights, ethics

Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research, and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals, such as model organisms, in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. This approach can be contrasted with field studies in which animals are observed in their natural environments or habitats. Experimental research with animals is usually conducted in universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, defense establishments, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to the industry.[1] The focus of animal testing varies on a continuum from pure research, focusing on developing fundamental knowledge of an organism, to applied research, which may focus on answering some questions of great practical importance, such as finding a cure for a disease.[2] Examples of applied research include testing disease treatments, breeding, defense research, and toxicology, including cosmetics testing. In education, animal testing is sometimes a component of biology or psychology courses.[3]

Research using animal models has been central to most of the achievements of modern medicine.[4][5][6] It has contributed to most of the basic knowledge in fields such as human physiology and biochemistry, and has played significant roles in fields such as neuroscience and infectious disease.[7][8] The results have included the near-eradication of polio and the development of organ transplantation, and have benefited both humans and animals.[4][9] From 1910 to 1927, Thomas Hunt Morgan's work with the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster identified chromosomes as the vector of inheritance for genes,[10][11] and Eric Kandel wrote that Morgan's discoveries "helped transform biology into an experimental science".[12] Research in model organisms led to further medical advances, such as the production of the diphtheria antitoxin[13][14] and the 1922 discovery of insulin[15] and its use in treating diabetes, which had previously meant death.[16] Modern general anaesthetics such as halothane were also developed through studies on model organisms, and are necessary for modern, complex surgical operations.[17] Other 20th-century medical advances and treatments that relied on research performed in animals include organ transplant techniques,[18][19][20][21] the heart-lung machine,[22] antibiotics,[23][24] and the whooping cough vaccine.[25]

Animal testing is widely used to aid in research of human disease when human experimentation would be unfeasible or unethical.[26] This strategy is made possible by the common descent of all living organisms, and the conservation of metabolic and developmental pathways and genetic material over the course of evolution.[27] Performing experiments in model organisms allows for better understanding the disease process without the added risk of harming an actual human. The species of the model organism is usually chosen so that it reacts to disease or its treatment in a way that resembles human physiology as needed. Biological activity in a model organism does not ensure an effect in humans, and care must be taken when generalizing from one organism to another.[28][page needed] However, many drugs, treatments and cures for human diseases are developed in part with the guidance of animal models.[29][30] Treatments for animal diseases have also been developed, including for rabies,[31] anthrax,[31] glanders,[31] feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV),[32] tuberculosis,[31] Texas cattle fever,[31] classical swine fever (hog cholera),[31] heartworm, and other parasitic infections.[33] Animal experimentation continues to be required for biomedical research,[34] and is used with the aim of solving medical problems such as Alzheimer's disease,[35] AIDS,[36] multiple sclerosis,[37] spinal cord injury, many headaches,[38] and other conditions in which there is no useful in vitro model system available.

The annual use of vertebrate animals—from zebrafish to non-human primates—was estimated at 192 million as of 2015.[39] In the European Union, vertebrate species represent 93% of animals used in research,[39] and 11.5 million animals were used there in 2011.[40] The mouse (Mus musculus) is associated with many important biological discoveries of the 20th and 21st centuries,[41] and by one estimate, the number of mice and rats used in the United States alone in 2001 was 80 million.[42] In 2013, it was reported that mammals (mice and rats), fish, amphibians, and reptiles together accounted for over 85% of research animals.[43] In 2022, a law was passed in the United States that eliminated the FDA requirement that all drugs be tested on animals.[44]

Animal testing is regulated to varying degrees in different countries.[45] Animal testing is regulated differently in different countries: in some cases it is strictly controlled while others have more relaxed regulations. There are ongoing debates about the ethics and necessity of animal testing. Proponents argue that it has led to significant advancements in medicine and other fields while opponents raise concerns about cruelty towards animals and question its effectiveness and reliability.[46][47] There are efforts underway to find alternatives to animal testing such as computer simulation models, organs-on-chips technology that mimics human organs for lab tests,[48] microdosing techniques which involve administering small doses of test compounds to human volunteers instead of non-human animals for safety tests or drug screenings; positron emission tomography (PET) scans which allow scanning of the human brain without harming humans; comparative epidemiological studies among human populations; simulators and computer programs for teaching purposes; among others.[49][50][51]

  1. ^ ""Introduction", Select Committee on Animals in Scientific Procedures Report". UK Parliament. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
  2. ^ Liguori, G., et al. (2017). "Ethical Issues in the Use of Animal Models for Tissue Engineering: Reflections on Legal Aspects, Moral Theory, 3Rs Strategies, and Harm-Benefit Analysis" (PDF). Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 23 (12): 850–62. doi:10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0189. PMID 28756735. S2CID 206268293.
  3. ^ Hajar R (2011). "Animal Testing and Medicine". Heart Views. 12 (1): 42. doi:10.4103/1995-705X.81548. ISSN 1995-705X. PMC 3123518. PMID 21731811.
  4. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference RSM2015 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Cite error: The named reference NRCIOM was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  6. ^ Cite error: The named reference Nature2007 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference NRCIOMb was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ Cite error: The named reference HLAS2011 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  9. ^ Cite error: The named reference IOM1991 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  10. ^ Cite error: The named reference nobelprize.org was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  11. ^ Cite error: The named reference nobel2 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  12. ^ Cite error: The named reference Kandel1999 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  13. ^ Cite error: The named reference nobel3 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  14. ^ Cite error: The named reference Cannon2009 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  15. ^ Cite error: The named reference insulin was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  16. ^ Cite error: The named reference Thompson2009 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  17. ^ Cite error: The named reference raventos1956 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  18. ^ Cite error: The named reference carrel1912 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  19. ^ Williamson C (1926) J. Urol. 16: p. 231
  20. ^ Cite error: The named reference woodruff1986 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  21. ^ Cite error: The named reference moore1964 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  22. ^ Cite error: The named reference gibbon1937 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  23. ^ Cite error: The named reference rawbw was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  24. ^ Cite error: The named reference fleming1929 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  25. ^ Cite error: The named reference mrc1956 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  26. ^ Fox MA (1986). The Case for Animal Experimention: An Evolutionary and Ethical Perspective. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-05501-8. OCLC 11754940 – via Google Books.
  27. ^ Allmon WD, Ross RM (December 2018). "Evolutionary remnants as widely accessible evidence for evolution: the structure of the argument for application to evolution education". Evolution: Education and Outreach. 11 (1): 1. doi:10.1186/s12052-017-0075-1. S2CID 29281160.
  28. ^ Slack JM (2013). Essential Developmental Biology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. OCLC 785558800.
  29. ^ Chakraborty C, Hsu C, Wen Z, Lin C, Agoramoorthy G (1 February 2009). "Zebrafish: A Complete Animal Model for In Vivo Drug Discovery and Development". Current Drug Metabolism. 10 (2): 116–124. doi:10.2174/138920009787522197. PMID 19275547.
  30. ^ Kari G, Rodeck U, Dicker AP (July 2007). "Zebrafish: An Emerging Model System for Human Disease and Drug Discovery". Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 82 (1): 70–80. doi:10.1038/sj.clpt.6100223. PMID 17495877. S2CID 41443542.
  31. ^ a b c d e f Cite error: The named reference buck1904 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  32. ^ Cite error: The named reference pu2005 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  33. ^ Cite error: The named reference dryden2005 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  34. ^ Cite error: The named reference bundle was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  35. ^ Cite error: The named reference geula1998 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  36. ^ Cite error: The named reference AIDS2005 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  37. ^ Cite error: The named reference jameson1994 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  38. ^ Cite error: The named reference lyuksyutova1984 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  39. ^ a b Taylor K, Alvarez LR (2019). "An Estimate of the Number of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes Worldwide in 2015". Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 47 (5–6). SAGE Publications: 196–213. doi:10.1177/0261192919899853. ISSN 0261-1929. PMID 32090616. S2CID 211261775.
  40. ^ Seventh Report on the Statistics on the Number of Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes in the Member States of the European Union
  41. ^ Cite error: The named reference Hedrich was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  42. ^ Carbone, Larry. (2004). What Animals Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy.
  43. ^ "EU statistics show decline in animal research numbers". Speaking of Research. 2013. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  44. ^ "U.S. Will No Longer Require Animal Testing for New Drugs". 13 January 2022.
  45. ^ Festing S, Wilkinson R (June 2007). "The ethics of animal research. Talking Point on the use of animals in scientific research". EMBO Reports. 8 (6): 526–530. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400993. ISSN 1469-221X. PMC 2002542. PMID 17545991.
  46. ^ Reddy N, Lynch B, Gujral J, Karnik K (September 2023). "Regulatory landscape of alternatives to animal testing in food safety evaluations with a focus on the western world". Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 143: 105470. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105470. ISSN 1096-0295. PMID 37591329. S2CID 260938742.
  47. ^ Petetta F, Ciccocioppo R (November 2021). "Public perception of laboratory animal testing: Historical, philosophical, and ethical view". Addiction Biology. 26 (6): e12991. doi:10.1111/adb.12991. ISSN 1369-1600. PMC 9252265. PMID 33331099.
  48. ^ Low LA, Mummery C, Berridge BR, Austin CP, Tagle DA (May 2021). "Organs-on-chips: into the next decade". Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery. 20 (5): 345–361. doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0079-3. hdl:1887/3151779. ISSN 1474-1784. PMID 32913334. S2CID 221621465.
  49. ^ Löwa A, Jevtić M, Gorreja F, Hedtrich S (May 2018). "Alternatives to animal testing in basic and preclinical research of atopic dermatitis". Experimental Dermatology. 27 (5): 476–483. doi:10.1111/exd.13498. ISSN 1600-0625. PMID 29356091. S2CID 3378256.
  50. ^ Madden JC, Enoch SJ, Paini A, Cronin MT (July 2020). "A Review of In Silico Tools as Alternatives to Animal Testing: Principles, Resources and Applications". Alternatives to Laboratory Animals: ATLA. 48 (4): 146–172. doi:10.1177/0261192920965977. ISSN 0261-1929. PMID 33119417. S2CID 226204296.
  51. ^ Reddy N, Lynch B, Gujral J, Karnik K (September 2023). "Alternatives to animal testing in toxicity testing: Current status and future perspectives in food safety assessments". Food and Chemical Toxicology. 179: 113944. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2023.113944. ISSN 1873-6351. PMID 37453475. S2CID 259915886.